Literature DB >> 9407238

Short-term effects of prone position in critically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

L Blanch1, J Mancebo, M Perez, M Martinez, A Mas, A J Betbese, D Joseph, J Ballús, U Lucangelo, E Bak.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Changing the position from supine to prone is an emerging strategy to improve gas exchange in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the acute effects on gas exchange, hemodynamics, and respiratory system mechanics of turning critically ill patients with ARDS from supine to prone.
DESIGN: Open, prospective study.
SETTING: General intensive care units. PATIENTS: 23 patients [mean age 56 +/- 17 (SD) years] who met ARDS criteria and had a Lung Injury Score > 2.5 (mean 3.25 +/- 0.3).
INTERVENTIONS: The decision to turn a patient was made using a protocol based on impaired oxygenation despite the use of positive end-expiratory pressure and a fractional inspired oxygen (FIO2) of 1. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: We measured gas exchange and hemodynamic variables in all patients and in 16 patients calculated respiratory system compliance when they were supine and 60 to 90 min after turning them to a prone position. This latter position was remarkably well tolerated and no clinically relevant complications or events were detected either during turning or while prone. The partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2)/FIO2 ratio improved from 78 +/- 37 mm Hg supine to 115 +/- 31 mm Hg prone (p < 0.001), and intrapulmonary shunt decreased from 43 +/- 11 to 34 +/- 8% (p < 0.001). Cardiac output and other hemodynamic parameters were not affected. Respiratory system compliance slightly improved from 24.7 +/- 10.2 ml/cmH20 supine to 27.8 +/- 13.2 ml/cmH20 prone (p < 0.05). An improvement in PaO2/FIO2 of more than 15% from changing from supine to prone was found in 16 patients (responders). Responders had more hypoxemia (PaO2/FIO2 70 +/- 23 vs 99 +/- 53 mm Hg in non-responders, p < 0.01), more hypercapnia (partial pressure of carbon dioxide in arterial blood (70 +/- 27 vs 64 +/- 9 mm Hg, p < 0.01) and a shorter elapsed time to the onset of ARDS and turning to the prone position (11.8 +/- 16 vs 32.8 +/- 42 days, p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Turning critically ill, severely hypoxemic patients from the supine to the prone position is a safe and useful therapeutic intervention. Our data suggest that prone positioning should be carried out early in the course of ARDS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9407238     DOI: 10.1007/s001340050453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  25 in total

Review 1.  Acute respiratory distress syndrome in traumatic brain injury: how do we manage it?

Authors:  Valentina Della Torre; Rafael Badenes; Francesco Corradi; Fabrizio Racca; Andrea Lavinio; Basil Matta; Federico Bilotta; Chiara Robba
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Involvement of the Bufadienolides in the Detection and Therapy of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Authors:  Mir M K Abbas; B Patel; Q Chen; W Jiang; B Moorthy; R Barrios; J B Puschett
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 2.584

Review 3.  Mechanisms of the effects of prone positioning in acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  C Guerin; L Baboi; J C Richard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  The efficacy and safety of prone positioning in adults patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  So Young Park; Hyun Jung Kim; Kwan Ha Yoo; Yong Bum Park; Seo Woo Kim; Seok Jeong Lee; Eun Kyung Kim; Jung Hyun Kim; Yee Hyung Kim; Ji-Yong Moon; Kyung Hoon Min; Sung Soo Park; Jinwoo Lee; Chang-Hoon Lee; Jinkyeong Park; Min Kwang Byun; Sei Won Lee; ChinKook Rlee; Ji Ye Jung; Yun Su Sim
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Advantages of the prone position for minimally invasive esophagectomy in comparison to the left decubitus position: better oxygenation after minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Eiji Tanaka; Hiroshi Okabe; Yousuke Kinjo; Shigeru Tsunoda; Kazutaka Obama; Shigeo Hisamori; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 6.  The acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Ariel M Modrykamien; Pooja Gupta
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2015-04

Review 7.  Treatment of ARDS With Prone Positioning.

Authors:  Eric L Scholten; Jeremy R Beitler; G Kim Prisk; Atul Malhotra
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Short-term effects of prone position in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with severe acute hypoxemic and hypercapnic respiratory failure.

Authors:  Jean Reignier; Olivier Lejeune; Benoit Renard; Maud Fiancette; Christine Lebert; Frederic Bontemps; Eva Clementi; Laurent Martin-Lefevre
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 9.  Efficacy of prone position in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: A pathophysiology-based review.

Authors:  Vasilios Koulouras; Georgios Papathanakos; Athanasios Papathanasiou; Georgios Nakos
Journal:  World J Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-05-04

10.  Clinical meaning of early oxygenation improvement in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome under prolonged prone positioning.

Authors:  Kwangha Lee; Mi-Young Kim; Jung-Wan Yoo; Sang-Bum Hong; Chae-Man Lim; Younsuck Koh
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 2.884

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.