Bradley P Balaton1, Oriol Fornes1,2,3, Wyeth W Wasserman1,2,3, Carolyn J Brown4. 1. Department of Medical Genetics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. 2. BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada. 3. Centre for Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. 4. Department of Medical Genetics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. carolyn.brown@ubc.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) in eutherian mammals is the epigenetic inactivation of one of the two X chromosomes in XX females in order to compensate for dosage differences with XY males. Not all genes are inactivated, and the proportion escaping from inactivation varies between human and mouse (the two species that have been extensively studied). RESULTS: We used DNA methylation to predict the XCI status of X-linked genes with CpG islands across 12 different species: human, chimp, bonobo, gorilla, orangutan, mouse, cow, sheep, goat, pig, horse and dog. We determined the XCI status of 342 CpG islands on average per species, with most species having 80-90% of genes subject to XCI. Mouse was an outlier, with a higher proportion of genes subject to XCI than found in other species. Sixteen genes were found to have discordant X-chromosome inactivation statuses across multiple species, with five of these showing primate-specific escape from XCI. These discordant genes tended to cluster together within the X chromosome, along with genes with similar patterns of escape from XCI. CTCF-binding, ATAC-seq signal and LTR repeats were enriched at genes escaping XCI when compared to genes subject to XCI; however, enrichment was only observed in three or four of the species tested. LINE and DNA repeats showed enrichment around subject genes, but again not in a consistent subset of species. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we determined XCI status across 12 species, showing mouse to be an outlier with few genes that escape inactivation. Inactivation status is largely conserved across species. The clustering of genes that change XCI status across species implicates a domain-level control. In contrast, the relatively consistent, but not universal correlation of inactivation status with enrichment of repetitive elements or CTCF binding at promoters demonstrates gene-based influences on inactivation state. This study broadens enrichment analysis of regulatory elements to species beyond human and mouse.
BACKGROUND: X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) in eutherian mammals is the epigenetic inactivation of one of the two X chromosomes in XX females in order to compensate for dosage differences with XY males. Not all genes are inactivated, and the proportion escaping from inactivation varies between human and mouse (the two species that have been extensively studied). RESULTS: We used DNA methylation to predict the XCI status of X-linked genes with CpG islands across 12 different species: human, chimp, bonobo, gorilla, orangutan, mouse, cow, sheep, goat, pig, horse and dog. We determined the XCI status of 342 CpG islands on average per species, with most species having 80-90% of genes subject to XCI. Mouse was an outlier, with a higher proportion of genes subject to XCI than found in other species. Sixteen genes were found to have discordant X-chromosome inactivation statuses across multiple species, with five of these showing primate-specific escape from XCI. These discordant genes tended to cluster together within the X chromosome, along with genes with similar patterns of escape from XCI. CTCF-binding, ATAC-seq signal and LTR repeats were enriched at genes escaping XCI when compared to genes subject to XCI; however, enrichment was only observed in three or four of the species tested. LINE and DNA repeats showed enrichment around subject genes, but again not in a consistent subset of species. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we determined XCI status across 12 species, showing mouse to be an outlier with few genes that escape inactivation. Inactivation status is largely conserved across species. The clustering of genes that change XCI status across species implicates a domain-level control. In contrast, the relatively consistent, but not universal correlation of inactivation status with enrichment of repetitive elements or CTCF binding at promoters demonstrates gene-based influences on inactivation state. This study broadens enrichment analysis of regulatory elements to species beyond human and mouse.
Entities:
Keywords:
ATAC-seq; CTCF; CpG islands; Cross-species; DNA methylation; Dosage compensation; Escape from X-chromosome inactivation; Mammals; Repetitive elements; X-chromosome inactivation
Authors: C Couldrey; T Johnson; T Lopdell; I L Zhang; M D Littlejohn; M Keehan; R G Sherlock; K Tiplady; A Scott; S R Davis; R J Spelman Journal: J Dairy Sci Date: 2017-05-03 Impact factor: 4.034
Authors: Taru Tukiainen; Alexandra-Chloé Villani; Angela Yen; Manuel A Rivas; Jamie L Marshall; Rahul Satija; Matt Aguirre; Laura Gauthier; Mark Fleharty; Andrew Kirby; Beryl B Cummings; Stephane E Castel; Konrad J Karczewski; François Aguet; Andrea Byrnes; Tuuli Lappalainen; Aviv Regev; Kristin G Ardlie; Nir Hacohen; Daniel G MacArthur Journal: Nature Date: 2017-10-11 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Alexander I Shevchenko; Anastasia A Malakhova; Eugeny A Elisaphenko; Nina A Mazurok; Tatyana B Nesterova; Neil Brockdorff; Suren M Zakian Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-08-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Zhiyuan Chen; Darren E Hagen; Juanbin Wang; Christine G Elsik; Tieming Ji; Luiz G Siqueira; Peter J Hansen; Rocío M Rivera Journal: Epigenetics Date: 2016-05-31 Impact factor: 4.528
Authors: Darcy T Ahern; Prakhar Bansal; Maria K Armillei; Isaac V Faustino; Yuvabharath Kondaveeti; Heather R Glatt-Deeley; Erin C Banda; Stefan F Pinter Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2022-09-26 Impact factor: 12.779