Literature DB >> 33592048

Comparison of diagnostic performance between convolutional neural networks and human endoscopists for diagnosis of colorectal polyp: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yixin Xu1, Wei Ding1, Yibo Wang1, Yulin Tan1, Cheng Xi1, Nianyuan Ye1, Dapeng Wu2, Xuezhong Xu1.   

Abstract

Prospective randomized trials and observational studies have revealed that early detection, classification, and removal of neoplastic colorectal polyp (CP) significantly improve the prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC). The current effectiveness of the diagnostic performance of colonoscopy remains unsatisfactory with unstable accuracy. The convolutional neural networks (CNN) system based on artificial intelligence (AI) technology has demonstrated its potential to help endoscopists in increasing diagnostic accuracy. Nonetheless, several limitations of the CNN system and controversies exist on whether it provides a better diagnostic performance compared to human endoscopists. Therefore, this study sought to address this issue. Online databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE) were used to search for studies conducted up to April 2020. Besides, the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy scale-2 (QUADAS-2) was used to evaluate the quality of the enrolled studies. Moreover, publication bias was determined using the Deeks' funnel plot. In total, 13 studies were enrolled for this meta-analysis (ranged between 2016 and 2020). Consequently, the CNN system had a satisfactory diagnostic performance in the field of CP detection (sensitivity: 0.848 [95% CI: 0.692-0.932]; specificity: 0.965 [95% CI: 0.946-0.977]; and AUC: 0.98 [95% CI: 0.96-0.99]) and CP classification (sensitivity: 0.943 [95% CI: 0.927-0.955]; specificity: 0.894 [95% CI: 0.631-0.977]; and AUC: 0.95 [95% CI: 0.93-0.97]). In comparison with human endoscopists, the CNN system was comparable to the expert but significantly better than the non-expert in the field of CP classification (CNN vs. expert: RDOR: 1.03, P = 0.9654; non-expert vs. expert: RDOR: 0.29, P = 0.0559; non-expert vs. CNN: 0.18, P = 0.0342). Therefore, the CNN system exhibited a satisfactory diagnostic performance for CP and could be used as a potential clinical diagnostic tool during colonoscopy.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33592048      PMCID: PMC7886136          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  42 in total

1.  Detection rate of serrated polyps and serrated polyposis syndrome in colorectal cancer screening cohorts: a European overview.

Authors:  J E G IJspeert; R Bevan; C Senore; M F Kaminski; E J Kuipers; A Mroz; X Bessa; P Cassoni; C Hassan; A Repici; F Balaguer; C J Rees; E Dekker
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Polyp detection algorithm can detect small polyps: Ex vivo reading test compared with endoscopists.

Authors:  Zhe Guo; Daiki Nemoto; Xin Zhu; Qin Li; Masato Aizawa; Kenichi Utano; Noriyuki Isohata; Shungo Endo; Alan Kawarai Lefor; Kazutomo Togashi
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 7.559

3.  Increased Risk of Colorectal Cancer in Individuals With a History of Serrated Polyps.

Authors:  Dan Li; Liyan Liu; Helene B Fevrier; Stacey E Alexeeff; Amanda R Doherty; Menaka Raju; Laura B Amsden; Jeffrey K Lee; Theodore R Levin; Douglas A Corley; Lisa J Herrinton
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Accurate Classification of Diminutive Colorectal Polyps Using Computer-Aided Analysis.

Authors:  Peng-Jen Chen; Meng-Chiung Lin; Mei-Ju Lai; Jung-Chun Lin; Henry Horng-Shing Lu; Vincent S Tseng
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Automatic polyp frame screening using patch based combined feature and dictionary learning.

Authors:  Younghak Shin; Ilangko Balasingham
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 4.790

Review 6.  Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jeroen C van Rijn; Johannes B Reitsma; Jaap Stoker; Patrick M Bossuyt; Sander J van Deventer; Evelien Dekker
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 7.  ASGE Technology Committee systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE PIVI thresholds for adopting real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Barham K Abu Dayyeh; Nirav Thosani; Vani Konda; Michael B Wallace; Douglas K Rex; Shailendra S Chauhan; Joo Ha Hwang; Sri Komanduri; Michael Manfredi; John T Maple; Faris M Murad; Uzma D Siddiqui; Subhas Banerjee
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Real-Time Use of Artificial Intelligence in Identification of Diminutive Polyps During Colonoscopy: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Yuichi Mori; Shin-Ei Kudo; Masashi Misawa; Yutaka Saito; Hiroaki Ikematsu; Kinichi Hotta; Kazuo Ohtsuka; Fumihiko Urushibara; Shinichi Kataoka; Yushi Ogawa; Yasuharu Maeda; Kenichi Takeda; Hiroki Nakamura; Katsuro Ichimasa; Toyoki Kudo; Takemasa Hayashi; Kunihiko Wakamura; Fumio Ishida; Haruhiro Inoue; Hayato Itoh; Masahiro Oda; Kensaku Mori
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Multivariate meta-analysis: potential and promise.

Authors:  Dan Jackson; Richard Riley; Ian R White
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Machine Learning Creates a Simple Endoscopic Classification System that Improves Dysplasia Detection in Barrett's Oesophagus amongst Non-expert Endoscopists.

Authors:  Vinay Sehgal; Avi Rosenfeld; David G Graham; Gideon Lipman; Raf Bisschops; Krish Ragunath; Manuel Rodriguez-Justo; Marco Novelli; Matthew R Banks; Rehan J Haidry; Laurence B Lovat
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 2.260

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Artificial Intelligence in Digestive Endoscopy-Where Are We and Where Are We Going?

Authors:  Radu-Alexandru Vulpoi; Mihaela Luca; Adrian Ciobanu; Andrei Olteanu; Oana-Bogdana Barboi; Vasile Liviu Drug
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-08

2.  Artificial intelligence-assisted detection and classification of colorectal polyps under colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aling Wang; Jiahao Mo; Cailing Zhong; Shaohua Wu; Sufen Wei; Binqi Tu; Chang Liu; Daman Chen; Qing Xu; Mengyi Cai; Zhuoyao Li; Wenting Xie; Miao Xie; Motohiko Kato; Xujie Xi; Beiping Zhang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-11

3.  Experimental evidence of effective human-AI collaboration in medical decision-making.

Authors:  Carlo Reverberi; Tommaso Rigon; Aldo Solari; Cesare Hassan; Paolo Cherubini; Andrea Cherubini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence Model for Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy Video Review.

Authors:  Xia Xie; Yu-Feng Xiao; Xiao-Yan Zhao; Jian-Jun Li; Qiang-Qiang Yang; Xue Peng; Xu-Biao Nie; Jian-Yun Zhou; Yong-Bing Zhao; Huan Yang; Xi Liu; En Liu; Yu-Yang Chen; Yuan-Yuan Zhou; Chao-Qiang Fan; Jian-Ying Bai; Hui Lin; Anastasios Koulaouzidis; Shi-Ming Yang
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-07-01

5.  Ultrasound-based deep learning using the VGGNet model for the differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pei-Shan Zhu; Yu-Rui Zhang; Jia-Yu Ren; Qiao-Li Li; Ming Chen; Tian Sang; Wen-Xiao Li; Jun Li; Xin-Wu Cui
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 6.  Development of artificial intelligence technology in diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Feng Liang; Shu Wang; Kai Zhang; Tong-Jun Liu; Jian-Nan Li
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2022-01-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.