Literature DB >> 25597420

ASGE Technology Committee systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE PIVI thresholds for adopting real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps.

Barham K Abu Dayyeh, Nirav Thosani, Vani Konda, Michael B Wallace, Douglas K Rex, Shailendra S Chauhan, Joo Ha Hwang, Sri Komanduri, Michael Manfredi, John T Maple, Faris M Murad, Uzma D Siddiqui, Subhas Banerjee.   

Abstract

In vivo real-time assessment of the histology of diminutive (≤5 mm) colorectal polyps detected at colonoscopy can be achieved by means of an "optical biopsy" by using currently available endoscopic technologies. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) Technology Committee to specifically assess whether acceptable performance thresholds outlined by an ASGE Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable endoscopic Innovations (PIVI) document for clinical adoption of these technologies have been met. We conducted direct meta-analyses calculating the pooled negative predictive value (NPV) for narrow-band imaging (NBI), i-SCAN, and Fujinon Intelligent Color Enhancement (FICE)-assisted optical biopsy for predicting adenomatous polyp histology of small/diminutive colorectal polyps. We also calculated the pooled percentage agreement with histopathology when assigning postpolypectomy surveillance intervals based on combining real-time optical biopsy of colorectal polyps 5 mm or smaller with histopathologic assessment of polyps larger than 5 mm. Random-effects meta-analysis models were used. Statistical heterogeneity was evaluated by means of I(2) statistics. Our meta-analyses indicate that optical biopsy with NBI, exceeds the NPV threshold for adenomatous polyp histology, supporting a "diagnose-and-leave" strategy for diminutive predicted nonneoplastic polyps in the rectosigmoid colon. The pooled NPV of NBI for adenomatous polyp histology by using the random-effects model was 91% (95% confidence interval [CI], 88-94). This finding was associated with a high degree of heterogeneity (I(2) = 89%). Subgroup analysis indicated that the pooled NPV was greater than 90% for academic medical centers (91.8%; 95% CI, 89-94), for experts (93%; 95% CI, 91-96), and when the optical biopsy assessment was made with high confidence (93%; 95% CI, 90-96). Our meta-analyses also indicate that the agreement in assignment of postpolypectomy surveillance intervals based on optical biopsy with NBI of diminutive colorectal polyps is 90% or greater in academic settings (91%; 95% CI, 86-95), with experienced endoscopists (92%; 95% CI, 88-96) and when optical biopsy assessments are made with high confidence (91%; 95% CI, 88-95). Our systematic review and meta-analysis confirms that the thresholds established by the ASGE PIVI for real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive polyps have been met, at least with NBI optical biopsy, with endoscopists who are expert in using this advanced imaging technology and when assessments are made with high confidence.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25597420     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  71 in total

Review 1.  State of the Art: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopy 2020.

Authors:  Jiyoung Lee; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2021-04-14

2.  Accuracy of computer-aided diagnosis based on narrow-band imaging endocytoscopy for diagnosing colorectal lesions: comparison with experts.

Authors:  Masashi Misawa; Shin-Ei Kudo; Yuichi Mori; Kenichi Takeda; Yasuharu Maeda; Shinichi Kataoka; Hiroki Nakamura; Toyoki Kudo; Kunihiko Wakamura; Takemasa Hayashi; Atsushi Katagiri; Toshiyuki Baba; Fumio Ishida; Haruhiro Inoue; Yukitaka Nimura; Msahiro Oda; Kensaku Mori
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 3.  Quality Assurance in Endoscopy: Which Parameters?

Authors:  Ulrike W Denzer
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2016-01-29

4.  A prospective randomized study comparing jumbo biopsy forceps to cold snare for the resection of diminutive colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Shireena Desai; Samir Gupta; Nedret Copur-Dahi; Mary L Krinsky
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Comparative efficacy of cold polypectomy techniques for diminutive colorectal polyps: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yoon Suk Jung; Chan Hyuk Park; Eunwoo Nam; Chang Soo Eun; Dong Il Park; Dong Soo Han
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Predictive Chromoendoscopy of Serrated Polyps: Is the Pendulum Swinging Toward the Pit Pattern?

Authors:  Joseph C Anderson; Amitabh Srivastava
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  The Role of Chromoendoscopy in Evaluating Colorectal Dysplasia.

Authors:  Anna M Buchner
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2017-06

8.  Polyp fingerprint: automatic recognition of colorectal polyps' unique features.

Authors:  Ana García-Rodríguez; Jorge Bernal; F Javier Sánchez; Henry Córdova; Rodrigo Garcés Durán; Cristina Rodríguez de Miguel; Gloria Fernández-Esparrach
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Polypectomy and advanced endoscopic resection.

Authors:  Kesavan Kandiah; Sharmila Subramaniam; Pradeep Bhandari
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-02-10

Review 10.  Advances in endoscopy for colorectal polyp detection and classification.

Authors:  Vijeta Pamudurthy; Nayna Lodhia; Vani J A Konda
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2019-12-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.