Literature DB >> 33592028

Responses to environmental variability by herbivorous insects and their natural enemies within a bioenergy crop, Miscanthus x giganteus.

Alisa W Coffin1, Dawn M Olson1, Lynne Seymour2, David D Bosch1, Jason M Schmidt3, Timothy C Strickland1.   

Abstract

Precision agriculture (PA) is the application of management decisions based on identifying, quantifying, and responding to space-time variability. However, knowledge of crop pest responses to within-field environmental variability, and the spatial distribution of their natural enemies, is limited. Quantitative methods providing insights on how pest-predator relationships vary within fields are potentially important tools. In this study, phloem feeders and their natural enemies, were observed over two years across 81 locations within a field of the perennial feedstock grass in Georgia, USA. Geographically weighted regression (GWR) was used to spatially correlate their abundance with environmental factors. Variables included distance to forest edge, Normalized Difference of Vegetation Index (NDVI), slope, aspect, elevation, soil particle size distribution, and weather values. GWR methods were compared with generalized linear regression methods that do not account for spatial information. Non-spatial models indicated positive relationships between phloem-feeder abundance and wind speed, but negative relationships between elevation, proportions of silt and sand, and NDVI. With data partitioned into three seasonal groups, terrain and soil variables remained significant, and natural enemies and spiders became relevant. Results from GWR indicated that magnitudes and directions of responses varied within the field, and that relationships differed among seasons. Strong negative relationships between response and explanatory factors occurred: with NDVI during mid-season; with percent silt, during mid-, and late seasons; and with spider abundance during early and late seasons. In GWR models, slope, elevation, and aspect were mostly positive indicating further that associations with elevation depended on whether models incorporated spatial information or not. By using spatially explicit models, the analysis provided a complex, nuanced understanding of within-field relationships between phloem feeders and environmental covariates. This approach provides an opportunity to learn about the variability within agricultural fields and, with further analysis, has potential to inform and improve PA and habitat management decisions.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33592028      PMCID: PMC7886118          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246855

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  18 in total

1.  Occurrence of barley yellow dwarf virus in autumn-sown cereal crops in the United Kingdom in relation to field characteristics.

Authors:  Garth N Foster; Shona Blake; Steve J Tones; Ian Barker; Richard Harrington
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.845

Review 2.  Invasion biology of thrips.

Authors:  Joseph G Morse; Mark S Hoddle
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 19.686

3.  Perennial grasslands enhance biodiversity and multiple ecosystem services in bioenergy landscapes.

Authors:  Ben P Werling; Timothy L Dickson; Rufus Isaacs; Hannah Gaines; Claudio Gratton; Katherine L Gross; Heidi Liere; Carolyn M Malmstrom; Timothy D Meehan; Leilei Ruan; Bruce A Robertson; G Philip Robertson; Thomas M Schmidt; Abbie C Schrotenboer; Tracy K Teal; Julianna K Wilson; Douglas A Landis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Spatial and Temporal Dynamics of Aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in the Columbia Basin and Northeastern Oregon.

Authors:  Mathew L Klein; Silvia I Rondon; Darrin L Walenta; Qamar Zeb; Alexzandra F Murphy
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Development and feeding of fall armyworm on Miscanthus x giganteus and switchgrass.

Authors:  J R Prasifka; J D Bradshaw; R L Meagher; R N Nagoshi; K L Steffey; M E Gray
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Elevational and seasonal variation in the foliar quality and arthropod community of Acer pensylvanicum.

Authors:  Caralyn B Zehnder; Kirk W Stodola; Blake L Joyce; David Egetter; Robert J Cooper; Mark D Hunter
Journal:  Environ Entomol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.377

Review 7.  A review of pesticide exposure and cancer incidence in the Agricultural Health Study cohort.

Authors:  Scott Weichenthal; Connie Moase; Peter Chan
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Description and Codification of Miscanthus × giganteus Growth Stages for Phenological Assessment.

Authors:  Mauricio D Tejera; Emily A Heaton
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Spatial factors play a major role as determinants of endemic ground beetle beta diversity of Madeira Island Laurisilva.

Authors:  Mário Boieiro; José C Carvalho; Pedro Cardoso; Carlos A S Aguiar; Carla Rego; Israel de Faria e Silva; Isabel R Amorim; Fernando Pereira; Eduardo B Azevedo; Paulo A V Borges; Artur R M Serrano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Plant tissue characteristics of Miscanthus x giganteus.

Authors:  Oliva Pisani; Dan Liebert; Timothy C Strickland; Alisa W Coffin
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 6.444

2.  Responses to environmental variability by herbivorous insects and their natural enemies within a bioenergy crop, Miscanthus x giganteus.

Authors:  Alisa W Coffin; Dawn M Olson; Lynne Seymour; David D Bosch; Jason M Schmidt; Timothy C Strickland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.