Literature DB >> 24474791

Perennial grasslands enhance biodiversity and multiple ecosystem services in bioenergy landscapes.

Ben P Werling1, Timothy L Dickson, Rufus Isaacs, Hannah Gaines, Claudio Gratton, Katherine L Gross, Heidi Liere, Carolyn M Malmstrom, Timothy D Meehan, Leilei Ruan, Bruce A Robertson, G Philip Robertson, Thomas M Schmidt, Abbie C Schrotenboer, Tracy K Teal, Julianna K Wilson, Douglas A Landis.   

Abstract

Agriculture is being challenged to provide food, and increasingly fuel, for an expanding global population. Producing bioenergy crops on marginal lands--farmland suboptimal for food crops--could help meet energy goals while minimizing competition with food production. However, the ecological costs and benefits of growing bioenergy feedstocks--primarily annual grain crops--on marginal lands have been questioned. Here we show that perennial bioenergy crops provide an alternative to annual grains that increases biodiversity of multiple taxa and sustain a variety of ecosystem functions, promoting the creation of multifunctional agricultural landscapes. We found that switchgrass and prairie plantings harbored significantly greater plant, methanotrophic bacteria, arthropod, and bird diversity than maize. Although biomass production was greater in maize, all other ecosystem services, including methane consumption, pest suppression, pollination, and conservation of grassland birds, were higher in perennial grasslands. Moreover, we found that the linkage between biodiversity and ecosystem services is dependent not only on the choice of bioenergy crop but also on its location relative to other habitats, with local landscape context as important as crop choice in determining provision of some services. Our study suggests that bioenergy policy that supports coordinated land use can diversify agricultural landscapes and sustain multiple critical ecosystem services.

Entities:  

Keywords:  energy policy; greenhouse gas mitigation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24474791      PMCID: PMC3910622          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1309492111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  14 in total

1.  Greenhouse gases in intensive agriculture: contributions of individual gases to the radiative forcing of the atmosphere

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Bird communities in future bioenergy landscapes of the Upper Midwest.

Authors:  Timothy D Meehan; Allen H Hurlbert; Claudio Gratton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists.

Authors:  Shinichi Nakagawa; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2007-11

4.  Energy. Beneficial biofuels--the food, energy, and environment trilemma.

Authors:  David Tilman; Robert Socolow; Jonathan A Foley; Jason Hill; Eric Larson; Lee Lynd; Stephen Pacala; John Reilly; Tim Searchinger; Chris Somerville; Robert Williams
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Recent land use change in the Western Corn Belt threatens grasslands and wetlands.

Authors:  Christopher K Wright; Michael C Wimberly
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Energy efficiency of conventional, organic, and alternative cropping systems for food and fuel at a site in the U.S. Midwest.

Authors:  Ilya Gelfand; Sieglinde S Snapp; G Philip Robertson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 7.  Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies.

Authors:  Alison G Power
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Corn-based ethanol production and environmental quality: a case of Iowa and the conservation reserve program.

Authors:  Silvia Secchi; Philip W Gassman; Jimmy R Williams; Bruce A Babcock
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 3.266

9.  Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences.

Authors:  Berta Martín-López; Irene Iniesta-Arandia; Marina García-Llorente; Ignacio Palomo; Izaskun Casado-Arzuaga; David García Del Amo; Erik Gómez-Baggethun; Elisa Oteros-Rozas; Igone Palacios-Agundez; Bárbara Willaarts; José A González; Fernando Santos-Martín; Miren Onaindia; Cesar López-Santiago; Carlos Montes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Pest-suppression potential of midwestern landscapes under contrasting bioenergy scenarios.

Authors:  Timothy D Meehan; Ben P Werling; Douglas A Landis; Claudio Gratton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  38 in total

1.  Degradation of soil fertility can cancel pollination benefits in sunflower.

Authors:  Giovanni Tamburini; Antonio Berti; Francesco Morari; Lorenzo Marini
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Soil organic carbon beneath croplands and re-established grasslands in the North Dakota Prairie Pothole Region.

Authors:  Rebecca L Phillips; Mikki R Eken; Mark S West
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Bioenergy and Biodiversity: Key Lessons from the Pan American Region.

Authors:  Keith L Kline; Fernanda Silva Martinelli; Audrey L Mayer; Rodrigo Medeiros; Camila Ortolan F Oliveira; Gerd Sparovek; Arnaldo Walter; Lisa A Venier
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Effects of management outweigh effects of plant diversity on restored animal communities in tallgrass prairies.

Authors:  Peter W Guiden; Nicholas A Barber; Ryan Blackburn; Anna Farrell; Jessica Fliginger; Sheryl C Hosler; Richard B King; Melissa Nelson; Erin G Rowland; Kirstie Savage; John P Vanek; Holly P Jones
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Exclusion of agricultural lands in spatial conservation prioritization strategies: consequences for biodiversity and ecosystem service representation.

Authors:  América P Durán; James P Duffy; Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  The grand challenge of cellulosic biofuels.

Authors:  Lee R Lynd
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  Valuation of ecosystem services of commercial shrub willow (Salix spp.) woody biomass crops.

Authors:  Alison Bressler; Philippe Vidon; Paul Hirsch; Timothy Volk
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Carbon storage potential increases with increasing ratio of C4 to C3 grass cover and soil productivity in restored tallgrass prairies.

Authors:  Brian J Spiesman; Herika Kummel; Randall D Jackson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Prairie strips improve biodiversity and the delivery of multiple ecosystem services from corn-soybean croplands.

Authors:  Lisa A Schulte; Jarad Niemi; Matthew J Helmers; Matt Liebman; J Gordon Arbuckle; David E James; Randall K Kolka; Matthew E O'Neal; Mark D Tomer; John C Tyndall; Heidi Asbjornsen; Pauline Drobney; Jeri Neal; Gary Van Ryswyk; Chris Witte
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Field Borders Provide Winter Refuge for Beneficial Predators and Parasitoids: A Case Study on Organic Farms.

Authors:  C Scott Clem; Alexandra N Harmon-Threatt
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 1.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.