| Literature DB >> 33590592 |
Qian Niu1, Ling Ma1, Shaobin Zhu1, Lan Li2, Qisheng Zheng2, Jibo Hou2,3, Hong Lian1, Lina Wu1, Xiaomei Yan1.
Abstract
Rapid quantification of viruses is vital for basic research on viral diseases as well as biomedical application of virus-based products. Here, we report the development of a high-throughput single-particle method to enumerate intact viral particles by ultrasensitive flow virometry, which detects single viruses as small as 27 nm in diameter. The nucleic acid dye SYTO 82 was used to stain the viral (or vector) genome, and a laboratory-built nano-flow cytometer (nFCM) was employed to simultaneously detect the side-scatter and fluorescence signals of individual viral particles. Using the bacteriophage T7 as a model system, intact virions were completely discriminated from empty capsids and naked viral genomes. Successful measurement of the physical virus titer and purity was demonstrated for recombinant adenoviruses, which could be used for gene delivery, therapeutic products derived from phage cocktails, and infected cell supernatants for veterinary vaccine production.Entities:
Keywords: bacteriophage; flow cytometry; vaccines; virus detection; virus titer
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33590592 PMCID: PMC8014667 DOI: 10.1002/anie.202100872
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl ISSN: 1433-7851 Impact factor: 16.823
Figure 1a) Diagram of the laboratory‐built nFCM for the simultaneous detection of the side scatter (SSC) and fluorescence (FL) of single viruses. b),c) Representative SSC and FL burst traces (b) and the bivariate dot‐plot of FL versus SSC derived from data collected over 1 min (c) for the bacteriophage T7 stained by 1 μM SYTO 82. d) Linear relationship between the concentrations of the bacteriophage T7 measured by nFCM enumeration and the traditional plaque assay; data are represented as the mean ± SD (n=3).
Enumeration of bacteriophage T7 on the nFCM.
|
Plaque assay (PFU mL−1) |
Event rate (particles min−1) |
nFCM (VP mL−1) |
VP‐to‐PFU ratio[a] |
|---|---|---|---|
|
1.33×108 |
4488±159 |
(1.45±0.05)×108 |
1.09 |
|
4.43×107 |
1644±11 |
(5.29±0.04)×107 |
1.19 |
|
1.48×107 |
553±16 |
(1.78±0.05)×107 |
1.20 |
|
4.93×106 |
183±18 |
(5.91±0.59)×107 |
1.20 |
|
1.64×106 |
57±4 |
(1.84±0.11)×106 |
1.12 |
|
5.47×105 |
20±4 |
(6.33±1.27)×105 |
1.16 |
|
1.82×105 |
7±2 |
(2.11±0.73)×105 |
1.16 |
[a] VP‐to‐PFU ratio is defined as the number of virus particles (VP) measured by nFCM enumeration divided by the number of plaque forming units (PFU) obtained by the traditional viral plaque assay.
Figure 2Differentiation of intact virions, empty capsids, and free viral DNA by nFCM. a)–d) Typical SSC and FL burst traces for T7 virions (a), empty T7 capsids (b), T7 DNA molecules (c), and a mixture of these three constituents (d). e) A bivariate dot‐plot of FL versus SSC for the mixture from data collected over 1 min. f) Fluorescence peak‐height‐distribution (i) and peak‐width‐distribution (ii) histograms for virus‐encapsulated T7 DNA and free T7 DNA molecules in the mixture.
Figure 3Characterization of the commercial rAd‐EGFP vector. a) Depiction of the production process of the rAd‐EGFP vector. b) Bivariate dot‐plot of FL versus SSC for a 1620‐fold diluent of commercial rAd‐EGFP vector from data collected over 1 min. c) Linear correlation between the concentration of complete rAds measured by nFCM enumeration and the concentration of infectious virions reported by the manufacturer; data are represented as the mean ± SD (n=3).
Figure 4Virus concentration measurement of two commercial phage cocktail products. a),b) Bivariate dot plots of FL versus SSC for 2000‐fold diluent of Changshi (a) and 200‐fold diluent of Nuoanping (b) from data collected over 1 min each. c) Comparison of phage concentrations obtained by plate counting and nFCM; data are represented as the mean ± SD (n=3).
Figure 5Characterization of virus‐based vaccines by nFCM. a) Depiction of the main production steps for virus‐based vaccines. b) Bivariate dot‐plot of FL versus SSC for preparation #A of the PEDV vaccine. c) Bivariate dot‐plot of FL versus SSC for preparation #A of the PRV vaccine. d) Viral concentration and purity of complete virions upon harvest, first purification, and second purification of the PEDV vaccine. e) Comparison between the virus concentration of PEDV and PRV measured by the TCID50 assay and nFCM method; data are represented as the mean ± SD (n=3). The dilution factor of the samples was 100, and the data acquisition time was 1 min for each sample.
Comparison of virus titers measured by plaque assay, nFCM, and qPCR.
|
|
Plaque assay (IU mL−1)[a] |
nFCM (VP mL−1) |
VP‐to‐IU ratio |
qPCR (genome mL−1) |
Genome‐to‐IU ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
rAd‐EGFP |
3.16×1010 |
(1.37±0.03)×1011 |
4.33±0.08 |
(2.55±0.01)×1012 |
80.70±0.18 |
|
PRV |
1.00×108 |
(3.30±0.07)×109 |
33.03±0.69 |
(1.86±0.03)×1010 |
186.45±2.83 |
[a] IU refers to infectious unit. The manufacturers reported IUs were PFU mL−1 for rAd‐EGFP vector and TCID50 mL−1 for PRV vaccine, respectively.