| Literature DB >> 35891946 |
Yuting Wu1, Shuai Liu1, Zhiwei Liu1, Bing Liu1, Bin Du1, Zhaoyang Tong1, Jianjie Xu1.
Abstract
Quantitative analysis is essential for virus research, especially in determining the virus titer. The classical method plaque assay is time-consuming, complex, and difficult for the phages that cannot form apparent plaque on the solid medium. In order to realize rapid and effective detection, a new method combining atomic force microscopy (AFM) observation and mathematical calculation is established. In this research, M13 phages with an appropriate dilution ratio were observed and counted by AFM. Based on the counting results, the titer of M13 phages can be calculated simply through mathematical substitution. Instead of cultivating overnight in plaque assay, this new method can be implemented within a few hours. Moreover, it is a method that can achieve visualization for titer determination and have the potential to determine the phages that fail to form apparent plaque, which is significant in virus quantitative assessment.Entities:
Keywords: AFM; Fail to form plaque; M13 bacteriophage titer; Mathematical deviation; Visualization
Year: 2022 PMID: 35891946 PMCID: PMC9293941 DOI: 10.1016/j.synbio.2022.07.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Synth Syst Biotechnol ISSN: 2405-805X
Fig. 1The scheme of the AFM method for the determination of M13 phages and comparison with plaque assay.
Fig. 2a) Fitting curve based on the exponential function, b) Fitting curve based on experimental results. c) M13 phage image for 20 min adsorption, d) M13 phage image for 60 min adsorption, e) M13 phage image for 120 min adsorption, f) Calculation of contact area by solid geometry.
Fig. 3Plaque assay for titer determination. a) dilution factor: 1011, number of observed plaques: 18, b) Dilution factor: 1010, number of observed plaques: 64. Comparison of AFM images of the different dilution factors. c) dilution factor: 1010, d) dilution factor: 1011, e) dilution factor: 1012.
Measurement of contact angle and contact area.
| Contact Angle ( | |
|---|---|
| (1) | 49.61 |
| (2) | 48.01 |
| (3) | 46.96 |
| (4) | 53.12 |
| (5) | 51.59 |
| Average | 49.86 |
Fig. 4Repeated observation for phages from 1011 dilution factor by AFM.
Detecting titer of M13 phage by AFM method.
| Numbering | a | b | c | d | e | f |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dilution ratio ( | 1011 | 1011 | 1011 | 1011 | 1011 | 1011 |
| Volume of droplet ( | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
| Scanning area ( | 10 × 10 | 10 × 10 | 10 × 10 | 10 × 10 | 10 × 10 | 10 × 10 |
| The counted number of phages ( | 55 | 56 | 60 | 40 | 45 | 50 |
| Contract area ( | 50.20 | 50.20 | 50.20 | 50.20 | 50.20 | 50.20 |
| Titer (virus particles/VP mL−1) | 5.52 × 1013 | 5.62 × 1013 | 6.02 × 1013 | 4.02 × 1013 | 4.52 × 1013 | 5.02 × 1013 |
| Average Titer (virus particles/VP mL−1) | 5.12 × 1013 | |||||
Fig. 5Statistical analysis and comparison for the two methods. a) comparison of AFM and plaque assay quantification assessment, b) correlation between AFM and plaque assay. Discussion for the time selection: c) AFM image for 12-h adsorption.