Literature DB >> 33588003

Sex-related Differences in Stress Reactivity and Cingulum White Matter.

M D Wheelock1, A M Goodman1, N G Harnett1, K H Wood1, S Mrug1, D A Granger2, D C Knight3.   

Abstract

The prefrontal cortex and limbic system are important components of the neural circuit that underlies stress and anxiety. These brain regions are connected by white matter tracts that support neural communication including the cingulum, uncinate fasciculus, and the fornix/stria-terminalis. Determining the relationship between stress reactivity and these white matter tracts may provide new insight into factors that underlie stress susceptibility and resilience. Therefore, the present study investigated sex differences in the relationship between stress reactivity and generalized fractional anisotropy (GFA) of the white matter tracts that link the prefrontal cortex and limbic system. Diffusion weighted images were collected and deterministic tractography was completed in 104 young adults (55 men, 49 women; mean age = 18.87 SEM = 0.08). Participants also completed self-report questionnaires (e.g., Trait Anxiety) and donated saliva (later assayed for cortisol) before, during, and after the Trier Social Stress Test. Results revealed that stress reactivity (area under the curve increase in cortisol) and GFA of the cingulum bundle varied by sex. Specifically, men demonstrated greater cortisol reactivity and greater GFA within the cingulum than women. Further, an interaction between sex, stress reactivity, and cingulum GFA was observed in which men demonstrated a positive relationship while women demonstrated a negative relationship between GFA and cortisol reactivity. Finally, trait anxiety was positively associated with the GFA of the fornix/stria terminalis - the white matter pathways that connect the hippocampus/amygdala to the hypothalamus. These findings advance our understanding of factors that underlie individual differences in stress reactivity.
Copyright © 2021 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DTI; anxiety; cingulum; cortisol; sex; stress

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33588003      PMCID: PMC7965343          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.02.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  67 in total

1.  Two formulas for computation of the area under the curve represent measures of total hormone concentration versus time-dependent change.

Authors:  Jens C Pruessner; Clemens Kirschbaum; Gunther Meinlschmid; Dirk H Hellhammer
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.905

2.  Stereotaxic white matter atlas based on diffusion tensor imaging in an ICBM template.

Authors:  Susumu Mori; Kenichi Oishi; Hangyi Jiang; Li Jiang; Xin Li; Kazi Akhter; Kegang Hua; Andreia V Faria; Asif Mahmood; Roger Woods; Arthur W Toga; G Bruce Pike; Pedro Rosa Neto; Alan Evans; Jiangyang Zhang; Hao Huang; Michael I Miller; Peter van Zijl; John Mazziotta
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Emotion regulation and trait anxiety are predicted by the microstructure of fibers between amygdala and prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Annuschka Salima Eden; Jan Schreiber; Alfred Anwander; Katharina Keuper; Inga Laeger; Peter Zwanzger; Pienie Zwitserlood; Harald Kugel; Christian Dobel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Impact of gender, menstrual cycle phase, and oral contraceptives on the activity of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis.

Authors:  C Kirschbaum; B M Kudielka; J Gaab; N C Schommer; D H Hellhammer
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.312

5.  Neurocircuitry of stress integration: anatomical pathways regulating the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenocortical axis of the rat.

Authors:  Dana R Ziegler; James P Herman
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.326

6.  Men and women are different: diffusion tensor imaging reveals sexual dimorphism in the microstructure of the thalamus, corpus callosum and cingulum.

Authors:  K Menzler; M Belke; E Wehrmann; K Krakow; U Lengler; A Jansen; H M Hamer; W H Oertel; F Rosenow; S Knake
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Emotion socialization as a predictor of physiological and psychological responses to stress.

Authors:  Jinhong Guo; Sylvie Mrug; David C Knight
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-04-03

8.  White matter abnormalities in Gulf War veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder: A pilot study.

Authors:  Linda M Bierer; Iliyan Ivanov; David M Carpenter; Edmund W Wong; Julia A Golier; Cheuk Y Tang; Rachel Yehuda
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 4.905

9.  Sex differences in stress response circuitry activation dependent on female hormonal cycle.

Authors:  Jill M Goldstein; Matthew Jerram; Brandon Abbs; Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli; Nikos Makris
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Circulating cortisol and cognitive and structural brain measures: The Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Justin B Echouffo-Tcheugui; Sarah C Conner; Jayandra J Himali; Pauline Maillard; Charles S DeCarli; Alexa S Beiser; Ramachandran S Vasan; Sudha Seshadri
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  1 in total

1.  Sex-specific vulnerability to depressive symptoms across adolescence and during the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of the cingulum bundle.

Authors:  Rajpreet Chahal; Tiffany C Ho; Jonas G Miller; Lauren R Borchers; Ian H Gotlib
Journal:  JCPP Adv       Date:  2022-02-24
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.