Literature DB >> 33584209

Alterations of Spinal Epidural Stimulation-Enabled Stepping by Descending Intentional Motor Commands and Proprioceptive Inputs in Humans With Spinal Cord Injury.

Megan L Gill1, Margaux B Linde1, Rena F Hale1, Cesar Lopez1, Kalli J Fautsch1, Jonathan S Calvert2, Daniel D Veith1, Lisa A Beck1, Kristin L Garlanger1, Dimitry G Sayenko3, Igor A Lavrov4,5, Andrew R Thoreson1, Peter J Grahn1,6,7, Kristin D Zhao1,8.   

Abstract

Background: Regaining control of movement following a spinal cord injury (SCI) requires utilization and/or functional reorganization of residual descending, and likely ascending, supraspinal sensorimotor pathways, which may be facilitated via task-specific training through body weight supported treadmill (BWST) training. Recently, epidural electrical stimulation (ES) combined with task-specific training demonstrated independence of standing and stepping functions in individuals with clinically complete SCI. The restoration of these functions may be dependent upon variables such as manipulation of proprioceptive input, ES parameter adjustments, and participant intent during step training. However, the impact of each variable on the degree of independence achieved during BWST stepping remains unknown. Objective: To describe the effects of descending intentional commands and proprioceptive inputs, specifically body weight support (BWS), on lower extremity motor activity and vertical ground reaction forces (vGRF) during ES-enabled BWST stepping in humans with chronic sensorimotor complete SCI. Furthermore, we describe perceived changes in the level of assistance provided by clinicians when intent and BWS are modified.
Methods: Two individuals with chronic, mid thoracic, clinically complete SCI, enrolled in an IRB and FDA (IDE G150167) approved clinical trial. A 16-contact electrode array was implanted in the epidural space between the T11-L1 vertebral regions. Lower extremity motor output and vertical ground reaction forces were obtained during clinician-assisted ES-enabled treadmill stepping with BWS. Consecutive steps were achieved during various experimentally-controlled conditions, including intentional participation and varied BWS (60% and 20%) while ES parameters remain unchanged.
Results: During ES-enabled BWST stepping, the knee extensors exhibited an increase in motor activation during trials in which stepping was passive compared to active or during trials in which 60% BWS was provided compared to 20% BWS. As a result of this increased motor activation, perceived clinician assistance increased during the transition from stance to swing. Intentional participation and 20% BWS resulted in timely and purposeful activation of the lower extremities muscles, which improved independence and decreased clinician assistance.
Conclusion: Maximizing participant intention and optimizing proprioceptive inputs through BWS during ES-enabled BWST stepping may facilitate greater independence during BWST stepping for individuals with clinically complete SCI. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02592668.
Copyright © 2021 Gill, Linde, Hale, Lopez, Fautsch, Calvert, Veith, Beck, Garlanger, Sayenko, Lavrov, Thoreson, Grahn and Zhao.

Entities:  

Keywords:  body weight supported stepping; epidural spinal stimulation; multi- modal rehabilitation; paralysis; spinal cord injury; spinal neuromodulation; task-specific training

Year:  2021        PMID: 33584209      PMCID: PMC7875885          DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2020.590231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci        ISSN: 1662-5137


  55 in total

1.  The human spinal cord interprets velocity-dependent afferent input during stepping.

Authors:  Janell A Beres-Jones; Susan J Harkema
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2004-08-02       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Evidence of subclinical brain influence in clinically complete spinal cord injury: discomplete SCI.

Authors:  A M Sherwood; M R Dimitrijevic; W B McKay
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.181

3.  Augmentation of Voluntary Locomotor Activity by Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation in Motor-Incomplete Spinal Cord-Injured Individuals.

Authors:  Ursula S Hofstoetter; Matthias Krenn; Simon M Danner; Christian Hofer; Helmut Kern; William B McKay; Winfried Mayr; Karen Minassian
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.094

4.  Static optimization of muscle forces during gait in comparison to EMG-to-force processing approach.

Authors:  Sofia Heintz; Elena M Gutierrez-Farewik
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-10-30       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  Predictions of knee and ankle moments of force in walking from EMG and kinematic data.

Authors:  S J Olney; D A Winter
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Effects of physical guidance and knowledge of results on motor learning: support for the guidance hypothesis.

Authors:  C J Winstein; P S Pohl; R Lewthwaite
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.500

7.  Noninvasive Reactivation of Motor Descending Control after Paralysis.

Authors:  Yury P Gerasimenko; Daniel C Lu; Morteza Modaber; Sharon Zdunowski; Parag Gad; Dimitry G Sayenko; Erika Morikawa; Piia Haakana; Adam R Ferguson; Roland R Roy; V Reggie Edgerton
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 5.269

8.  Neuromodulation of motor-evoked potentials during stepping in spinal rats.

Authors:  Parag Gad; Igor Lavrov; Prithvi Shah; Hui Zhong; Roland R Roy; V Reggie Edgerton; Yury Gerasimenko
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  A brain-spine interface alleviating gait deficits after spinal cord injury in primates.

Authors:  Marco Capogrosso; Tomislav Milekovic; David Borton; Fabien Wagner; Eduardo Martin Moraud; Jean-Baptiste Mignardot; Nicolas Buse; Jerome Gandar; Quentin Barraud; David Xing; Elodie Rey; Simone Duis; Yang Jianzhong; Wai Kin D Ko; Qin Li; Peter Detemple; Tim Denison; Silvestro Micera; Erwan Bezard; Jocelyne Bloch; Grégoire Courtine
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Motor recovery after activity-based training with spinal cord epidural stimulation in a chronic motor complete paraplegic.

Authors:  Enrico Rejc; Claudia A Angeli; Darryn Atkinson; Susan J Harkema
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  4 in total

1.  A Review of Functional Restoration From Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Alice Lin; Elias Shaaya; Jonathan S Calvert; Samuel R Parker; David A Borton; Jared S Fridley
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2022-09-30

2.  Spinal cord imaging markers and recovery of standing with epidural stimulation in individuals with clinically motor complete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Andrew C Smith; Claudia A Angeli; Beatrice Ugiliweneza; Kenneth A Weber; Robert J Bert; Mohammadjavad Negahdar; Samineh Mesbah; Maxwell Boakye; Susan J Harkema; Enrico Rejc
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 2.064

3.  Voluntary Modulation of Evoked Responses Generated by Epidural and Transcutaneous Spinal Stimulation in Humans with Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Jonathan S Calvert; Megan L Gill; Margaux B Linde; Daniel D Veith; Andrew R Thoreson; Cesar Lopez; Kendall H Lee; Yury P Gerasimenko; Victor R Edgerton; Igor A Lavrov; Kristin D Zhao; Peter J Grahn; Dimitry G Sayenko
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-10-24       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Quantitative Assessment of Clinician Assistance During Dynamic Rehabilitation Using Force Sensitive Resistors.

Authors:  Margaux B Linde; Andrew R Thoreson; Cesar Lopez; Megan L Gill; Daniel D Veith; Rena F Hale; Jonathan S Calvert; Peter J Grahn; Kalli J Fautsch; Dimitry G Sayenko; Kristin D Zhao
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2021-12-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.