Literature DB >> 26450344

Augmentation of Voluntary Locomotor Activity by Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation in Motor-Incomplete Spinal Cord-Injured Individuals.

Ursula S Hofstoetter1, Matthias Krenn1, Simon M Danner1,2,3, Christian Hofer4,5, Helmut Kern4,6, William B McKay7, Winfried Mayr1, Karen Minassian1.   

Abstract

The level of sustainable excitability within lumbar spinal cord circuitries is one of the factors determining the functional outcome of locomotor therapy after motor-incomplete spinal cord injury. Here, we present initial data using noninvasive transcutaneous lumbar spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) to modulate this central state of excitability during voluntary treadmill stepping in three motor-incomplete spinal cord-injured individuals. Stimulation was applied at 30 Hz with an intensity that generated tingling sensations in the lower limb dermatomes, yet without producing muscle reflex activity. This stimulation changed muscle activation, gait kinematics, and the amount of manual assistance required from the therapists to maintain stepping with some interindividual differences. The effect on motor outputs during treadmill-stepping was essentially augmentative and step-phase dependent despite the invariant tonic stimulation. The most consistent modification was found in the gait kinematics, with the hip flexion during swing increased by 11.3° ± 5.6° across all subjects. This preliminary work suggests that tSCS provides for a background increase in activation of the lumbar spinal locomotor circuitry that has partially lost its descending drive. Voluntary inputs and step-related feedback build upon the stimulation-induced increased state of excitability in the generation of locomotor activity. Thus, tSCS essentially works as an electrical neuroprosthesis augmenting remaining motor control.
Copyright © 2015 International Center for Artificial Organs and Transplantation and Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Human; Locomotor training; Neuromodulation; Spinal cord injury; Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26450344     DOI: 10.1111/aor.12615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Organs        ISSN: 0160-564X            Impact factor:   3.094


  35 in total

1.  Complications of epidural spinal stimulation: lessons from the past and alternatives for the future.

Authors:  Giuliano Taccola; Sean Barber; Phillip J Horner; Humberto A Cerrel Bazo; Dimitry Sayenko
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Stimulation Promotes Long-Term Recovery of Upper Extremity Function in Chronic Tetraplegia.

Authors:  Fatma Inanici; Soshi Samejima; Parag Gad; V Reggie Edgerton; Christoph P Hofstetter; Chet T Moritz
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.802

3.  Trunk Stability Enabled by Noninvasive Spinal Electrical Stimulation after Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Mrinal Rath; Albert H Vette; Shyamsundar Ramasubramaniam; Kun Li; Joel Burdick; Victor R Edgerton; Yury P Gerasimenko; Dimitry G Sayenko
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 4.  Rehabilitation Strategies after Spinal Cord Injury: Inquiry into the Mechanisms of Success and Failure.

Authors:  Marie-Pascale Côté; Marion Murray; Michel A Lemay
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 5.269

5.  A Review of Functional Restoration From Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Alice Lin; Elias Shaaya; Jonathan S Calvert; Samuel R Parker; David A Borton; Jared S Fridley
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2022-09-30

Review 6.  Supraspinal Control Predicts Locomotor Function and Forecasts Responsiveness to Training after Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Edelle C Field-Fote; Jaynie F Yang; D Michele Basso; Monica A Gorassini
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  The experience of spasticity after spinal cord injury: perceived characteristics and impact on daily life.

Authors:  William Barry McKay; William Mark Sweatman; Edelle C Field-Fote
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 2.772

8.  Self-Assisted Standing Enabled by Non-Invasive Spinal Stimulation after Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Dimitry G Sayenko; Mrinal Rath; Adam R Ferguson; Joel W Burdick; Leif A Havton; V Reggie Edgerton; Yury P Gerasimenko
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 9.  Nervous system modulation through electrical stimulation in companion animals.

Authors:  Ângela Martins; Débora Gouveia; Ana Cardoso; Óscar Gamboa; Darryl Millis; António Ferreira
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 1.695

10.  Transspinal stimulation and step training alter function of spinal networks in complete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Morad Zaaya; Timothy S Pulverenti; Maria Knikou
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2021-07-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.