Literature DB >> 17071088

Static optimization of muscle forces during gait in comparison to EMG-to-force processing approach.

Sofia Heintz1, Elena M Gutierrez-Farewik.   

Abstract

Individual muscle forces evaluated from experimental motion analysis may be useful in mathematical simulation, but require additional musculoskeletal and mathematical modelling. A numerical method of static optimization was used in this study to evaluate muscular forces during gait. The numerical algorithm used was built on the basis of traditional optimization techniques, i.e., constrained minimization technique using the Lagrange multiplier method to solve for constraints. Measuring exact muscle forces during gait analysis is not currently possible. The developed optimization method calculates optimal forces during gait, given a specific performance criterion, using kinematics and kinetics from gait analysis together with muscle architectural data. Experimental methods to validate mathematical methods to calculate forces are limited. Electromyography (EMG) is frequently used as a tool to determine muscle activation in experimental studies on human motion. A method of estimating force from the EMG signal, the EMG-to-force approach, was recently developed by Bogey et al. [Bogey RA, Perry J, Gitter AJ. An EMG-to-force processing approach for determining ankle muscle forcs during normal human gait. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2005;13:302-10] and is based on normalization of activation during a maximum voluntary contraction to documented maximal muscle strength. This method was adapted in this study as a tool with which to compare static optimization during a gait cycle. Muscle forces from static optimization and from EMG-to-force muscle forces show reasonably good correlation in the plantarflexor and dorsiflexor muscles, but less correlation in the knee flexor and extensor muscles. Additional comparison of the mathematical muscle forces from static optimization to documented averaged EMG data reveals good overall correlation to patterns of evaluated muscular activation. This indicates that on an individual level, muscular force patterns from mathematical models can arguably be more accurate than from those obtained from surface EMG during gait, though magnitude must still be validated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17071088     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.09.074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  23 in total

1.  Masticatory loadings and cranial deformation in Macaca fascicularis: a finite element analysis sensitivity study.

Authors:  L C Fitton; J F Shi; M J Fagan; P O'Higgins
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Modeling and simulating the neuromuscular mechanisms regulating ankle and knee joint stiffness during human locomotion.

Authors:  Massimo Sartori; Marco Maculan; Claudio Pizzolato; Monica Reggiani; Dario Farina
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Predicting muscle activation patterns from motion and anatomy: modelling the skull of Sphenodon (Diapsida: Rhynchocephalia).

Authors:  Neil Curtis; Marc E H Jones; Susan E Evans; JunFen Shi; Paul O'Higgins; Michael J Fagan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Upper limb muscle forces during a simple reach-to-grasp movement: a comparative study.

Authors:  N Louis; P Gorce
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Kinematic and electromyography analysis of paraplegic gait with the assistance of mechanical orthosis and walker.

Authors:  Mina Baniasad; Farzam Farahmand; Mokhtar Arazpour; Hassan Zohoor
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 1.985

6.  Determination of the correlation between muscle forces obtained from OpenSim and muscle activities obtained from electromyography in the elderly.

Authors:  Mohammad T Karimi; Fatemeh Hemmati; Mohammad A Mardani; Keyvan Sharifmoradi; Seyed Iman Hosseini; Reza Fadayevatan; Amir Esrafilian
Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2021-02-08

7.  Musculoskeletal modelling under an evolutionary perspective: deciphering the role of single muscle regions in closely related insects.

Authors:  Sina David; Johannes Funken; Wolfgang Potthast; Alexander Blanke
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Model-based estimation of knee stiffness.

Authors:  Serge Pfeifer; Heike Vallery; Michael Hardegger; Robert Riener; Eric J Perreault
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Analytical and numerical analysis of inverse optimization problems: conditions of uniqueness and computational methods.

Authors:  Alexander V Terekhov; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 2.086

10.  Biomechanical features of six design of the delta external fixator for treating Pilon fracture: a finite element study.

Authors:  Muhammad Hanif Ramlee; Mohd Ayub Sulong; Evelyn Garcia-Nieto; Daniel Angure Penaranda; Antonio Ros Felip; Mohammed Rafiq Abdul Kadir
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 2.602

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.