Literature DB >> 33575347

Predicting the Failure Risk of Internal Fixation Devices in Chinese Patients Undergoing Spinal Internal Fixation Surgery: Development and Assessment of a New Predictive Nomogram.

Chong Liu1,2, Zide Zhang1, Yuan Ma3, Tuo Liang1, Chaojie Yu1, Zhaojun Lu1, Guoyong Xu1, Zequn Wang1, Jiarui Chen1, Jie Jiang1, Tianyou Chen1, Hao Li1, Zhen Ye1, Xinli Zhan1.   

Abstract

The current study is aimed at developing and validating a nomogram of the risk of failure of internal fixation devices in Chinese patients undergoing spinal internal fixation. We collected data from a total of 1139 patients admitted for spinal internal fixation surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University from May 2012 to February 2019. Of these, 1050 patients were included in the spinal internal fixation group and 89 patients in the spinal internal fixation device failure group. Patients were divided into training and validation tests. The risk assessment of the failure of the spinal internal fixation device used 14 characteristics. In the training test, the feature selection of the failure model of the spinal internal fixation device was optimized using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model. Based on the characteristics selected in the LASSO regression model, multivariate logistic regression analysis was used for constructing the model. Identification, calibration, and clinical usefulness of predictive models were assessed using C-index, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis. A validation test was used to validate the constructed model. In the training test, the risk prediction nomogram included gender, age, presence or absence of scoliosis, and unilateral or bilateral fixation. The model demonstrated moderate predictive power with a C-index of 0.722 (95% confidence interval: 0.644-0.800) and the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.722. Decision curve analysis depicted that the failure risk nomogram was clinically useful when the probability threshold for internal fixation device failure was 3%. The C-index of the validation test was 0.761. This novel nomogram of failure risk for spinal instrumentation includes gender, age, presence or absence of scoliosis, and unilateral or bilateral fixation. It can be used for evaluating the risk of instrumentation failure in patients undergoing spinal instrumentation surgery.
Copyright © 2021 Chong Liu et al.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33575347      PMCID: PMC7857875          DOI: 10.1155/2021/8840107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Res Int            Impact factor:   3.411


  34 in total

1.  Overall C as a measure of discrimination in survival analysis: model specific population value and confidence interval estimation.

Authors:  Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Rod fracture after long construct fusion for spinal deformity: clinical and radiographic risk factors.

Authors:  Tsutomu Akazawa; Toshiaki Kotani; Tsuyoshi Sakuma; Tetsuharu Nemoto; Shohei Minami
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 1.601

3.  Causes of the failure and the revision methods for congenital scoliosis due to hemivertebra.

Authors:  Zhicai Shi; Quan Li; Bin Cai; Baoqing Yu; Yuan Feng; Jibin Wu; Ming Li; Bo Ran
Journal:  Congenit Anom (Kyoto)       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.409

4.  Examining risk factors for posterior migration of fusion cages following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a possible limitation of unilateral pedicle screw fixation.

Authors:  Yasuchika Aoki; Masatsune Yamagata; Fumitake Nakajima; Yoshikazu Ikeda; Koh Shimizu; Masakazu Yoshihara; Junichi Iwasaki; Tomoaki Toyone; Koichi Nakagawa; Arata Nakajima; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Seiji Ohtori
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2010-09

5.  Dynamic stabilization in addition to decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Klaus John Schnake; Stefan Schaeren; Bernard Jeanneret
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 6.  Osteoporosis in men and women.

Authors:  Sydney L Bonnick
Journal:  Clin Cornerstone       Date:  2006

7.  Effects of bone mineral density on pedicle screw fixation.

Authors:  T L Halvorson; L A Kelley; K A Thomas; T S Whitecloud; S D Cook
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Surgical treatment of degenerative and traumatic spinal diseases with expandable screws in patients with osteoporosis: 2-year follow-up clinical study.

Authors:  Roberto Gazzeri; Raffaelino Roperto; Claudio Fiore
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2016-06-17

9.  Predicting medication nonadherence risk in a Chinese inflammatory rheumatic disease population: development and assessment of a new predictive nomogram.

Authors:  Huijing Wang; Le Zhang; Zhe Liu; Xiaodong Wang; Shikai Geng; Jiaoyu Li; Ting Li; Shuang Ye
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 2.711

10.  Evaluation of implant loosening following segmental pedicle screw fixation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a 2 year follow-up with low-dose CT.

Authors:  Kasim Abul-Kasim; Acke Ohlin
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2014-08-24
View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of Clinical Data Between Patients With Complications and Without Complications After Spinal Tuberculosis Surgery: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Authors:  Liyi Chen; Chong Liu; Zhen Ye; Wuhua Chen; Xuhua Sun; Jiarui Chen; Hao Li; Tuo Liang; Shengsheng Huang; Jie Jiang; Tianyou Chen; Hao Guo; Yuanlin Yao; Shian Liao; Chaojie Yu; Shaofeng Wu; Binguang Fan; Xinli Zhan
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-29
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.