Literature DB >> 33575287

Machine learning predicts unpredicted deaths with high accuracy following hepatopancreatic surgery.

Kota Sahara1,2, Anghela Z Paredes1, Diamantis I Tsilimigras1, Kazunari Sasaki3, Amika Moro1, J Madison Hyer1, Rittal Mehta1, Syeda A Farooq1, Lu Wu1, Itaru Endo2, Timothy M Pawlik1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Machine learning to predict morbidity and mortality-especially in a population traditionally considered low risk-has not been previously examined. We sought to characterize the incidence of death among patients with a low estimated morbidity and mortality risk based on the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) estimated probability (EP), as well as develop a machine learning model to identify individuals at risk for "unpredicted death" (UD) among patients undergoing hepatopancreatic (HP) procedures.
METHODS: The NSQIP database was used to identify patients who underwent elective HP surgery between 2012-2017. The risk of morbidity and mortality was stratified into three tiers (low, intermediate, or high estimated) using a k-means clustering method with bin sorting. A machine learning classification tree and multivariable regression analyses were used to predict 30-day mortality with a 10-fold cross validation. C statistics were used to compare model performance.
RESULTS: Among 63,507 patients who underwent an HP procedure, median patient age was 63 (IQR: 54-71) years. Patients underwent either pancreatectomy (n=38,209, 60.2%) or hepatic resection (n=25,298, 39.8%). Patients were stratified into three tiers of predicted morbidity and mortality risk based on the NSQIP EP: low (n=36,923, 58.1%), intermediate (n=23,609, 37.2%) and high risk (n=2,975, 4.7%). Among 36,923 patients with low estimated risk of morbidity and mortality, 237 patients (0.6%) experienced a UD. According to the classification tree analysis, age was the most important factor to predict UD (importance 16.9) followed by preoperative albumin level (importance: 10.8), disseminated cancer (importance: 6.5), preoperative platelet count (importance: 6.5), and sex (importance 5.9). Among patients deemed to be low risk, the c-statistic for the machine learning derived prediction model was 0.807 compared with an AUC of only 0.662 for the NSQIP EP.
CONCLUSIONS: A prognostic model derived using machine learning methodology performed better than the NSQIP EP in predicting 30-day UD among low risk patients undergoing HP surgery. 2021 Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mortality; National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP); machine learning; unpredicted

Year:  2021        PMID: 33575287      PMCID: PMC7867718          DOI: 10.21037/hbsn.2019.11.30

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr        ISSN: 2304-3881            Impact factor:   7.293


  43 in total

1.  Data-based risk calculators becoming more sophisticated--and more popular.

Authors:  Mike Mitka
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Impact of Liver Cirrhosis on Perioperative Outcomes Among Elderly Patients Undergoing Hepatectomy: the Effect of Minimally Invasive Surgery.

Authors:  Kota Sahara; Anghela Z Paredes; Diamantis I Tsilimigras; J Madison Hyer; Katiuscha Merath; Lu Wu; Rittal Mehta; Eliza W Beal; Susan White; Itaru Endo; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Use of perioperative epidural analgesia among Medicare patients undergoing hepatic and pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Katiuscha Merath; J Madison Hyer; Rittal Mehta; Fabio Bagante; Anghela Paredes; Lu Wu; Kota Sahara; Mary Dillhoff; Jordan Cloyd; Aslam Ejaz; Allan Tsung; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy in Retinal Fundus Photographs.

Authors:  Varun Gulshan; Lily Peng; Marc Coram; Martin C Stumpe; Derek Wu; Arunachalam Narayanaswamy; Subhashini Venugopalan; Kasumi Widner; Tom Madams; Jorge Cuadros; Ramasamy Kim; Rajiv Raman; Philip C Nelson; Jessica L Mega; Dale R Webster
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons.

Authors:  Karl Y Bilimoria; Yaoming Liu; Jennifer L Paruch; Lynn Zhou; Thomas E Kmiecik; Clifford Y Ko; Mark E Cohen
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  From Preoperative Assessment to Preoperative Optimization of Frailty.

Authors:  Liane S Feldman; Franco Carli
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 14.766

7.  Synergistic Effects of Perioperative Complications on 30-Day Mortality Following Hepatopancreatic Surgery.

Authors:  Katiuscha Merath; Qinyu Chen; Fabio Bagante; Ozgur Akgul; Jay J Idrees; Mary Dillhoff; Jordan M Cloyd; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Assessment of the Addition of Hypoalbuminemia to ACS-NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Wan-Hsiang Hu; Hong-Hwa Chen; Ko-Chao Lee; Lin Liu; Samuel Eisenstein; Lisa Parry; Bard Cosman; Sonia Ramamoorthy
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  A Comparison of a Machine Learning Model with EuroSCORE II in Predicting Mortality after Elective Cardiac Surgery: A Decision Curve Analysis.

Authors:  Jérôme Allyn; Nicolas Allou; Pascal Augustin; Ivan Philip; Olivier Martinet; Myriem Belghiti; Sophie Provenchere; Philippe Montravers; Cyril Ferdynus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Clinical Outcomes for Children During Emergency Department Triage.

Authors:  Tadahiro Goto; Carlos A Camargo; Mohammad Kamal Faridi; Robert J Freishtat; Kohei Hasegawa
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-01-04
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Recent Advances of Deep Learning for Computational Histopathology: Principles and Applications.

Authors:  Yawen Wu; Michael Cheng; Shuo Huang; Zongxiang Pei; Yingli Zuo; Jianxin Liu; Kai Yang; Qi Zhu; Jie Zhang; Honghai Hong; Daoqiang Zhang; Kun Huang; Liang Cheng; Wei Shao
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 2.  The role of artificial intelligence in pancreatic surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  D Schlanger; F Graur; C Popa; E Moiș; N Al Hajjar
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-03-02

3.  Hidden-mortality risk among patients deemed "low-risk" following high-risk operations.

Authors:  Yongliang Sun; Wenquan Niu; Zhiying Yang
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 8.265

4.  Predicting Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Pancreatectomy Using Wearable Technology and Machine Learning: Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Heidy Cos; Dingwen Li; Chenyang Lu; Chet W Hammill; Gregory Williams; Jeffrey Chininis; Ruixuan Dai; Jingwen Zhang; Rohit Srivastava; Lacey Raper; Dominic Sanford; William Hawkins
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Research trends of artificial intelligence in pancreatic cancer: a bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Hua Yin; Feixiong Zhang; Xiaoli Yang; Xiangkun Meng; Yu Miao; Muhammad Saad Noor Hussain; Li Yang; Zhaoshen Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 5.738

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.