Phob Ganokroj1, Nuchanun Sompornpanich1, Pichitpol Kerdsomnuek1, Bavornrat Vanadurongwan1, Pisit Lertwanich2. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Prannok Road, Bangkok Noi, 10700, Bangkok, Thailand. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Prannok Road, Bangkok Noi, 10700, Bangkok, Thailand. pisit.ler@mahidol.ac.th.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Measurement of hip rotation is a crucial clinical parameter for the identification of hip problems and the monitoring of symptoms. The objective of this study was to determine whether the use of two smartphone applications is valid and reliable for the measurement of hip rotation. METHODS: An experimental, cross-sectional study was undertaken to assess passive hip internal and external rotation in three positions by two examiners. The hip rotational angles were measured by a smartphone clinometer application in the sitting and prone positions, and by a smartphone compass application in the supine position; their results were compared with those of the standard, three-dimensional, motion analysis system. The validities and inter-rater and intra-rater reliabilities of the smartphone applications were evaluated. RESULTS: The study involved 24 participants. The validities were good to excellent for the internal rotation angles in all positions (ICC 0.81-0.94), good for the external rotation angles in the prone position (ICC 0.79), and fair for the sitting and supine positions (ICC 0.70-0.73). The measurement of the hip internal rotation in the supine position had the highest ICC value of 0.94 (0.91, 0.96). The two smartphone applications showed good-to-excellent intra-rater reliability, but good-to-excellent inter-rater reliability for only three of the six positions (two other positions had fair reliability, while one position demonstrated poor reliability). CONCLUSIONS: The two smartphone applications have good-to-excellent validity and intra-rater reliability, but only fair-to-good inter-rater reliability for the measurement of the hip rotational angle. The most valid hip rotational position in this study was the supine IR angle measurement, while the lowest validity was the ER angle measurement in the sitting position. The smartphone application is one of the practical measurements in hip rotational angles. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Number 20181022003 at the Thai Clinical Trials Registry ( http://www.clinicaltrials.in.th ) which was retrospectively registered at 2018-10-18 15:30:29.
BACKGROUND: Measurement of hip rotation is a crucial clinical parameter for the identification of hip problems and the monitoring of symptoms. The objective of this study was to determine whether the use of two smartphone applications is valid and reliable for the measurement of hip rotation. METHODS: An experimental, cross-sectional study was undertaken to assess passive hip internal and external rotation in three positions by two examiners. The hip rotational angles were measured by a smartphone clinometer application in the sitting and prone positions, and by a smartphone compass application in the supine position; their results were compared with those of the standard, three-dimensional, motion analysis system. The validities and inter-rater and intra-rater reliabilities of the smartphone applications were evaluated. RESULTS: The study involved 24 participants. The validities were good to excellent for the internal rotation angles in all positions (ICC 0.81-0.94), good for the external rotation angles in the prone position (ICC 0.79), and fair for the sitting and supine positions (ICC 0.70-0.73). The measurement of the hip internal rotation in the supine position had the highest ICC value of 0.94 (0.91, 0.96). The two smartphone applications showed good-to-excellent intra-rater reliability, but good-to-excellent inter-rater reliability for only three of the six positions (two other positions had fair reliability, while one position demonstrated poor reliability). CONCLUSIONS: The two smartphone applications have good-to-excellent validity and intra-rater reliability, but only fair-to-good inter-rater reliability for the measurement of the hip rotational angle. The most valid hip rotational position in this study was the supine IR angle measurement, while the lowest validity was the ER angle measurement in the sitting position. The smartphone application is one of the practical measurements in hip rotational angles. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Number 20181022003 at the Thai Clinical Trials Registry ( http://www.clinicaltrials.in.th ) which was retrospectively registered at 2018-10-18 15:30:29.
Authors: Emmanuel A Audenaert; Ian Peeters; Lara Vigneron; Nick Baelde; Christophe Pattyn Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2012-04-02 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Steven Milanese; Susan Gordon; Petra Buettner; Carol Flavell; Sally Ruston; Damien Coe; William O'Sullivan; Steven McCormack Journal: Man Ther Date: 2014-06-04
Authors: R Altman; G Alarcón; D Appelrouth; D Bloch; D Borenstein; K Brandt; C Brown; T D Cooke; W Daniel; D Feldman Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 1991-05
Authors: Silvio Nussbaumer; Michael Leunig; Julia F Glatthorn; Simone Stauffacher; Hans Gerber; Nicola A Maffiuletti Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2010-08-31 Impact factor: 2.362