Literature DB >> 22472271

Hip morphological characteristics and range of internal rotation in femoroacetabular impingement.

Emmanuel A Audenaert1, Ian Peeters, Lara Vigneron, Nick Baelde, Christophe Pattyn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Radiographic features specifically related to the occurrence of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) appear to be highly prevalent in the asymptomatic population. It remains unclear, however, how these incidental findings should be interpreted clinically and which other variables might differentiate between true incidental findings and preclinical patients.
PURPOSE: To study the association between cam and overall hip morphological characteristics and range of motion in impingement patients, asymptomatic patients (healthy patients with radiographic features specific to FAI), and healthy controls. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS: Morphological parameters describing cam and overall hip anatomy were obtained from 30 patients (10 per subgroup) with use of 3-dimensional computational methods. In addition, the range of internal rotation in high flexion activities was evaluated, and its relation to hip morphological variables was analyzed in a multivariate regression model.
RESULTS: Size of the cam lesion and range of motion significantly differed between groups (P < .05). The range of internal rotation on impingement testing was found to average 27.9° in the healthy control group compared with 21.1° in the asymptomatic control group with radiographic features specific to FAI (P < .001) and 12.3° in the patient group (P < .001). Cam size, acetabular coverage, and femoral version appeared to be predictive variables for the range of internal rotation. Seventy-five percent of variance between patients could be attributed to the combined effect of these 3 variables (R = .86). The range of motion was decreased in cam patients and asymptomatic patients, and early femoroacetabular conflict was not restricted to the area of the cam lesion but involved the entire anterior femoral head-neck junction.
CONCLUSION: Decreased range of motion, as found in FAI, is not solely dependent on the size or even the occurrence of a cam lesion but should be interpreted by taking into account the overall hip anatomy, specifically femoral version and acetabular coverage. Decreased femoral anteversion and increased acetabular coverage add to the risk of early femoroacetabular collision during sports and activities of daily living and therefore appear to be additional predictive variables, besides the finding of a cam lesion, for the risk of clinical hip impingement development. In addition, the findings suggest that surgical osteochondroplasty to restore a normal range of motion may necessitate more excessive bone resection than what simply appears to be a bump on imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22472271     DOI: 10.1177/0363546512441328

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  40 in total

1.  Combining femoral and acetabular parameters in femoroacetabular impingement: the omega surface.

Authors:  Heinse Bouma; Tom Hogervorst; Emanuel Audenaert; Paulien van Kampen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Can combining femoral and acetabular morphology parameters improve the characterization of femoroacetabular impingement?

Authors:  Heinse W Bouma; Tom Hogervorst; Emmanuel Audenaert; Peter Krekel; Paulien M van Kampen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Arthroscopic aproach of femoroacetabular impigement: Early clinical outcomes. A multicentric study.

Authors:  J Wadhwani; Bellido P Correa; Huete H Chicote
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-05-17

4.  In-vivo hip arthrokinematics during supine clinical exams: Application to the study of femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Ashley L Kapron; Stephen K Aoki; Christopher L Peters; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 5.  The effect of femoro-acetabular impingement on the kinematics and kinetics of the hip joint.

Authors:  Zeiad Alshameeri; Vikas Khanduja
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  New perspectives on femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.

Authors:  Moin Khan; Asheesh Bedi; Freddie Fu; Jon Karlsson; Olufemi R Ayeni; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 20.543

7.  What Are the Results of Surgical Treatment of Hip Dysplasia With Concomitant Cam Deformity?

Authors:  Jens Goronzy; Lea Franken; Albrecht Hartmann; Falk Thielemann; Anne Postler; Tobias Paulus; Klaus-Peter Günther
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Prevalence of radiographic parameters predisposing to femoroacetabular impingement in young asymptomatic Chinese and white subjects.

Authors:  Jan Van Houcke; Wan Pan Yau; Chun Hoi Yan; Wouter Huysse; Hannes Dechamps; Wing Hang Lau; Chun Sing Wong; Christophe Pattyn; Emmanuel Albert Audenaert
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Relationship between femoroacetabular contact areas and hip position in the normal joint: an in vitro evaluation.

Authors:  Cecilia Signorelli; Nicola Lopomo; Tommaso Bonanzinga; Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli; Marc R Safran; Maurilio Marcacci; Stefano Zaffagnini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Valgus hip with high antetorsion causes pain through posterior extraarticular FAI.

Authors:  Klaus A Siebenrock; Simon Damian Steppacher; Pascal Cyrill Haefeli; Joseph Michael Schwab; Moritz Tannast
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.