Literature DB >> 3357083

Changes in bioelectric potentials on bone associated with direct current stimulation of osteogenesis.

A Rubinacci1, J Black, C T Brighton, Z B Friedenberg.   

Abstract

This study was designed to determine whether changes occur in the bioelectric potentials on bone during and after bone stimulation with a 20-microA direct current (DC) and whether the variations in bioelectric potentials are related to the variations in bone formation. The bioelectric potentials were recorded at different times on the rabbit distal tibial surface, during (current-on state) and after (current-off state) DC stimulation with a cathode implanted within the medullary canal. The new bone formed at the end of the experiment was quantitated and related to the bioelectric potentials recorded at current-on and current-off states, respectively. Direct current stimulation resulted in electronegative potential spike centered on the cathode tip while current was applied. After electrical stimulation was turned off, the residual potentials at the end of the experiment did not significantly differ from the initial values. Conversely, the time sequence of the changes was significantly different from the control to the experimental group. The variations in the induced potentials at current-on state were significantly related to the variations in bone formation. This study suggests the existence of a relationship among bioelectric potentials, DC stimulation, and osteogenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3357083     DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100060305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  8 in total

Review 1.  Bone healing in 2016.

Authors:  John A Buza; Thomas Einhorn
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2016-10-05

Review 2.  Electrical implications of corrosion for osseointegration of titanium implants.

Authors:  R A Gittens; R Olivares-Navarrete; R Tannenbaum; B D Boyan; Z Schwartz
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 3.  Electrical stimulation-based bone fracture treatment, if it works so well why do not more surgeons use it?

Authors:  Mit Balvantray Bhavsar; Zhihua Han; Thomas DeCoster; Liudmila Leppik; Karla Mychellyne Costa Oliveira; John H Barker
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  Effect of compliant layers within piezoelectric composites on power generation providing electrical stimulation in low frequency applications.

Authors:  E D Krech; E S Cadel; R M Barrett; E A Friis
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2018-08-21

5.  Macrophage Biocompatibility of CoCr Wear Particles Produced under Polarization in Hyaluronic Acid Aqueous Solution.

Authors:  Blanca Teresa Perez-Maceda; María Encarnación López-Fernández; Iván Díaz; Aaron Kavanaugh; Fabrizio Billi; María Lorenza Escudero; María Cristina García-Alonso; Rosa María Lozano
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Changes in the extracellular microenvironment and osteogenic responses of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells induced by in vitro direct electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Kasama Srirussamee; Ruikang Xue; Sahba Mobini; Nigel J Cassidy; Sarah H Cartmell
Journal:  J Tissue Eng       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 7.813

Review 7.  Electronic Bone Growth Stimulators for Augmentation of Osteogenesis in In Vitro and In Vivo Models: A Narrative Review of Electrical Stimulation Mechanisms and Device Specifications.

Authors:  Peter J Nicksic; D'Andrea T Donnelly; Madison Hesse; Simran Bedi; Nishant Verma; Allison J Seitz; Andrew J Shoffstall; Kip A Ludwig; Aaron M Dingle; Samuel O Poore
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-02-14

8.  The science of electrical stimulation therapy for fracture healing.

Authors:  Paul Rt Kuzyk; Emil H Schemitsch
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.251

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.