| Literature DB >> 33569504 |
Berta Saez-Gimenez1,2, Miriam Barrecheguren1,2, Maria Antònia Ramon1,3, Alba Gomez-Garrido4, Carlos Bravo1,3, Víctor Monforte1,3, Manuel López-Meseguer1, Cristina Berastegui1, Eva Revilla1, Christian Romero1, Rosalía Laporta5, Sonia Fernández-Rozas6, Javier Redel-Montero7, Amparo Solé8, Mercedes de la Torre9, Luis Puente10, Antonio Roman1,3, Susana Gómez-Ollés1,3,2, Iñigo Ojanguren1,3,2.
Abstract
The clinical course of lung transplantation (LT) is diverse: some patients present chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) and progressive decline in pulmonary function, but others maintain normal spirometric values and active lives.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33569504 PMCID: PMC7861034 DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00381-2020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ERJ Open Res ISSN: 2312-0541
Clinical characteristics of lung transplant (LT) recipients
| 29 | |
| 48.7±13.6 | |
| 14 (48) | |
| 34.7±14.0 | |
| 14.0±3.1 | |
| COPD | 3±10.3 |
| ILD | 4±13.7 |
| CF | 14±48.3 |
| Bronchiectasis | 1±3.5 |
| PH | 1±3.5 |
| Other | 6±20.7 |
| 21.6±5.6 | |
| 16.6±4.1 | |
| 13.3±1.5 | |
| 15 (51.7) | |
| 6 (20.7) | |
| 11 (37.9) | |
| Never smoked | 21 (72.4) |
| Former smoker | 8 (27.6) |
| Packs per year | 29.7±23.4 |
| FVC L | 3.9±0.92 |
| FVC % predicted | 92.6±15.7 |
| FEV1 L | 3.1±0.7 |
| FEV1 % predicted | 97.9±14.5 |
| | 77.1 (70–83.3) |
| TLC % predicted | 96.1±18.3 |
| RV % predicted | 81.0±8.5 |
| 28 (96.6) | |
| 3.9±1.6 | |
Data are presented as mean±sd, unless otherwise stated. Some variables have missing values: eight in FFMI, one in packs per year and one in corticosteroid dosage. ILD: interstitial lung disease; CF: cystic fibrosis; PH: pulmonary hypertension; BMI: body mass index; FFMI: fat-free mass index; FVC: forced vital capacity; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 s; DLCO: diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide; IQR: interquartile range; TLC: total lung capacity; RV: residual volume.
Exercise capacity, physical activity and quality of life of lung transplant (LT) recipients
| 29 | |
| 21.49±6.68 | |
| 75.24±15.6 | |
| 48.6±10.1 | |
| 1.68 (1.43–2.06) | |
| 111.14±37.13 | |
| 32 (31–35) | |
| 54 (48–67.1) | |
| 1.35 (1.25–1.4) | |
| 141.5±21.4 | |
| 17.5±13.6 | |
| 90.5±19.4 | |
| 52 (48–57) | |
| 97.6±0.8 | |
| 7.35±1.89 | |
| 5497 (4007–9832) | |
| 1 (0.95–1) | |
| 29±100 | |
Data are presented as mean±sd, unless otherwise stated.
VO2: oxygen uptake; VCO2: carbon dioxide output; IQR: interquartile range; AT: aerobic threshold; VE: minute ventilation; RER: respiratory exchange ratio; HR: heart rate; HRR: heart rate reserve; VR: ventilator reserve; IPAQ: International Physical Activity Questionnaire.
FIGURE 1Correlations between peak oxygen uptake (V′O) (% predicted) and a) forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) (% predicted), b) forced vital capacity (FVC) (% predicted), c) total lung capacity (TLC) (% predicted) and d) diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) (% predicted).
FIGURE 2Correlations between maximum work rate (WRmax) (watts) and a) age, b) haemoglobin (Hb) and c) forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) (L).
Results of stepwise multiple regression analysis for maximal oxygen uptake (V′O) and maximum workload
| −0.249 (−0.37–−0.13) | <0.001 | −0.24 (−1.17–0.69) | 0.599 | |
| 5.35 (2.19–8.51) | 0.002 | 4.72 (−34.75–25.30) | 0.748 | |
| 9.62 (2.21–17.02) | 0.013 | |||
| 31.53 (8.88–54.17) | 0.008 | |||
| 0.26 (0.15–0.36) | <0.001 | |||
| 18.87 (16.80–20.95) | <0.001 | |||
| 0.685 | 0.580 | |||
FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 s; DLCO: diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide.
FIGURE 3Adjusted predicted maximal oxygen uptake (V′O) values (and 95% confidence interval) against diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO).
FIGURE 4Adjusted predicted maximum work rate (WRmax) values (and 95% confidence interval) against haemoglobin (Hb).