Literature DB >> 17258154

Long-term health-related quality of life after lung transplantation: different predictors for different dimensions.

Karin M Vermuelen1, Wim van der Bij, Michiel E Erasmus, Elisabeth M TenVergert.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lung transplantation has proven to be an effective treatment option for patients with end-stage lung disease with profound effects on both survival and health-related quality of life (HRQL). Generally, studies have reported improved HRQL after lung transplantation. When assessing HRQL, physical, psychologic or social dimensions are usually included. However, it is unclear what predicts outcome, to what extent, and whether there are differences in predictors between dimensions of HRQL. Knowledge about these predictors may be useful when making choices regarding therapy. The research question in the present study was: What are the predicting variables of physical and psychologic dimensions of HRQL, and do they differ?
METHODS: Results from studies of the physical dimension (the Nottingham Health Profile's energy and mobility scales) and the psychologic dimension (Zung depression and STAI anxiety scores) from 140 transplanted patients with a maximum follow-up of almost 10 years were assessed using mixed-model analysis. For both dimensions, the following variables were tested for their predictive value: age; gender; diagnosis; year of transplantation; time on the waiting list; type of transplantation; bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome; and pre-transplant HRQL scores.
RESULTS: With regard to the physical dimension after lung transplantation, presence of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), age and pre-transplant scores on the measure under study were significant predictors for both energy and mobility. For mobility, gender appeared to be an additional predictor. With regard to the psychologic dimension after lung transplantation, BOS was a predictor for both anxiety and depression. Pre-transplant depression was an additional predictor for post-transplant depression, and age was an additional predictor for anxiety.
CONCLUSIONS: Several variables were identified that predicted HRQL after lung transplantation. These variables differed between the physical and psychologic dimensions. The presence of BOS was a predictor for both dimensions. The present findings may be helpful when choosing or developing interventions aimed at improving HRQL after lung transplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17258154     DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2006.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  13 in total

Review 1.  A thematic analysis of quality of life in lung transplant: the existing evidence and implications for future directions.

Authors:  J P Singer; J Chen; P D Blanc; L E Leard; J Kukreja; H Chen
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 2.  [Chronic rejection: Differences and similarities in various solid organ transplants].

Authors:  H Suhling; J Gottlieb; C Bara; R Taubert; E Jäckel; M Schiffer; J H Bräsen
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 3.  Quality of life in lung transplantation.

Authors:  Jonathan P Singer; Lianne G Singer
Journal:  Semin Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 3.119

4.  Donor factors are associated with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after lung transplantation.

Authors:  Sara A Hennessy; Tjasa Hranjec; Brian R Swenson; Benjamin D Kozower; David R Jones; Gorav Ailawadi; Irving L Kron; Christine L Lau
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Quality of life of childbearing age women and its associated factors: an application of seemingly unrelated regression (SUR) models.

Authors:  Sareh Keshavarzi; Seyyed Mohammad Taghi Ayatollahi; Najaf Zare; Farkhondeh Sharif
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Feasibility of internet-based health-related quality of life data collection in a large patient cohort.

Authors:  Sacha Bhinder; Noori Chowdhury; John Granton; Murray Krahn; D Elizabeth Tullis; Thomas K Waddell; Lianne G Singer
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Coping and quality of life in patients awaiting lung transplantation.

Authors:  Jessica L Taylor; Patrick J Smith; Michael A Babyak; Krista A Barbour; Benson M Hoffman; Deborah L Sebring; R Duane Davis; Scott M Palmer; Francis J Keefe; Robert M Carney; Iris Csik; Kenneth E Freedland; James A Blumenthal
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 8.  Technology and outcomes assessment in lung transplantation.

Authors:  Roger D Yusen
Journal:  Proc Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2009-01-15

Review 9.  Psychosocial issues facing lung transplant candidates, recipients and family caregivers.

Authors:  Emily M Rosenberger; Mary Amanda Dew; Andrea F DiMartini; Annette J DeVito Dabbs; Roger D Yusen
Journal:  Thorac Surg Clin       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.750

10.  Is SAPS 3 better than APACHE II at predicting mortality in critically ill transplant patients?

Authors:  Vanessa M de Oliveira; Janete S Brauner; Edison Rodrigues Filho; Ruth G A Susin; Viviane Draghetti; Simone T Bolzan; Silvia R R Vieira
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.