BACKGROUND: The lung function of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) has not been characterized in detail. objective: To characterize the heterogeneous physiological abnormalities that exist in patients with IPF during their initial clinical evaluation. METHODS: Lung function tests from 93 patients, performed within six months of the initial diagnosis of IPF, were obtained from a referral pulmonary function laboratory at a tertiary care hospital in Canada. A restrictive pattern was defined as total lung capacity (TLC) <95th percentile of predicted value. Patients with obstructive lung disease, lung cancer, emphysema and other restrictive lung diseases were excluded. RESULTS: On diagnosis, 73% of patients with IPF had a restrictive pattern, with a mean TLC of 72% of predicted. Mean forced vital capacity (FVC) was 71% and 44% of patients had an FVC <95th percentile. Mean diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) was 60% and DLCO⁄alveolar volume (VA) 92% of predicted. Increased severity of restriction - based on TLC - was associated with lower DLCO (74% of predicted in mild restriction and 39% of predicted in severe restriction) and higher forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)⁄FVC ratio (82% of predicted in mild restriction and 90% of predicted in severe restriction) but not with age (76 years in mild restriction and 69 years in severe restriction). Regardless of severity of restriction, the average DLCO⁄VA (≥86% of predicted) remained within normal limits. CONCLUSIONS: One in four patients with IPF had normal TLC and more than one-half had a normal FVC during initial evaluation. As the severity of the restriction increased, FEV1⁄FVC increased, DLCO decreased but DLCO⁄VA remained normal.
BACKGROUND: The lung function of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) has not been characterized in detail. objective: To characterize the heterogeneous physiological abnormalities that exist in patients with IPF during their initial clinical evaluation. METHODS: Lung function tests from 93 patients, performed within six months of the initial diagnosis of IPF, were obtained from a referral pulmonary function laboratory at a tertiary care hospital in Canada. A restrictive pattern was defined as total lung capacity (TLC) <95th percentile of predicted value. Patients with obstructive lung disease, lung cancer, emphysema and other restrictive lung diseases were excluded. RESULTS: On diagnosis, 73% of patients with IPF had a restrictive pattern, with a mean TLC of 72% of predicted. Mean forced vital capacity (FVC) was 71% and 44% of patients had an FVC <95th percentile. Mean diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) was 60% and DLCO⁄alveolar volume (VA) 92% of predicted. Increased severity of restriction - based on TLC - was associated with lower DLCO (74% of predicted in mild restriction and 39% of predicted in severe restriction) and higher forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)⁄FVC ratio (82% of predicted in mild restriction and 90% of predicted in severe restriction) but not with age (76 years in mild restriction and 69 years in severe restriction). Regardless of severity of restriction, the average DLCO⁄VA (≥86% of predicted) remained within normal limits. CONCLUSIONS: One in four patients with IPF had normal TLC and more than one-half had a normal FVC during initial evaluation. As the severity of the restriction increased, FEV1⁄FVC increased, DLCO decreased but DLCO⁄VA remained normal.
Authors: R Pellegrino; G Viegi; V Brusasco; R O Crapo; F Burgos; R Casaburi; A Coates; C P M van der Grinten; P Gustafsson; J Hankinson; R Jensen; D C Johnson; N MacIntyre; R McKay; M R Miller; D Navajas; O F Pedersen; J Wanger Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: J Wanger; J L Clausen; A Coates; O F Pedersen; V Brusasco; F Burgos; R Casaburi; R Crapo; P Enright; C P M van der Grinten; P Gustafsson; J Hankinson; R Jensen; D Johnson; N Macintyre; R McKay; M R Miller; D Navajas; R Pellegrino; G Viegi Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: S E Gay; E A Kazerooni; G B Toews; J P Lynch; B H Gross; P N Cascade; D L Spizarny; A Flint; M A Schork; R I Whyte; J Popovich; R Hyzy; F J Martinez Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1998-04 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Yangjin Jegal; Dong Soon Kim; Tae Sun Shim; Chae-Man Lim; Sang Do Lee; Younsuck Koh; Woo Sung Kim; Won Dong Kim; Jin Seong Lee; William D Travis; Masanori Kitaichi; Thomas V Colby Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2005-01-07 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Craig E Daniels; Joseph A Lasky; Andrew H Limper; Kathleen Mieras; Edith Gabor; Darrell R Schroeder Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2009-12-10 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Denis E O'Donnell; Amany F Elbehairy; Danilo C Berton; Nicolle J Domnik; J Alberto Neder Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2017-02-22 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Berta Saez-Gimenez; Miriam Barrecheguren; Maria Antònia Ramon; Alba Gomez-Garrido; Carlos Bravo; Víctor Monforte; Manuel López-Meseguer; Cristina Berastegui; Eva Revilla; Christian Romero; Rosalía Laporta; Sonia Fernández-Rozas; Javier Redel-Montero; Amparo Solé; Mercedes de la Torre; Luis Puente; Antonio Roman; Susana Gómez-Ollés; Iñigo Ojanguren Journal: ERJ Open Res Date: 2021-02-01