Literature DB >> 33568732

Structured team-oriented program to follow patients after vena cava filter placement: a step forward in improving quality for filter retrieval.

Salah D Qanadli1, Kiara Rezaei-Kalantari2, Laurence Crivelli3, Francesco Doenz3, Anne-Marie Jouannic3, David C Rotzinger4.   

Abstract

To reduce inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) related complications, retrieval is recommended whenever possible. Nevertheless, IVCF retrieval rates remain lower than expected, likely due to insufficient follow-up after placement. We evaluated the value of a structured program designed to follow patients by the interventional radiology team up to 5 months after IVCF placement. We prospectively enrolled 366 consecutive patients (mean age 64 ± 17 years; 201 men and 165 women) who benefited from IVCF between March 2015 and February 2020. The program consisted of advising the patient and clinicians to consider IVCF retrieval as soon as possible (standard workflow) and systematically planning an additional follow-up visit at 5-month. Clinical and technical eligibility, as well as technical success for retrieval (TSR) were evaluated. At 5-months, 38 (10.4%) patients were lost to follow-up, and 47 (12.8%) had died. Among survivors, the overall retrieval rate was 58%. The retrieval rates were 83% and 97% for the clinically eligible and technically eligible patients for retrieval, respectively. The 5-month visit enabled 89 additional retrievals (47.8%) compared to the standard workflow. No significant difference was seen in TSR before and after 5 months (p = 0.95). Improved patient tracking with a dedicated IVCF program results in an effective process to identify suitable patients for retrieval and drastically improves retrieval rates in eligible patients. Involving interventionalists in the process improved IVCF patient management.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33568732      PMCID: PMC7875966          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-82767-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  31 in total

1.  Guidelines for the use of retrievable and convertible vena cava filters: report from the Society of Interventional Radiology multidisciplinary consensus conference.

Authors:  John A Kaufman; Thomas B Kinney; Michael B Streiff; Ronald F Sing; Mary C Proctor; Daniel Becker; Mark Cipolle; Anthony J Comerota; Steven F Millward; Frederick B Rogers; David Sacks; Anthony C Venbrux
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 2.  Complications of inferior vena cava filters.

Authors:  David M Sella; W Andrew Oldenburg
Journal:  Semin Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Inferior vena cava filters: truth or dare?

Authors:  Ido Weinberg; Michael R Jaff
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 6.546

4.  Data Desert for Inferior Vena Caval Filters: Limited Evidence, Supervision, and Research.

Authors:  Behnood Bikdeli; Joseph S Ross; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 14.676

5.  Outcomes after Vena Cava Filter Use in Patients with Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism and Contraindications to Anticoagulation.

Authors:  Andrés Quezada; David Jiménez; Behnood Bikdeli; Alfonso Muriel; Mario Aramberri; Luciano López-Jiménez; Joan Carles Sahuquillo; Remedios Otero; Angelo Porfidia; Manuel Monreal
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 5.249

6.  Decreasing Utilization of Inferior Vena Cava Filters in Post-FDA Warning Era: Insights From 2005 to 2014 Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

Authors:  Vibhor Wadhwa; Premal S Trivedi; Kshitij Chatterjee; Anobel Tamrazi; Kelvin Hong; Mark L Lessne; Robert K Ryu
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 5.532

7.  Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement and Retrieval Rates among Radiologists and Nonradiologists.

Authors:  David Guez; David R Hansberry; David J Eschelman; Carin F Gonsalves; Laurence Parker; Vijay M Rao; David C Levin
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 8.  Inferior vena cava filter retrievals, standard and novel techniques.

Authors:  Gokhan Kuyumcu; T Gregory Walker
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2016-12

9.  A policy of dedicated follow-up improves the rate of removal of retrievable inferior Vena Cava Filters in trauma patients.

Authors:  Terence O'Keeffe; Joby J Thekkumel; Susan Friese; Shahid Shafi; Shellie C Josephs
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 0.688

10.  Retrievability of the Günther Tulip vena cava filter after dwell times longer than 180 days in patients with multiple trauma.

Authors:  David Rosenthal; Eric D Wellons; Susan M Hancock; Allison B Burkett
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.487

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Vena Cava Filters: Toward Optimal Strategies for Filter Retrieval and Patients' Follow-Up.

Authors:  Kiara Rezaei-Kalantari; David C Rotzinger; Salah D Qanadli
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.