Literature DB >> 21396316

A policy of dedicated follow-up improves the rate of removal of retrievable inferior Vena Cava Filters in trauma patients.

Terence O'Keeffe1, Joby J Thekkumel, Susan Friese, Shahid Shafi, Shellie C Josephs.   

Abstract

Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava Filters (IVCF) for prophylaxis against pulmonary embolus have been associated with low rates of removal. Strategies for improving the rates of retrieval have not been described. We hypothesized that a policy of dedicated follow-up would achieve a higher rate of filter removal. Trauma and Nontrauma patients who had a retrievable IVCF placed during 2006 were identified. A protocol existed for trauma patients with chart stickers, arm bracelets, and dedicated follow-up by nurse practitioners from three trauma teams. No protocol existed for nontrauma patients. Statistical analysis was performed using χ(2) analysis or analysis of variance. One hundred sixty-seven retrievable IVCFs were placed over 12 months; 91 in trauma patients and 76 in nontrauma patients. Trauma patients were more likely to have their IVCF removed than nontrauma patients, 55 per cent versus 19 per cent, P < 0.001. There were differences between the three trauma teams, with removal rates of 44 per cent, 42 per cent, and 86 per cent respectively (P < 0.05). On multivariate analysis young age and trauma patient status were independent predictors of filter removal. A policy of dedicated follow-up of patients with IVCFs can achieve significantly higher rates of filter removal than have been previously reported. Similar policies should be adopted by all centers placing retrievable IVCFs to maximize retrieval rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21396316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  7 in total

1.  Improving the tracking and removal of retrievable inferior vena cava filters.

Authors:  Anthony D Goei; Shellie C Josephs; Thomas B Kinney; Charles E Ray; David Sacks
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 2.  Inferior vena cava filters: current best practices.

Authors:  Anita Rajasekhar
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Persistently low inferior vena cava filter retrieval rates in a population-based cohort.

Authors:  Abhisekh Mohapatra; Nathan L Liang; Rabih A Chaer; Edith Tzeng
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord       Date:  2018-11-12

4.  Improving the retrieval rate of inferior vena cava filters with a multidisciplinary team approach.

Authors:  Elica Inagaki; Alik Farber; Mohammad H Eslami; Jeffrey J Siracuse; Denis V Rybin; Shayna Sarosiek; J Mark Sloan; Jeffrey Kalish
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord       Date:  2016-02-28

5.  Practice Patterns of Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement and Factors That Predict Retrieval Rates: A Single-Center Institution and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Ming Y Lim; Ricardo Yamada; Marcelo Guimaraes; Charles S Greenberg
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2018-09-10

6.  Structured team-oriented program to follow patients after vena cava filter placement: a step forward in improving quality for filter retrieval.

Authors:  Salah D Qanadli; Kiara Rezaei-Kalantari; Laurence Crivelli; Francesco Doenz; Anne-Marie Jouannic; David C Rotzinger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Vena Cava Filters: Toward Optimal Strategies for Filter Retrieval and Patients' Follow-Up.

Authors:  Kiara Rezaei-Kalantari; David C Rotzinger; Salah D Qanadli
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.