Literature DB >> 29305114

Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement and Retrieval Rates among Radiologists and Nonradiologists.

David Guez1, David R Hansberry2, David J Eschelman2, Carin F Gonsalves2, Laurence Parker2, Vijay M Rao2, David C Levin2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement and retrieval rates among radiologists, vascular surgeons, cardiologists, other surgeons, and all other health care providers for Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries in the years 2012-2015.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The nationwide Medicare Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary Master Files were used to determine the volume and utilization rate of IVC filter placement, IVC filter repositioning, and IVC filter retrieval, which correspond to procedure codes 37191, 37192, and 37193, respectively. Procedural code 37193 was not available before 2012, so data were reviewed for the years 2012-2015.
RESULTS: The total volume of Medicare IVC filter placement decreased from 57,785 in 2012 to 44,378 in 2015, with radiologists responsible for 60% of all filter placements. Volume of IVC filter placement declined across all specialties, including radiologists, who placed 33,744 in 2012 and 27,957 in 2015. In contrast, total retrieval of IVC filters increased from 4,060 removals in 2012 to 6,166 in 2015. Retrieval rate per 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries increased from 11 in 2012 to 16 in 2015. Radiologists removed the bulk of the filters: 64% in both 2012 and 2015. Vascular surgeons, cardiologists, and other surgeons retrieved, respectively, 20%, 10%, and 5% of all IVC filters in 2012 and 22%, 9%, and 5% in 2015.
CONCLUSIONS: From 2012 to 2015, IVC filter placement steadily decreased across all specialties. Retrieval rate of IVC filters continued to rise over the same period. Radiologists were responsible for the majority of IVC filter placements and retrievals.
Copyright © 2017 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29305114     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  6 in total

1.  Structured team-oriented program to follow patients after vena cava filter placement: a step forward in improving quality for filter retrieval.

Authors:  Salah D Qanadli; Kiara Rezaei-Kalantari; Laurence Crivelli; Francesco Doenz; Anne-Marie Jouannic; David C Rotzinger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Comparative outcomes of Inferior Vena Cava filters placed at bedside using digital radiography versus conventional fluoroscopy.

Authors:  John A Walker; Matthew Milam; Jorge E Lopera
Journal:  J Interv Med       Date:  2021-05-12

Review 3.  Vena Cava Filters: Toward Optimal Strategies for Filter Retrieval and Patients' Follow-Up.

Authors:  Kiara Rezaei-Kalantari; David C Rotzinger; Salah D Qanadli
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-03

4.  Tulip piercing the aorta: a rare case of IVC filter aortic perforation and obstruction.

Authors:  Kshitij Desai; Jason Cook; Evan Brownie; Mohamed Zayed
Journal:  J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2018-10-29

5.  The role of an IVC filter retrieval clinic-A single center retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Philip A Schuchardt; Junaid T Yasin; Ryan M Davis; Sanjit O Tewari; Ambarish P Bhat
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2019-12-31

6.  Extensive Inferior Vena Cava Thrombosis Related to COVID-19 Infection in a Patient with Retrievable Filter Due to Multiple Pelvic Bone Fractures.

Authors:  George S Georgiadis; Christos Argyriou; Stylianos Tottas; Soultana Foutzitzi; Georgios Drosos
Journal:  Vasc Specialist Int       Date:  2022-03-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.