Literature DB >> 33568346

A Randomized Phase II Study of Coexpression Extrapolation (COXEN) with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Bladder Cancer (SWOG S1314; NCT02177695).

Thomas W Flaig1, Catherine M Tangen2, Siamak Daneshmand3, Ajjai Alva4, Seth P Lerner5, M Scott Lucia6, David J McConkey7, Dan Theodorescu8, Amir Goldkorn9, Matthew I Milowsky10, Rick Bangs11, Gary R MacVicar12, Bruno R Bastos13, Jared S Fowles14, Daniel L Gustafson14, Melissa Plets2, Ian M Thompson15.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Dose-dense methotrexate-vinblastine-adriamycin-cisplatin (ddMVAC) and gemcitabine-cisplatin (GC) are accepted neoadjuvant regimens for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. The aim of this study was to validate the score from a coexpression extrapolation (COXEN) algorithm-generated gene expression model (GEM) as a biomarker in patients undergoing radical cystectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligibility included cT2-T4a N0 M0, urothelial bladder cancer, ≥ 5 mm of viable tumor, cisplatin eligible, with plan for cystectomy; 237 patients were randomized between ddMVAC, given every 14 days for four cycles, and GC, given every 21 days for four cycles. The primary objective assessed prespecified dichotomous treatment-specific COXEN score as predictive of pT0 rate or ≤ pT1 (downstaging) at surgery.
RESULTS: Among 167 evaluable patients, the OR for pT0 with the GC GEM score in GC-treated patients was 2.63 [P = 0.10; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.82-8.36]; for the ddMVAC COXEN GEM score with ddMVAC treatment, the OR was 1.12 (P = 0.82, 95% CI, 0.42-2.95). The GC GEM score was applied to pooled arms (GC and ddMVAC) for downstaging with an OR of 2.33 (P = 0.02; 95% CI, 1.11-4.89). In an intention-to-treat analysis of eligible patients (n = 227), pT0 rates for ddMVAC and GC were 28% and 30% (P = 0.75); downstaging was 47% and 40% (P = 0.27), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment-specific COXEN scores were not significantly predictive for response to individual chemotherapy treatment. The COXEN GEM GC score was significantly associated with downstaging in the pooled arms. Additional biomarker development is planned. ©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33568346      PMCID: PMC8219246          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-2409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  15 in total

1.  Cancer statistics, 2019.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  Frozen robust multiarray analysis (fRMA).

Authors:  Matthew N McCall; Benjamin M Bolstad; Rafael A Irizarry
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Seven year update of an EORTC phase III trial of high-dose intensity M-VAC chemotherapy and G-CSF versus classic M-VAC in advanced urothelial tract tumours.

Authors:  C N Sternberg; P de Mulder; J H Schornagel; C Theodore; S D Fossa; A T van Oosterom; J A Witjes; M Spina; C J van Groeningen; B Duclos; J T Roberts; C de Balincourt; L Collette
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  A 20-gene model for molecular nodal staging of bladder cancer: development and prospective assessment.

Authors:  Steven Christopher Smith; Alexander Spyridon Baras; Garrett Dancik; Yuanbin Ru; Kuan-Fu Ding; Christopher A Moskaluk; Yves Fradet; Jan Lehmann; Michael Stöckle; Arndt Hartmann; Jae K Lee; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Gemcitabine and cisplatin versus methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in advanced or metastatic bladder cancer: results of a large, randomized, multinational, multicenter, phase III study.

Authors:  H von der Maase; S W Hansen; J T Roberts; L Dogliotti; T Oliver; M J Moore; I Bodrogi; P Albers; A Knuth; C M Lippert; P Kerbrat; P Sanchez Rovira; P Wersall; S P Cleall; D F Roychowdhury; I Tomlin; C M Visseren-Grul; P F Conte
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  The COXEN principle: translating signatures of in vitro chemosensitivity into tools for clinical outcome prediction and drug discovery in cancer.

Authors:  Steven C Smith; Alexander S Baras; Jae K Lee; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Quality of pathologic response and surgery correlate with survival for patients with completely resected bladder cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Guru Sonpavde; Bryan H Goldman; V O Speights; Seth P Lerner; David P Wood; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Donald L Trump; Ronald B Natale; H Barton Grossman; E David Crawford
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Trends in the utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: results from the National Cancer Database.

Authors:  Harras B Zaid; Sanjay G Patel; C J Stimson; Matthew J Resnick; Michael S Cookson; Daniel A Barocas; Sam S Chang
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Neoadjuvant dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin with pegfilgrastim support in muscle-invasive urothelial cancer: pathologic, radiologic, and biomarker correlates.

Authors:  Toni K Choueiri; Susanna Jacobus; Joaquim Bellmunt; Angela Qu; Leonard J Appleman; Christopher Tretter; Glenn J Bubley; Edward C Stack; Sabina Signoretti; Meghara Walsh; Graeme Steele; Michelle Hirsch; Christopher J Sweeney; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Adam S Kibel; Katherine M Krajewski; Philip W Kantoff; Robert W Ross; Jonathan E Rosenberg
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  NCCN Guidelines Insights: Bladder Cancer, Version 5.2018.

Authors:  Thomas W Flaig; Philippe E Spiess; Neeraj Agarwal; Rick Bangs; Stephen A Boorjian; Mark K Buyyounouski; Tracy M Downs; Jason A Efstathiou; Terence Friedlander; Richard E Greenberg; Khurshid A Guru; Noah Hahn; Harry W Herr; Christopher Hoimes; Brant A Inman; Masahito Jimbo; A Karim Kader; Subodh M Lele; Joshua J Meeks; Jeff Michalski; Jeffrey S Montgomery; Lance C Pagliaro; Sumanta K Pal; Anthony Patterson; Daniel P Petrylak; Elizabeth R Plimack; Kamal S Pohar; Michael P Porter; Mark A Preston; Wade J Sexton; Arlene O Siefker-Radtke; Jonathan Tward; Geoffrey Wile; Alyse Johnson-Chilla; Mary A Dwyer; Lisa A Gurski
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 11.908

View more
  6 in total

1.  Prospective clinical trial testing COXEN-based gene expression models of chemosensitivity in dogs with spontaneous osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Daniel L Gustafson; Keagan P Collins; Jared S Fowles; E J Ehrhart; Kristen M Weishaar; Sunetra Das; Dawn L Duval; Douglas H Thamm
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 3.333

2.  Phase II Study of Gemcitabine and Split-Dose Cisplatin Plus Pembrolizumab as Neoadjuvant Therapy Before Radical Cystectomy in Patients With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Tracy L Rose; Michael R Harrison; Allison M Deal; Sundhar Ramalingam; Young E Whang; Blaine Brower; Mary Dunn; Chelsea K Osterman; Hillary M Heiling; Marc A Bjurlin; Angela B Smith; Matthew E Nielsen; Hung-Jui Tan; Eric Wallen; Michael E Woods; Daniel George; Tian Zhang; Anthony Drier; William Y Kim; Matthew I Milowsky
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 50.717

3.  Management Trends and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy for Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: Evolution of the University of Southern California Experience over 3,347 Cases.

Authors:  Anirban P Mitra; Jie Cai; Gus Miranda; Sumeet Bhanvadia; David I Quinn; Anne K Schuckman; Hooman Djaladat; Siamak Daneshmand
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Curative Effect and Survival Assessment Comparing Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Versus Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin and Cisplatin as Neoadjuvant Therapy for Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tiange Wu; Yuqing Wu; Shuqiu Chen; Jianping Wu; Weidong Zhu; Hui Liu; Ming Chen; Bin Xu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 5.  Molecular Subtypes as a Basis for Stratified Use of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer-A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Gottfrid Sjödahl; Johan Abrahamsson; Carina Bernardo; Pontus Eriksson; Mattias Höglund; Fredrik Liedberg
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Three vs. Four Cycles of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Localized Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Undergoing Radical Cystectomy: A Retrospective Multi-Institutional Analysis.

Authors:  Matteo Ferro; Ottavio de Cobelli; Gennaro Musi; Giuseppe Lucarelli; Daniela Terracciano; Daniela Pacella; Tommaso Muto; Angelo Porreca; Gian Maria Busetto; Francesco Del Giudice; Francesco Soria; Paolo Gontero; Francesco Cantiello; Rocco Damiano; Fabio Crocerossa; Abdal Rahman Abu Farhan; Riccardo Autorino; Mihai Dorin Vartolomei; Matteo Muto; Michele Marchioni; Andrea Mari; Luca Scafuri; Andrea Minervini; Nicola Longo; Francesco Chiancone; Sisto Perdona; Pietro De Placido; Antonio Verde; Michele Catellani; Stefano Luzzago; Francesco Alessandro Mistretta; Pasquale Ditonno; Vincenzo Francesco Caputo; Michele Battaglia; Stefania Zamboni; Alessandro Antonelli; Francesco Greco; Giorgio Ivan Russo; Rodolfo Hurle; Nicolae Crisan; Matteo Manfredi; Francesco Porpiglia; Giuseppe Di Lorenzo; Felice Crocetto; Carlo Buonerba
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 6.244

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.