Literature DB >> 16330205

Seven year update of an EORTC phase III trial of high-dose intensity M-VAC chemotherapy and G-CSF versus classic M-VAC in advanced urothelial tract tumours.

C N Sternberg1, P de Mulder, J H Schornagel, C Theodore, S D Fossa, A T van Oosterom, J A Witjes, M Spina, C J van Groeningen, B Duclos, J T Roberts, C de Balincourt, L Collette.   

Abstract

EORTC protocol 30924 is an international randomized trial reporting a 7.3 year update of a 2 weekly regimen of high-dose intensity chemotherapy with M-VAC plus granulocyte colony stimulating factor (HD-M-VAC) compared to classic M-VAC in advanced transitional cell carcinoma (TCC). Two hundred and sixty three untreated patients with bidimensionally measurable TCC were included. In an intention to treat analysis, there were 28 complete responses (CR) (21%) and 55 partial responses (PR) (41%), for an overall response rate (RR) of 64% on the HD-M-VAC arm. On M-VAC, there were 12 CR (9%) and 53 PR (41%), for an overall RR of 50% . The P-value for the difference in CR was 0.009; and for RR, was 0.06. After a median follow-up of 7.3 years, 24.6% are alive on the HD-M-VAC arm vs. 13.2% on the M-VAC arm. Median progression-free survival was better with HD-MVAC (9.5 months) vs. M-VAC (8.1 months). The mortality hazard ratio (HR) was 0.76. The 2-year survival rate for HD-M-VAC was 36.7% vs. 26.2% for M-VAC. At 5 years, the survival rate was 21.8% in the HD-M-VAC vs. 13.5%. Median survival was 15.1 months on HD-MVAC and 14.9 months on M-VAC. There was one death from toxicity in each arm; and more patients died to malignant disease in the M-VAC arm (76%) than in the HD-M-VAC arm (64.9%). With longer follow-up initial results have been confirmed, and shows that HD-M-VAC produces a borderline statistically significant relative reduction in the risk of progression and death compared to M-VAC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16330205     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.08.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  126 in total

1.  Transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: new approaches to the treatment of advanced disease.

Authors:  D P Petrylak
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Randomized phase II/III trial assessing gemcitabine/carboplatin and methotrexate/carboplatin/vinblastine in patients with advanced urothelial cancer who are unfit for cisplatin-based chemotherapy: EORTC study 30986.

Authors:  Maria De Santis; Joaquim Bellmunt; Graham Mead; J Martijn Kerst; Michael Leahy; Pablo Maroto; Thierry Gil; Sandrine Marreaud; Gedske Daugaard; Iwona Skoneczna; Sandra Collette; Julie Lorent; Ronald de Wit; Richard Sylvester
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Current management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  G Sancho; P Maroto; J Palou
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 4.  Comparing how significantly the pharmacological treatment of genitourinary cancer in a non-curative setting affects endpoints of survival or response.

Authors:  David R Yates; Morgan Rouprêt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer: an update on systemic therapy.

Authors:  Hayley Knollman; J Luke Godwin; Rishi Jain; Yu-Ning Wong; Elizabeth R Plimack; Daniel M Geynisman
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2015-12

6.  The Impact of Cisplatin- or Non-Cisplatin-Containing Chemotherapy on Long-Term and Conditional Survival of Patients with Advanced Urinary Tract Cancer.

Authors:  Aristotelis Bamias; Kimon Tzannis; Christina Bamia; Lauren C Harshman; Simon Crabb; Elizabeth R Plimack; Sumanta Pal; Ugo De Giorgi; Sylvain Ladoire; Christine Theodore; Neeraj Agarwal; Evan Y Yu; Guenter Niegisch; Cora N Sternberg; Sandy Srinivas; Ulka Vaishampayan; Andrea Necchi; Michalis Liontos; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Thomas Powles; Joaquim Bellmunt; Matthew D Galsky
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-04-01

7.  NCCN Guidelines Insights: Bladder Cancer, Version 2.2016.

Authors:  Peter E Clark; Philippe E Spiess; Neeraj Agarwal; Rick Bangs; Stephen A Boorjian; Mark K Buyyounouski; Jason A Efstathiou; Thomas W Flaig; Terence Friedlander; Richard E Greenberg; Khurshid A Guru; Noah Hahn; Harry W Herr; Christopher Hoimes; Brant A Inman; A Karim Kader; Adam S Kibel; Timothy M Kuzel; Subodh M Lele; Joshua J Meeks; Jeff Michalski; Jeffrey S Montgomery; Lance C Pagliaro; Sumanta K Pal; Anthony Patterson; Daniel Petrylak; Elizabeth R Plimack; Kamal S Pohar; Michael P Porter; Wade J Sexton; Arlene O Siefker-Radtke; Guru Sonpavde; Jonathan Tward; Geoffrey Wile; Mary A Dwyer; Courtney Smith
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 8.  [Systemic treatment of bladder cancer].

Authors:  M Haas; M Burger; M J Schnabel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 9.  Urothelial carcinoma: stem cells on the edge.

Authors:  William D Brandt; William Matsui; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Xiaobing He; Shizhang Ling; Edward M Schaeffer; David M Berman
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 9.264

10.  Personalized medicine in advanced urothelial cancer: when to treat, how to treat and who to treat.

Authors:  Behfar Ehdaie; Steven C Smith; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.