Literature DB >> 20160033

The COXEN principle: translating signatures of in vitro chemosensitivity into tools for clinical outcome prediction and drug discovery in cancer.

Steven C Smith1, Alexander S Baras, Jae K Lee, Dan Theodorescu.   

Abstract

Substantial effort has been devoted to in vitro testing of candidate chemotherapeutic agents. In particular, the United States National Cancer Institute Developmental Therapeutics Program (NCI-DTP) Human Tumor Cell Line Screen has screened hundreds of thousands of compounds and extracts, for which data on more than 40,000 compounds tested on a panel of 60 cancer cell lines (NCI-60) are publically available. In tandem, gene expression profiling has brought about a sea change in our understanding of cancer biology, allowing discovery of biomarkers or signatures able to characterize, classify, and prognosticate clinical behavior of human tumors. Recent studies have used tumor profiling matched to clinical trial outcome data to derive gene expression models predicting therapeutic outcomes, though such efforts are costly, time-consuming, tumor type-specific, and not amenable to rare diseases. Furthermore, addition of new or established drugs to multidrug combinations in which such models are already available requires the entire model to be re-derived. Can the aforementioned in vitro testing platform, coupled to the universal language of genomics, be used to develop, a priori, gene expression models predictive of clinical outcomes? Recent advances, including the CO-eXpression ExtrapolatioN (COXEN) algorithm, suggest that development of these models may be possible and raise important implications for future trial design and drug discovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20160033      PMCID: PMC2831138          DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  25 in total

1.  Predicting response to methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy for bladder cancers through genome-wide gene expression profiling.

Authors:  Ryo Takata; Toyomasa Katagiri; Mitsugu Kanehira; Tatsuhiko Tsunoda; Taro Shuin; Tsuneharu Miki; Mikio Namiki; Kenjiro Kohri; Yasushi Matsushita; Tomoaki Fujioka; Yusuke Nakamura
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Cetuximab, chemotherapy and KRAS status in mCRC.

Authors:  Sharlene Gill; Richard M Goldberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura J van 't Veer; Hongyue Dai; Marc J van de Vijver; Yudong D He; Augustinus A M Hart; Mao Mao; Hans L Peterse; Karin van der Kooy; Matthew J Marton; Anke T Witteveen; George J Schreiber; Ron M Kerkhoven; Chris Roberts; Peter S Linsley; René Bernards; Stephen H Friend
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Gemcitabine and cisplatin versus methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in advanced or metastatic bladder cancer: results of a large, randomized, multinational, multicenter, phase III study.

Authors:  H von der Maase; S W Hansen; J T Roberts; L Dogliotti; T Oliver; M J Moore; I Bodrogi; P Albers; A Knuth; C M Lippert; P Kerbrat; P Sanchez Rovira; P Wersall; S P Cleall; D F Roychowdhury; I Tomlin; C M Visseren-Grul; P F Conte
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Comparison of global versus epidermal growth factor receptor pathway profiling for prediction of lapatinib sensitivity in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Dmytro M Havaleshko; Steven Christopher Smith; HyungJun Cho; Sooyoung Cheon; Charles R Owens; Jae K Lee; Lance A Liotta; Virginia Espina; Julia D Wulfkuhle; Emanuel F Petricoin; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.715

6.  Concordant gene expression signatures predict clinical outcomes of cancer patients undergoing systemic therapy.

Authors:  Paul D Williams; Sooyoung Cheon; Dmytro M Havaleshko; Hyeon Jeong; Feng Cheng; Dan Theodorescu; Jae K Lee
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 7.  Activating and resistance mutations of EGFR in non-small-cell lung cancer: role in clinical response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Authors:  A F Gazdar
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 8.  Diagnostic and therapeutic management of cancer of an unknown primary.

Authors:  N Pavlidis; E Briasoulis; J Hainsworth; F A Greco
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 9.  Parallel progression of primary tumours and metastases.

Authors:  Christoph A Klein
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 60.716

10.  Evaluation of the safety of C-1311 (SYMADEX) administered in a phase 1 dose escalation trial as a weekly infusion for 3 consecutive weeks in patients with advanced solid tumours.

Authors:  N Isambert; M Campone; E Bourbouloux; M Drouin; A Major; W Yin; P Loadman; R Capizzi; C Grieshaber; P Fumoleau
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 9.162

View more
  43 in total

1.  Perspectives on personalized cancer care.

Authors:  Garrett M Dancika; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 2.  Neoadjuvant paradigm for accelerated drug development: an ideal model in bladder cancer.

Authors:  David D Chism; Michael E Woods; Matthew I Milowsky
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-07-24

3.  Words of wisdom. Re: Phase III study of molecularly targeted adjuvant therapy in locally advanced urothelial cancer of the bladder based on p53 status.

Authors:  Thomas W Flaig; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 4.  Molecular Characterization of Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Thenappan Chandrasekar; Annette Erlich; Alexandre R Zlotta
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Elevating the Horizon: Emerging Molecular and Genomic Targets in the Treatment of Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Metin Kurtoglu; Nicole N Davarpanah; Rui Qin; Thomas Powles; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Andrea B Apolo
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 2.872

6.  p63 expression correlates with sensitivity to the Eg5 inhibitor ZD4877 in bladder cancer cells.

Authors:  Lauren Marquis; Mai Tran; Woonyoung Choi; I-Ling Lee; Dennis Huszar; Arlene Siefker-Radtke; Colin Dinney; David J McConkey
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 7.  Prognostic Genetic Signatures in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Qiang Li; Aditya Bagrodia; Eugene K Cha; Jonathan A Coleman
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 8.  The Rho GTPase signalling pathway in urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Solomon L Woldu; Ryan C Hutchinson; Laura-Maria Krabbe; Oner Sanli; Vitaly Margulis
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 14.432

9.  Bladder cancer: bladder preservation--learning what we don't know.

Authors:  Maha Hussain; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 10.  The role of tumour-stromal interactions in modifying drug response: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Douglas W McMillin; Joseph M Negri; Constantine S Mitsiades
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 84.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.