Literature DB >> 33563627

Formative peer assessment in higher healthcare education programmes: a scoping review.

Marie Stenberg1, Elisabeth Mangrio1, Mariette Bengtsson1, Elisabeth Carlson2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Formative peer assessment focuses on learning and development of the student learning process. This implies that students are taking responsibility for assessing the work of their peers by giving and receiving feedback to each other. The aim was to compile research about formative peer assessment presented in higher healthcare education, focusing on the rationale, the interventions, the experiences of students and teachers and the outcomes of formative assessment interventions.
DESIGN: A scoping review. DATA SOURCES: Searches were conducted until May 2019 in PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Education Research Complete and Education Research Centre. Grey literature was searched in Library Search, Google Scholar and Science Direct. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies addressing formative peer assessment in higher education, focusing on medicine, nursing, midwifery, dentistry, physical or occupational therapy and radiology published in peer-reviewed articles or in grey literature. DATA EXTRACTIONS AND SYNTHESIS: Out of 1452 studies, 37 met the inclusion criteria and were critically appraised using relevant Critical Appraisal Skills Programme, Joanna Briggs Institute and Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool tools. The pertinent data were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULT: The critical appraisal resulted in 18 included studies with high and moderate quality. The rationale for using formative peer assessment relates to giving and receiving constructive feedback as a means to promote learning. The experience and outcome of formative peer assessment interventions from the perspective of students and teachers are presented within three themes: (1) organisation and structure of the formative peer assessment activities, (2) personal attributes and consequences for oneself and relationships and (3) experience and outcome of feedback and learning.
CONCLUSION: Healthcare education must consider preparing and introducing students to collaborative learning, and thus develop well-designed learning activities aligned with the learning outcomes. Since peer collaboration seems to affect students' and teachers' experiences of formative peer assessment, empirical investigations exploring collaboration between students are of utmost importance. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  education & training (see medical education & training); medical education & training; quality in health care

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33563627      PMCID: PMC7875268          DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


  42 in total

1.  Communication skills assessment: the perceptions of medical students at the University of Nottingham.

Authors:  Charlotte Rees; Charlotte Sheard; Amy McPherson
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.251

2.  An analysis of peer, self, and tutor assessment in problem-based learning tutorials.

Authors:  Tracey Papinczak; Louise Young; Michele Groves; Michele Haynes
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.650

3.  Formative assessment can be fun as well as educational.

Authors:  J N Hudson; D R Bristow
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.288

4.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Academic staff perspectives of formative assessment in nurse education.

Authors:  Lai Chan Koh
Journal:  Nurse Educ Pract       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 2.281

6.  Peer feedback as an aid to learning--what do we want? Feedback. When do we want it? Now!

Authors:  Annie Cushing; Stephen Abbott; Doug Lothian; Angela Hall; Olwyn M R Westwood
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.650

7.  Nursing as universal and recognisable: Nursing students'perceptions of learning outcomes from intercultural peer learning webinars: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Elisabeth Carlson; Marie Stenberg; Bessie Chan; Sukki Ho; Timothy Lai; Arkers Wong; Engle Angela Chan
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 3.442

Review 8.  Peer assessment in the objective structured clinical examination: A scoping review.

Authors:  Rishad Khan; Michael W C Payne; Saad Chahine
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 3.650

9.  Formative peer assessment in healthcare education programmes: protocol for a scoping review.

Authors:  Marie Stenberg; Elisabeth Mangrio; Mariette Bengtsson; Elisabeth Carlson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  1 in total

1.  Innovative Tele-Instruction Approach Impacts Basic Life Support Performance: A Non-inferiority Trial.

Authors:  Michael Tobias Schauwinhold; Michelle Schmidt; Jenny W Rudolph; Martin Klasen; Sophie Isabelle Lambert; Alexander Krusch; Lina Vogt; Saša Sopka
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-05-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.