Literature DB >> 33562102

Ultrashort Implants, Alternative Prosthetic Rehabilitation in Mandibular Atrophies in Fragile Subjects: A Retrospective Study.

Giovanni Falisi1, Carlo Di Paolo2, Claudio Rastelli1, Carlo Franceschini2, Sofia Rastelli1, Roberto Gatto1, Gianluca Botticelli1.   

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of using ultrashort implants in the rehabilitation of jaws of fragile patients. The aim of the study was to retrospectively evaluate the survival rate of full-arch prosthetic rehabilitation on ultrashort implants, length 4 mm, 4 mm in diameter in the premolar and canine area and 4.5 mm in diameter in the molar area, with the insertion torque of 60 Nw and immediate loading. Nineteen patients were evaluated for 3 years clinically and radiographically. The significant majority of the patients at the 3 year follow-up (T4) presented a stable and functional implant-supported prothesis, and the survival rate of the implants was 85%, with a loss of 16 implants on 114 implants. The combination of the innovative implant surfaces and the correct project of the prostheses, with the related implant connection, determined a different timing in the therapy, allowing to obtain an immediate loading, which is currently demanded by patients. This and recent reports on short and ultrashort implant usage in atrophic jaws offer a good solution in critical cases. In conclusion, within the limits of the study, the full-arch rehabilitation with immediate loading on ultrashort implants showed good results with few postoperative complications and related low biological cost.

Entities:  

Keywords:  full-arch rehabilitation; immediate loading; neutral zone; ultrashort implants

Year:  2021        PMID: 33562102      PMCID: PMC7914866          DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9020175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)        ISSN: 2227-9032


  27 in total

Review 1.  Immediate loading: from biology to biomechanics. Report of the Committee on Research in fixed Prosthodontics of the American Academy of fixed Prosthodontics.

Authors:  Peter Barndt; Hai Zhang; Fei Liu
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 3.426

2.  Use of short implants (6 mm) in a single-tooth replacement: a 5-year follow-up prospective randomized controlled multicenter clinical study.

Authors:  Fabio Rossi; Daniele Botticelli; Gianfranco Cesaretti; Enzo De Santis; Stefano Storelli; Niklaus P Lang
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 5.977

3.  Short (5 and 7 mm long) porous implants in the posterior atrophic maxilla: a 5-year report of a prospective single-cohort study.

Authors:  Michele Perelli; Roberto Abundo; Giuseppe Corrente; Carlo Saccone
Journal:  Eur J Oral Implantol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.123

Review 4.  Survival rates of short (6 mm) micro-rough surface implants: a review of literature and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Murali Srinivasan; Lydia Vazquez; Philippe Rieder; Osvaldo Moraguez; Jean-Pierre Bernard; Urs C Belser
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 5.977

5.  Evaluation of Different Heights of Prosthetic Crowns Supported by an Ultra-Short Implant Using Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Douglas Máximo Elias; Claudia Scigliano Valerio; Dauro Douglas de Oliveira; Flávio Ricardo Manzi; Elton Gonçalves Zenóbio; Paulo Isaías Seraidarian
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2020 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 1.681

6.  Soft tissue augmentation by means of silicon expanders prior to bone volume increase: a case series.

Authors:  A Scarano; S Bernardi; C Rastelli; C Mortellaro; P Vittorini; G Falisi
Journal:  J Biol Regul Homeost Agents       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.711

7.  Posterior jaws rehabilitated with partial prostheses supported by 4.0 x 4.0 mm or by longer implants: Four-month post-loading data from a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Marco Esposito; Carlo Barausse; Roberto Pistilli; Vittorio Checchi; Michele Diazzi; Maria Rosaria Gatto; Pietro Felice
Journal:  Eur J Oral Implantol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.123

8.  Group 1 ITI Consensus Report: The influence of implant length and design and medications on clinical and patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Ronald E Jung; Bilal Al-Nawas; Mauricio Araujo; Gustavo Avila-Ortiz; Stephen Barter; Nadine Brodala; Vivianne Chappuis; Bo Chen; Andre De Souza; Ricardo Faria Almeida; Stefan Fickl; Gary Finelle; Jeffrey Ganeles; Hadi Gholami; Christoph Hammerle; Simon Jensen; Asbjørn Jokstad; Hideaki Katsuyama; Johannes Kleinheinz; Chatchai Kunavisarut; Nikos Mardas; Alberto Monje; Panos Papaspyridakos; Michael Payer; Eik Schiegnitz; Ralf Smeets; Martina Stefanini; Christiaan Ten Bruggenkate; Konstantinos Vazouras; Hans-Peter Weber; Dieter Weingart; Péter Windisch
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.977

9.  4 mm long vs longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic jaws: 1-year post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Caroline Bolle; Pietro Felice; Carlo Barausse; Valeria Pistilli; Anna Trullenque-Eriksson; Marco Esposito
Journal:  Eur J Oral Implantol       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 3.123

10.  Neutral zone recording in computer-guided implant prosthesis: A new digital neuromuscular approach.

Authors:  Massimo Frascaria; Davide Pietropaoli; Matteo Casinelli; Ruggero Cattaneo; Eleonora Ortu; Annalisa Monaco
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2019-08-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.