Literature DB >> 26355167

Posterior jaws rehabilitated with partial prostheses supported by 4.0 x 4.0 mm or by longer implants: Four-month post-loading data from a randomised controlled trial.

Marco Esposito, Carlo Barausse, Roberto Pistilli, Vittorio Checchi, Michele Diazzi, Maria Rosaria Gatto, Pietro Felice.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether 4.0 x 4.0 mm dental implants could be an alternative to implants at least 8.5 mm long, which were placed in posterior jaws in the presence of adequate bone volumes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and fifty patients with posterior (premolar and molar areas) mandibles having at least 12.5 mm bone height above the mandibular canal or 11.5 mm bone height below the maxillary sinus, were randomised according to a parallel group design, in order to receive one to three 4.0 mm-long implants or one to three implants which were at least 8.5 mm long, at three centres. All implants had a diameter of 4.0 mm. Implants were loaded after 4 months with definitive screw-retained prostheses. Patients were followed up to 4-month post-loading and outcome measures were prosthesis and implant failures, any complications and peri-implant marginal bone level changes.
RESULTS: No patients dropped-out before the 4-month evaluation. Three patients experienced the early failures of one 4.0 mm-long implant each, in comparison to two patients who lost one long implant each (difference in proportion = 0.01; 95% CI -0.06 to 0.09; P = 0.50). Consequently, two prostheses in each group could not be delivered as planned (difference in proportion = 0; 95% CI -0.07 to 0.07; P = 0.69), and one patient from each group is still waiting to have their prostheses delivered. Three short implant patients experienced three complications versus two long implant patients (difference in proportion = 0.01; 95% CI -0.06 to 0.09; P = 0.50). There were no statistically significant differences in prosthesis failures, implant failures and complications. Patients with short implants lost on average 0.38 mm of peri-implant bone at 4 months and patients with long mandibular implants lost 0.42 mm. There were no statistically significant differences in bone level changes up to 4 months between short and long implants (mean difference = 0.04 mm; 95% CI: -0.041 to 0.117; P = 0.274).
CONCLUSIONS: Four months after loading, 4.0 x 4.0 mm implants achieved similar results as 8.5 x 4.0 mm-long or longer implants in posterior jaws, however 5 to 10 years post-loading data are necessary before reliable recommendations can be made.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26355167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 1756-2406            Impact factor:   3.123


  6 in total

Review 1.  Short versus Longer Implants in Sites without the Need for Bone Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Luigi Guida; Eriberto Bressan; Gennaro Cecoro; Armando Davide Volpe; Massimo Del Fabbro; Marco Annunziata
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 3.748

2.  Ultrashort Implants, Alternative Prosthetic Rehabilitation in Mandibular Atrophies in Fragile Subjects: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Giovanni Falisi; Carlo Di Paolo; Claudio Rastelli; Carlo Franceschini; Sofia Rastelli; Roberto Gatto; Gianluca Botticelli
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-06

3.  Survival rates of ultra-short (<6 mm) compared with short locking-taper implants supporting single crowns in posterior areas: A 5-year retrospective study.

Authors:  Giorgio Lombardo; Annarita Signoriello; Mauro Marincola; Pietro Liboni; Estevam A Bonfante; Pier F Nocini
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 4.259

4.  Dynamic Navigated "Sandwich" Technique: A Novel Surgical Approach for Safe Osteotomies in the Rehabilitation of an Atrophic Posterior Mandible: A Case Report.

Authors:  Pietro Felice; Lorenzo Bonifazi; Maryia Karaban; Cesare Berti; Gerardo Pellegrino; Carlo Barausse
Journal:  Methods Protoc       Date:  2021-05-16

Review 5.  Clinical Comparation of Extra-Short (4 mm) and Long (>8 mm) Dental Implants Placed in Mandibular Bone: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis.

Authors:  Vittorio Moraschini; Carlos Fernando de Almeida Barros Mourão; Pietro Montemezzi; Ingrid Chaves Cavalcante Kischinhevsky; Daniel Costa Ferreira de Almeida; Kayvon Javid; Jamil Awad Shibli; José Mauro Granjeiro; Monica Diuana Calasans-Maia
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-12

6.  Mandible Biomechanics and Continuously Erupting Teeth: A New Defect Model for Studying Load-Bearing Biomaterials.

Authors:  Jonathan Z Baskin; Brandon M White; Amit Vasanji; Thomas E Love; Steven J Eppell
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2021-06-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.