Literature DB >> 23000710

Short (5 and 7 mm long) porous implants in the posterior atrophic maxilla: a 5-year report of a prospective single-cohort study.

Michele Perelli1, Roberto Abundo, Giuseppe Corrente, Carlo Saccone.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this ongoing prospective study was to determine the 5-year survival rate of short porous dental implants in the posterior atrophic maxilla combined, when necessary, with crestal sinus floor elevation and often adding anorganic bovine bone.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 87 partially edentulous patients, 110 short porous implants were placed and followed up for 5 years. The implants used were of two lengths (5 and 7 mm) and two diameters (4.1 and 5 mm) and were chosen according to the available crestal height and width. In 47 sites, osteotome sinus floor elevation was performed (in 8 cases compacting basal bone, in 39 adding a xenograft). The unloaded healing period was 6 months. A total of 63 implants were restored with single crowns and 47 were splinted to the adjacent implants. Outcome measures were prosthesis and implant failures, any complications, and peri-implant marginal bone resorption.
RESULTS: Five years after loading, no patients dropped out. Eleven implants failed: 2 implants at uncovering and 9 after prosthetic loading. Eleven patients (12.6%) lost 1 implant. In 6 patients (6.9%) a prosthesis failure occurred (implants loaded with single crowns). One surgical complication (membrane perforation) occurred but the implant was normally inserted. No complications occurred during the healing period. In 3 patients, severe peri-implantitis occurred post loading and the implants had to be removed. Two abutments became loose and one crown chipped. At the end of the follow-up period the implant survival rate was 90%, and 93.1% with regard to prosthetic reconstruction. The mean peri-implant marginal bone loss was 1.4 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of short porous implants showed an acceptable clinical outcome in the treatment of the posterior maxilla in this interim 5-year report. Longer follow-ups are needed to confirm these results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23000710

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 1756-2406            Impact factor:   3.123


  10 in total

1.  Posterior partially edentulous jaws, planning a rehabilitation with dental implants.

Authors:  Douglas R Monteiro; Emily V F Silva; Eduardo P Pellizzer; Osvaldo Magro Filho; Marcelo C Goiato
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 1.337

2.  Transcrestal guided sinus lift without grafting materials: a 36 months clinical prospective study.

Authors:  D Spinelli; G DE Vico; R Condò; L Ottria; C Arcuri
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2016-07-25

Review 3.  The survival rate of transcrestal sinus floor elevation combined with short implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Zhe-Zhen Lin; Yan-Qing Jiao; Zhang-Yan Ye; Ge-Ge Wang; Xi Ding
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-05-20

4.  Sinus Floor Elevation with Modified Crestal Approach and Single Loaded Short Implants: A Case Report with 4 Years of Follow-Up.

Authors:  Michele Perelli; Roberto Abundo; Giuseppe Corrente; Carlo Saccone; Paolo G Arduino
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2017-12-18

5.  Ultrashort Implants, Alternative Prosthetic Rehabilitation in Mandibular Atrophies in Fragile Subjects: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Giovanni Falisi; Carlo Di Paolo; Claudio Rastelli; Carlo Franceschini; Sofia Rastelli; Roberto Gatto; Gianluca Botticelli
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-06

Review 6.  Simultaneous placement of short implants (≤ 8 mm) versus standard length implants (≥ 10 mm) after sinus floor elevation in atrophic posterior maxillae: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chenxi Tang; Qianhui Du; Jiaying Luo; Lin Peng
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-10-05

7.  Clinical evaluation of short 6-mm implants alone, short 8-mm implants combined with osteotome sinus floor elevation and standard 10-mm implants combined with osteotome sinus floor elevation in posterior maxillae: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jun-Yu Shi; Ying-Xin Gu; Shi-Chong Qiao; Long-Fei Zhuang; Xiao-Meng Zhang; Hong-Chang Lai
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Inlay osteotome sinus floor elevation with concentrated growth factor application and simultaneous short implant placement in severely atrophic maxilla.

Authors:  Yonghui Chen; Zhiyu Cai; Dingguo Zheng; Pei Lin; Yahua Cai; Shuxin Hong; Yiwei Lai; Dong Wu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Short Dental Implants (≤7mm) Versus Longer Implants in Augmented Bone Area: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Priscila N Uehara; Victor Haruo Matsubara; Fernando Igai; Newton Sesma; Marcio K Mukai; Mauricio G Araujo
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2018-04-30

10.  CT-based dentulous mandibular alveolar ridge measurements as predictors of crown-to-implant ratio for short and extra short dental implants.

Authors:  Francesco Cavallin; Stefano Sivolella; Silvia Meggiorin; Nadia Ferrarese; Amalia Lupi; Antonino Fiorino; Chiara Giraudo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.