Literature DB >> 33561127

Toward on-the-fly trajectory optimization for C-arm CBCT under strong kinematic constraints.

Sepideh Hatamikia1,2, Ander Biguri3, Gernot Kronreif1, Michael Figl2, Tom Russ4, Joachim Kettenbach5, Martin Buschmann6, Wolfgang Birkfellner2.   

Abstract

Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) has become a vital tool in interventional radiology. Usually, a circular source-detector trajectory is used to acquire a three-dimensional (3D) image. Kinematic constraints due to the patient size or additional medical equipment often cause collisions with the imager while performing a full circular rotation. In a previous study, we developed a framework to design collision-free, patient-specific trajectories for the cases in which circular CBCT is not feasible. Our proposed trajectories included enough information to appropriately reconstruct a particular volume of interest (VOI), but the constraints had to be defined before the intervention. As most collisions are unpredictable, performing an on-the-fly trajectory optimization is desirable. In this study, we propose a search strategy that explores a set of trajectories that cover the whole collision-free area and subsequently performs a search locally in the areas with the highest image quality. Selecting the best trajectories is performed using simulations on a prior diagnostic CT volume which serves as a digital phantom for simulations. In our simulations, the Feature SIMilarity Index (FSIM) is used as the objective function to evaluate the imaging quality provided by different trajectories. We investigated the performance of our methods using three different anatomical targets inside the Alderson-Rando phantom. We used FSIM and Universal Quality Image (UQI) to evaluate the final reconstruction results. Our experiments showed that our proposed trajectories could achieve a comparable image quality in the VOI compared to the standard C-arm circular CBCT. We achieved a relative deviation less than 10% for both FSIM and UQI metrics between the reconstructed images from the optimized trajectories and the standard C-arm CBCT for all three targets. The whole trajectory optimization took approximately three to four minutes.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33561127      PMCID: PMC7872257          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  17 in total

1.  Three-dimensional imaging and cone beam volume CT in C-arm angiography with flat panel detector.

Authors:  Sergin Akpek; Thomas Brunner; Goetz Benndorf; Charles Strother
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.630

2.  Collision-avoiding imaging trajectories for linac mounted cone-beam CT.

Authors:  Andrew M Davis; Erik A Pearson; Xiaochuan Pan; Charles A Pelizzari; Hania Al-Hallaq
Journal:  J Xray Sci Technol       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 1.535

Review 3.  C-arm cone-beam CT: general principles and technical considerations for use in interventional radiology.

Authors:  Robert C Orth; Michael J Wallace; Michael D Kuo
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 4.  Robotic systems for percutaneous needle-guided interventions.

Authors:  Joachim Kettenbach; Gernot Kronreif
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.442

5.  Task-driven source-detector trajectories in cone-beam computed tomography: I. Theory and methods.

Authors:  J Webster Stayman; Sarah Capostagno; Grace J Gang; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-05-02

Review 6.  C-arm cone-beam computed tomography in interventional oncology: technical aspects and clinical applications.

Authors:  Chiara Floridi; Alessandro Radaelli; Nadine Abi-Jaoudeh; Michael Grass; Micheal Grass; MingDe Lin; Ming De Lin; Melanie Chiaradia; Jean-Francois Geschwind; Hicham Kobeiter; Hishman Kobeiter; Ettore Squillaci; Geert Maleux; Andrea Giovagnoni; Luca Brunese; Bradford Wood; Gianpaolo Carrafiello; Antonio Rotondo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  Non-circular CT orbit design for elimination of metal artifacts.

Authors:  Grace J Gang; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen; J Webster Stayman
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2020-03-16

8.  Cone beam CT imaging with limited angle of projections and prior knowledge for volumetric verification of non-coplanar beam radiation therapy: a proof of concept study.

Authors:  Bowen Meng; Lei Xing; Bin Han; Albert Koong; Daniel Chang; Jason Cheng; Ruijiang Li
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Optimization for customized trajectories in cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Sepideh Hatamikia; Ander Biguri; Gernot Kronreif; Joachim Kettenbach; Tom Russ; Hugo Furtado; Lalith Kumar Shiyam Sundar; Martin Buschmann; Ewald Unger; Michael Figl; Dietmar Georg; Wolfgang Birkfellner
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  A learning-based method for online adjustment of C-arm Cone-beam CT source trajectories for artifact avoidance.

Authors:  Mareike Thies; Jan-Nico Zäch; Cong Gao; Russell Taylor; Nassir Navab; Andreas Maier; Mathias Unberath
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 2.924

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.