Literature DB >> 33557188

Disclosure in Online vs. Face-to-Face Occupational Health Screenings: A Cross-Sectional Study in Belgian Hospital Employees.

Jonas Stefaan Steel1, Lode Godderis2,3, Jeroen Luyten1.   

Abstract

Replacing or supplementing face-to-face health screening by occupational physicians with online surveys can be attractive for various reasons. However, the (cost-)effectiveness of both depends on employees' willingness to disclose occupational health problems. This article investigates whether employees show a different willingness to disclose information in online surveys compared to face-to-face consultations with an occupational physician. Employees from four Flemish hospitals were asked whether they would disclose a range of typical occupational health problems to either surveys or physicians. The results were analyzed through chi-square tests and multilevel ordinary least squares regression. Of the 776 respondents, 26% indicated that they did not always disclose health problems. Respondents were more inclined to disclose mental health problems to a survey than face-to-face to a physician, whereas the opposite was true for medication misuse. Being male, younger, with lower educational attainment or lower trust in physicians, taking medication, or having a lower risk on alcohol abuse increased the likelihood of a person withholding information. We conclude that this study provides indications that online vs. face-to-face health check-ups have different strengths and weaknesses in this respect. These must be considered when evaluating the need to use online surveys (instead of, or together with, face-to-face contacts) for health screening.

Entities:  

Keywords:  deception; disclosure; health screening; honest reporting; occupational physician; survey

Year:  2021        PMID: 33557188      PMCID: PMC7913988          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18041460

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  24 in total

1.  Relational mobility explains between- and within-culture differences in self-disclosure to close friends.

Authors:  Joanna Schug; Masaki Yuki; William Maddux
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-09-03

2.  Psychometric properties of the Need for Recovery after work scale: test-retest reliability and sensitivity to detect change.

Authors:  E M de Croon; J K Sluiter; M H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Lies in the doctor-patient relationship.

Authors:  John J Palmieri; Theodore A Stern
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2009

Review 4.  Disclosure of sensitive behaviors across self-administered survey modes: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Timo Gnambs; Kai Kaspar
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2015-12

5.  Beware the lies of patients.

Authors:  Daniel K Sokol
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-01-22

6.  Patient satisfaction with occupational health physicians, development of a questionnaire.

Authors:  J H Verbeek; A G de Boer; W E van der Weide; H Piirainen; J R Anema; R J van Amstel; F Hartog
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.402

7.  The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): an effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Project (ACQUIP). Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test.

Authors:  K Bush; D R Kivlahan; M B McDonell; S D Fihn; K A Bradley
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1998-09-14

8.  Physicians being deceived.

Authors:  Beth Jung; Marcus M Reidenberg
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.750

9.  Nordic Occupational Skin Questionnaire (NOSQ-2002): a new tool for surveying occupational skin diseases and exposure.

Authors:  P Susitaival; M-A Flyvholm; B Meding; L Kanerva; M Lindberg; A Svensson; J H Olafsson
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.600

10.  Workers' health surveillance: implementation of the Directive 89/391/EEC in Europe.

Authors:  C Colosio; S Mandic-Rajcevic; L Godderis; G van der Laan; C Hulshof; F van Dijk
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 1.611

View more
  1 in total

1.  Short-term effectiveness of face-to-face periodic occupational health screening versus electronic screening with targeted follow-up: results from a quasi-randomized controlled trial in four Belgian hospitals.

Authors:  Jonas Stefaan Steel; Lode Godderis; Jeroen Luyten
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 5.492

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.