AIMS: To develop a questionnaire that measures specific aspects of patient satisfaction with occupational health physicians. METHODS: General patient satisfaction questionnaires, a literature survey, and interviews with patients were used. An initial questionnaire was distributed among sick listed patients (n = 432) of occupational physicians (n = 90) from different occupational health services. To reduce items and to develop scales exploratory factor analysis and reliability analysis was used. A linear regression model was used to predict satisfaction ratings from the scales of the questionnaire. RESULTS: Questions about independence of the occupational physician were difficult to ask unambiguously. The factor analysis revealed five relevant factors which were named "being taken seriously as a patient", "attitude towards occupational health services", "trust and confidentiality", "expectations", and "comfort and access". All scales could be reduced to a maximum of five items without reducing the scale reliability too much. In the regression analysis, 71% of the variance of satisfaction ratings was explained by the first four scales and most by the first scale. "Comfort and access" did not contribute significantly to the model. CONCLUSIONS: A short questionnaire was developed to measure different aspects of patient satisfaction specific for occupational health. Whether the questionnaire can effectively lead to quality improvement in occupational health services should be investigated.
AIMS: To develop a questionnaire that measures specific aspects of patient satisfaction with occupational health physicians. METHODS: General patient satisfaction questionnaires, a literature survey, and interviews with patients were used. An initial questionnaire was distributed among sick listed patients (n = 432) of occupational physicians (n = 90) from different occupational health services. To reduce items and to develop scales exploratory factor analysis and reliability analysis was used. A linear regression model was used to predict satisfaction ratings from the scales of the questionnaire. RESULTS: Questions about independence of the occupational physician were difficult to ask unambiguously. The factor analysis revealed five relevant factors which were named "being taken seriously as a patient", "attitude towards occupational health services", "trust and confidentiality", "expectations", and "comfort and access". All scales could be reduced to a maximum of five items without reducing the scale reliability too much. In the regression analysis, 71% of the variance of satisfaction ratings was explained by the first four scales and most by the first scale. "Comfort and access" did not contribute significantly to the model. CONCLUSIONS: A short questionnaire was developed to measure different aspects of patient satisfaction specific for occupational health. Whether the questionnaire can effectively lead to quality improvement in occupational health services should be investigated.
Authors: D R Veroff; P M Gallagher; V Wilson; M Uyeda; J Merselis; E Guadagnoli; S Edgman-Levitan; A Zaslavsky; S Kleimann; P D Cleary Journal: Int J Qual Health Care Date: 1998-12 Impact factor: 2.038
Authors: Sylvia J Vermeulen; Johannes R Anema; Antonius J M Schellart; Willem van Mechelen; Allard J van der Beek Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2010-03-28 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Marlou L A de Kroon; Jozien Bulthuis; Wico Mulder; Frederieke G Schaafsma; Johannes R Anema Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2016-06-18 Impact factor: 3.380
Authors: Lisanne M Verweij; Karin I Proper; Andre N H Weel; Carel T J Hulshof; Willem van Mechelen Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2009-12-14 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Ludeke C Lambeek; Willem van Mechelen; Peter C Buijs; Patrick Loisel; Johannes R Anema Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2009-11-30 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: H Jolanda van Rijssen; Antonius J M Schellart; Johannes R Anema; Allard J van der Beek Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2009-10-06 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Robin F van Gils; Pieter G M van der Valk; Derk Bruynzeel; Pieter J Coenraads; Cécile R L Boot; Willem van Mechelen; Johannes R Anema Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2009-12-01 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Karlijn M van Beurden; Evelien P M Brouwers; Margot C W Joosen; Berend Terluin; Jac J L van der Klink; Jaap van Weeghel Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-03-06 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Daniëlle Volker; Moniek C Vlasveld; Johannes R Anema; Aartjan Tf Beekman; Leona Hakkaart-van Roijen; Evelien Pm Brouwers; A Gijsbert C van Lomwel; Christina M van der Feltz-Cornelis Journal: Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Date: 2013-04-22 Impact factor: 2.570