Literature DB >> 20817913

Relational mobility explains between- and within-culture differences in self-disclosure to close friends.

Joanna Schug1, Masaki Yuki, William Maddux.   

Abstract

In the current research, we tested a novel explanation for previously demonstrated findings that East Asians disclose less personal information to other people than do Westerners. We propose that both between- and within-culture differences in self-disclosure to close friends may be explained by the construct of relational mobility, the general degree to which individuals in a society have opportunities to form new relationships and terminate old ones. In Study 1, we found that cross-cultural differences (Japan vs. United States) in self-disclosure to a close friend were mediated by individuals' perceptions of relational mobility. In Study 2, two separate measures of relational mobility predicted self-disclosure within a single culture (Japan), and this relationship was mediated by the motivation to engage in self-disclosure to strengthen personal relationships. We conclude that societies and social contexts higher in relational mobility (in which relationships can be formed and dissolved relatively easily) produce stronger incentives for self-disclosure as a social-commitment device.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20817913     DOI: 10.1177/0956797610382786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  20 in total

1.  The cultural contagion of conflict.

Authors:  Michele Gelfand; Garriy Shteynberg; Tiane Lee; Janetta Lun; Sarah Lyons; Chris Bell; Joan Y Chiao; C Bayan Bruss; May Al Dabbagh; Zeynep Aycan; Abdel-Hamid Abdel-Latif; Munqith Dagher; Hilal Khashan; Nazar Soomro
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  High strength-of-ties and low mobility enable the evolution of third-party punishment.

Authors:  Patrick Roos; Michele Gelfand; Dana Nau; Ryan Carr
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Cross-cultural differences and similarities in proneness to shame: an adaptationist and ecological approach.

Authors:  Daniel Sznycer; Kosuke Takemura; Andrew W Delton; Kosuke Sato; Theresa Robertson; Leda Cosmides; John Tooby
Journal:  Evol Psychol       Date:  2012-06-29

Review 4.  Reputation and socio-ecology in humans.

Authors:  A Romano; F Giardini; S Columbus; E W de Kwaadsteniet; D Kisfalusi; Z Triki; C Snijders; K Hagel
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Talking about cancer: Explaining differences in social support among Chinese American and European American breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Becky Yang Hsu; Yulia Chentsova Dutton; Inez F Adams; Scarlett Lin Gomez; Laura Allen; Ellen Huang; Judy Huei-Yu Wang
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2017-12-15

6.  Does individualism bring happiness? Negative effects of individualism on interpersonal relationships and happiness.

Authors:  Yuji Ogihara; Yukiko Uchida
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-03-05

7.  Potential Regulatory Elements Between Attachment Styles and Psychopathology: Rejection Sensitivity and Self-esteem.

Authors:  Zeynep Set
Journal:  Noro Psikiyatr Ars       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 1.339

8.  The Influence of Socio-Ecological Networks on Willingness to Communicate in English for Japanese People.

Authors:  Takehiko Ito
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-07-09

9.  The Inevitability of Ethnocentrism Revisited: Ethnocentrism Diminishes As Mobility Increases.

Authors:  Soham De; Michele J Gelfand; Dana Nau; Patrick Roos
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Sensory motor mechanisms unify psychology: the embodiment of culture.

Authors:  Tamer Soliman; Alison Gibson; Arthur M Glenberg
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-11-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.