| Literature DB >> 33554169 |
Hao-Chun Chuang1, Chih-Kai Hong1, Kai-Lan Hsu1,2, Fa-Chuan Kuan1,2, Chen-Hao Chiang3, Yueh Chen4,5, Wei-Ren Su1,6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Degenerative signs on shoulder radiographs, including spur formation and narrow acromiohumeral intervals (AHIs), have been recognized as indicative of atrophic and fat-infiltrated rotator cuff muscles. Past studies have demonstrated that patients with poor quality muscles are prone to retraction of the supraspinatus tendon and failure to repair. However, the association between radiographic signs and tendon retraction has never been elucidated in previous literature. The present study aimed to investigate the association between the degenerative signs on shoulder radiographs and the severity of supraspinatus retraction.Entities:
Keywords: Rotator cuff tear; greater tuberosity spur; radiography; tendon retraction
Year: 2020 PMID: 33554169 PMCID: PMC7846697 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.09.015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JSES Int ISSN: 2666-6383
Figure 1Radiographic degenerative signs of the glenohumeral joint. (A) The presence of an acromial spur (broken line); (B) Acromial thickness (); (C) Acromiohumeral interval (); (D) Normal GT; (E) Sclerotic GT (); (F) Spurring GT (). GT, greater tuberosity.
Figure 2Retraction of supraspinatus tendon on MRI. (A) Patte stage 1, the stump is located near the insertion site at GT. (B) Patte stage 2, the stump is located at the humeral head. (C) Patte stage 3, the stump retracts to the level of the glenoid cavity. GT, greater tuberosity. The stump of torn supraspinatus tendon is indicated by an arrow (↑).
Characteristics of the study population
| Characteristic | Patte I | Patte II | Patte III | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 13 | 15 | 6 | .929 |
| Female | 12 | 16 | 5 | |
| Age | 56.2 ± 12.1 | 58.8 ± 5.9 | 63.9 ± 5.3 | .004 |
| Side | ||||
| Left | 8 | 4 | 4 | .142 |
| Right | 17 | 27 | 7 | |
| Acromial spur | ||||
| No | 23 | 20 | 5 | .008 |
| Yes | 2 | 11 | 6 | |
| Acromial thickness | 8.95 ± 1.5 | 8.65 ± 1.5 | 9.36 ± 1.9 | .495 |
| AHI | 8.7 ± 2.2 | 7.9 ± 2.2 | 7.0 ± 3.0 | .083 |
| GT morphology | ||||
| Normal | 13 | 5 | 0 | .003 |
| Sclerotic | 6 | 6 | 3 | |
| Spurring | 6 | 20 | 8 |
AHI, acromiohumeral interval; GT, greater tuberosity.
P value using chi-squared test or ordinal logistic regression.
Ordinal logistic regression analysis of predictive radiographic signs of Patte classification in patients with full thickness supraspinatus tears
| Predictor | Variable | B | SE | Wald chi-square | AOR | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GT morphology | Spurring | 2.155 | 0.7074 | 9.284 | .002 | 8.631 | 2.157-34.529 |
| Sclerotic | 1.330 | 0.7919 | 2.819 | .093 | 3.779 | 0.801-17.843 | |
| Normal | 0 | ||||||
| AHI | −0.238 | 0.1110 | 4.609 | .032 | 0.788 | 0.634-0.979 | |
| Acromial spur | Present | 1.060 | 0.5960 | 3.165 | .075 | 2.888 | 0.898-9.286 |
| Absent | 0 | ||||||
| Age | 0.053 | 0.0373 | 1.986 | .159 | 1.054 | 0.980-1.134 |
SE, standard error; P, P value; AOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Diagnostic performance of combinations of radiographic signs
| Combination | Sensitivity | Specificity | Youden’s index | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GT spur, acromial spur | 45.5% | 83.9% | 0.294 | 77.6% |
| GT spur, AHI ≤ 6 mm | 27.3% | 91.1% | 0.184 | 80.6% |
| Acromial spur, AHI ≤ 6 mm | 18.2% | 96.4% | 0.146 | 83.6% |
| GT spur, acromial spur, AHI ≤ 6 mm | 18.2% | 96.4% | 0.146 | 83.6% |
GT, greater tuberosity; AHI, acromiohumeral interval.