Literature DB >> 23401583

Imaging algorithms for evaluating suspected rotator cuff disease: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference statement.

Levon N Nazarian1, Jon A Jacobson, Carol B Benson, Laura W Bancroft, Asheesh Bedi, John M McShane, Theodore T Miller, Laurence Parker, Jay Smith, Lynne S Steinbach, Sharlene A Teefey, Ralf G Thiele, Michael J Tuite, James N Wise, Ken Yamaguchi.   

Abstract

The Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound convened a panel of specialists from a variety of medical disciplines to reach a consensus about the recommended imaging evaluation of painful shoulders with clinically suspected rotator cuff disease. The panel met in Chicago, Ill, on October 18 and 19, 2011, and created this consensus statement regarding the roles of radiography, ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT), CT arthrography, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and MR arthrography. The consensus panel consisted of two co-moderators, a facilitator, a statistician and health care economist, and 10 physicians who have specialty expertise in shoulder pain evaluation and/or treatment. Of the 13 physicians on the panel, nine were radiologists who were chosen to represent a broad range of skill sets in diagnostic imaging, different practice types (private and academic), and different geographical regions of the United States. Five of the radiologists routinely performed musculoskeletal US as part of their practice and four did not. There was also one representative from each of the following clinical specialties: rheumatology, physical medicine and rehabilitation, orthopedic surgery, and nonoperative sports medicine. The goal of this conference was to construct several algorithms with which to guide the imaging evaluation of suspected rotator cuff disease in patients with a native rotator cuff, patients with a repaired rotator cuff, and patients who have undergone shoulder replacement. The panel hopes that these recommendations will lead to greater uniformity in rotator cuff imaging and more cost-effective care for patients suspected of having rotator cuff abnormality. © RSNA, 2013.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23401583      PMCID: PMC3632808          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13121947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  46 in total

1.  Inter-rater agreement of the Goutallier, Patte, and Warner classification scores using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in patients with rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Julienne Lippe; Jeffrey T Spang; Robin R Leger; Robert A Arciero; Augustus D Mazzocca; Kevin P Shea
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Does extended-field-of-view sonography improve interrater reliability for the detection of rotator cuff muscle atrophy?

Authors:  Eoin C Kavanagh; George Koulouris; Laurence Parker; William B Morrison; Diane Bergin; Adam C Zoga; John A Dlugosz; Levon N Nazarian
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Accuracy of MRI, MR arthrography, and ultrasound in the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joseph O de Jesus; Laurence Parker; Andrea J Frangos; Levon N Nazarian
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 4.  Shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Florian M Buck; Bernhard Jost; Juerg Hodler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Multidetector spiral CT arthrography of the shoulder. Clinical applications and limits, with MR arthrography and arthroscopic correlations.

Authors:  Frédéric E Lecouvet; Paolo Simoni; Sophie Koutaïssoff; Bruno C Vande Berg; Jacques Malghem; Jean-Emile Dubuc
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Fatty infiltration of the supraspinatus: a reliability study.

Authors:  Matthew D Williams; Alexandre Lädermann; Barbara Melis; Renaud Barthelemy; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 7.  MRI of the rotator cuff and internal derangement.

Authors:  Oleg Opsha; Archana Malik; Romulo Baltazar; Denis Primakov; Salvador Beltran; Theodore T Miller; Javier Beltran
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  Relationship of tear size and location to fatty degeneration of the rotator cuff.

Authors:  H Mike Kim; Nirvikar Dahiya; Sharlene A Teefey; Jay D Keener; Leesa M Galatz; Ken Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Atrophy and fatty infiltration of the supraspinatus muscle: sonography versus MRI.

Authors:  Viviane Khoury; Etienne Cardinal; Paul Brassard
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Sonography of the painful shoulder: role of the operator's experience.

Authors:  Thomas Le Corroller; Michel Cohen; Richard Aswad; Vanessa Pauly; Pierre Champsaur
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  22 in total

1.  Prevalence of subscapularis tears and accuracy of shoulder ultrasound in pre-operative diagnosis.

Authors:  R Narasimhan; K Shamse; C Nash; D Dhingra; S Kennedy
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  How is shoulder ultrasound done in Italy? A survey of clinical practice.

Authors:  Marcello Zappia; Alberto Aliprandi; Simona Pozza; Fabio Martino Doniselli; Salvatore Gitto; Luca Maria Sconfienza
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  [Clinical or radiological diagnosis of impingement].

Authors:  J K Kloth; F Zeifang; M-A Weber
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Magnetic resonance arthrography is insufficiently accurate to diagnose biceps lesions prior to rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Elise Loock; Aude Michelet; Amaury D'Utruy; Pierre Molinazzi; Gerjon Hannink; Simon Bertiaux; Olivier Courage
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Comprehensive Shoulder US Examination: A Standardized Approach with Multimodality Correlation for Common Shoulder Disease.

Authors:  Matthew H Lee; Scott E Sheehan; John F Orwin; Kenneth S Lee
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 6.  [Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography : What is important in orthopedics and traumatology].

Authors:  F Mauch; B Drews
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  What is the prevalence of senior-athlete rotator cuff injuries and are they associated with pain and dysfunction?

Authors:  Patrick J McMahon; Amitesh Prasad; Kimberly A Francis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Management of Acute Work-Related Shoulder Injuries by an Early Shoulder Assessment Program: Efficiency of Imaging Investigations.

Authors:  Helen Razmjou; Sandra Lincoln; Christopher Geddes; Dragana Boljanovic; Iona Macritchie; Caterina Virdo-Cristello; Danielle Medeiros; Robin R Richards
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.037

Review 9.  Glossary of terms for musculoskeletal radiology.

Authors:  William Palmer; Laura Bancroft; Fiona Bonar; Jung-Ah Choi; Anne Cotten; James F Griffith; Philip Robinson; Christian W A Pfirrmann
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 10.  Complications of rotator cuff surgery-the role of post-operative imaging in patient care.

Authors:  R S Thakkar; S C Thakkar; U Srikumaran; E G McFarland; L M Fayad
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.