Literature DB >> 29573902

Computed tomography underestimates rotator cuff pathology in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

Megan Fitzgerald1, Sarah M Lawler1, Jeremiah T Lowe1, Ryan Nelson2, Matthew T Mantell2, Andrew Jawa3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) is the standard assessment of glenoid morphology before shoulder arthroplasty and is commonly used to evaluate rotator cuff pathology in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is not routinely used in this setting but has higher sensitivity in diagnosing full-thickness rotator cuff tears (RCT) and is considered the gold standard. The purpose of this study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of CT in diagnosing full-thickness RCTs and compare the evaluation of fatty infiltration and muscle atrophy on CT vs. MRI in the setting of GHOA.
METHODS: In this retrospective case-controlled study, we identified 49 patients from a prospectively maintained 2-surgeon registry who received preoperative CT and MRI scans for the evaluation of GHOA between 2011 and 2016. Three fellowship-trained shoulder surgeons assessed rotator cuff integrity, fatty infiltration, and muscle atrophy in the CT and MRI scans.
RESULTS: CT sensitivity and specificity were 20% and 95.5%, respectively. Fatty infiltration was significantly lower on CT for the supraspinatus (P = .003), infraspinatus (P < .001), and subscapularis (P = .0182), whereas muscle atrophy was significantly lower on CT for only the supraspinatus (P = .0023).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that CT underestimates the frequency of full-thickness RCTs and the severity of fatty infiltration and muscle atrophy in the setting of GHOA before total shoulder arthroplasty.
Copyright © 2018 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Primary osteoarthritis; atrophy; computed tomography; fatty infiltration; magnetic resonance imaging; rotator cuff; shoulder arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29573902     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.02.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  4 in total

1.  Is Advanced Imaging to Assess Rotator Cuff Integrity Before Shoulder Arthroplasty Cost-effective? A Decision Modeling Study.

Authors:  Jay M Levin; John Wickman; Alexander L Lazarides; Daniel J Cunningham; Daniel E Goltz; Richard C Mather; Oke Anakwenze; Tally E Lassiter; Christopher S Klifto
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 2.  Detecting Rotator Cuff Tears: A Network Meta-analysis of 144 Diagnostic Studies.

Authors:  Fanxiao Liu; Jinlei Dong; Wun-Jer Shen; Qinglin Kang; Dongsheng Zhou; Fei Xiong
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-02-05

3.  Radiographic greater tuberosity spurs and narrow acromiohumeral intervals are associated with advanced retraction of the supraspinatus tendon in patients with symptomatic rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Hao-Chun Chuang; Chih-Kai Hong; Kai-Lan Hsu; Fa-Chuan Kuan; Chen-Hao Chiang; Yueh Chen; Wei-Ren Su
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-11-26

4.  Can magnetic resonance imaging accurately and reliably measure humeral cortical thickness?

Authors:  Peter N Chalmers; Garrett V Christensen; Hiroaki Ishikawa; Heath B Henninger; Eugene G Kholmovski; Megan Mills; Robert Z Tashjian
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-12-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.