| Literature DB >> 33553392 |
Min Chen1, Yi Fang1, Yue Yang1, Pei-Jie He1, Lei Cheng1, Hai-Tao Wu2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Malignancy prediction remains important to preoperative diagnosis and postoperative follow-up in laryngeal neoplasm. AIM: To evaluate the circulating immune population and develop a nomogram for prediction of malignancy in patients with laryngeal neoplasm.Entities:
Keywords: Circulating immune cell; Laryngeal malignant lesion; Laryngeal neoplasm; Laryngeal premalignant lesion; Malignancy prediction; Nomogram
Year: 2021 PMID: 33553392 PMCID: PMC7829720 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i3.540
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Clin Cases ISSN: 2307-8960 Impact factor: 1.337
Clinical immune cell data of patients in the primary cohort
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Age, yr | 50.58 ± 8.66 | 59.91 ± 9.36 | 61.67 ± 9.58 | < 0.001 |
| Gender, male, | 37 (74.0%) | 52 (96.3%) | 52 (100%) | < 0.001 |
| Smokers, | 14 (28.0%) | 18 (33.3%) | 29 (55.8%) | 0.009 |
| Smoke index | 123.66 ± 245.44 | 235.74 ± 424.28 | 484.31 ± 447.77 | < 0.001 |
| Drinkers, | 6 (12.0%) | 9 (16.7%) | 14 (26.9%) | 0.140 |
| Drinker index | 1.40 ± 4.85 | 2.43 ± 7.21 | 4.37 ± 8.38 | 0.096 |
| Lymphocytes, % | 33.30 ± 9.02 | 29.89 ± 9.37 | 29.66 ± 8.57 | 0.077 |
| Monocytes, % | 6.86 ± 3.47 | 6.73 ± 1.41 | 7.80 ± 2.36 | 0.064 |
| Neutrophils, % | 57.86 ± 9.61 | 60.25 ± 11.08 | 59.95 ± 8.82 | 0.414 |
| NLR | 1.98 ± 1.02 | 2.43 ± 1.49 | 2.31 ± 1.09 | 0.158 |
| LMR | 5.29 ± 1.82 | 4.50 ± 1.33 | 4.24 ± 2.26 | 0.012 |
| CD3+ T cells, % | 68.48 ± 8.41 | 62.12 ± 12.00 | 61.82 ± 8.93 | 0.001 |
| CD8+ T cells, % | 25.77 ± 7.83 | 23.64 ± 7.82 | 23.30 ± 7.18 | 0.210 |
| CD4+ T cells, % | 39.13 ± 7.16 | 35.09 ± 8.21 | 36.11 ± 9.27 | 0.039 |
| NK cells, % | 17.35 ± 8.71 | 25.40 ± 12.65 | 24.80 ± 9.21 | < 0.001 |
| B cells, % | 13.46 ± 4.14 | 11.51 ± 4.29 | 12.31 + 6.63 | 0.157 |
| CD4/CD8+ T cell ratio | 1.71 ± 0.72 | 1.64 + 0.63 | 1.78 + 0.94 | 0.629 |
| NK/CD3+ T cell ratio | 0.27 ± 0.20 | 0.47 ± 0.45 | 0.44 ± 0.22 | 0.003 |
| NK/CD4+ T cell ratio | 0.46 ± 0.29 | 0.85 ± 0.78 | 0.79 ± 0.42 | 0.001 |
| NK/CD8+ T cell ratio | 0.75 ± 0.73 | 1.28 ± 1.35 | 1.23 ± 0.74 | 0.014 |
LMR: Lymphocyte to monocyte ratio; NK cell: Natural killer cell; NLR: Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio.
Figure 1Distribution and level of circulating immune cell parameters shown in violin plot. The circulating immune cell parameters, including lymphocyte to monocyte ratio, proportions of CD3+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, natural killer (NK) cells, NK cell to CD3+ T cell ratio, NK cell to CD4+ T cell ratio and NK cell to CD8+ T cell ratio, were compared among laryngeal lesions. aP < 0.05; bP < 0.01; cP < 0.001; dP < 0.0001.
Figure 2Clinical characteristic and immune feature selection using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator binary regression model. A: Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator coefficient profiles of the 20 features. Vertical line was drawn at the value where optimal lambda resulted in 13 features with nonzero coefficients; B: Feature selection in the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method via minimum criteria. Dotted vertical lines were drawn at the optimal values by using the minimum criteria.
Circulating immune features for prediction of laryngeal malignant lesion
|
|
|
|
|
| Intercept | -5.500 | < 0.0001 | |
| Monocytes, % | 1.235 | 2.351 (1.258-10.066) | 0.019 |
| CD8+ T cells, % | 2.154 | 3.303 (2.562-33.856) | < 0.001 |
| CD4+ T cells, % | 2.701 | 2.730 (2.422-123.774) | < 0.001 |
| B cells, % | 1.464 | 2.315 (1.320-16.195) | 0.021 |
| CD4/CD8+ T cell ratio | 2.425 | 2.004 (1.413-247.045) | 0.045 |
is the regression coefficient. Circulating immune features selected from least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method was entered into the multivariable logistic regression analysis. CI: Confidence interval.
Figure 3Development of the nomogram for malignancy prediction of laryngeal neoplasm. The nomogram incorporated the predictors including gender, age, smoke index, proportion of monocytes, CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells and B cells, and CD4/CD8+ T cell ratio.
Figure 4Validation of nomogram and assessment of clinical utility. A: Calibration curve of the nomogram in the validation cohort. The x-axis represents the predicted risk of cancer. The y-axis represents the actual diagnosis of cancer. The diagonal dotted line represents a perfect prediction by an ideal model. The solid line represents the performance of the nomogram, of which a closer fit to the diagonal dotted line represents a perfect prediction; B: Decision curve analysis for the nomogram in the validation cohort. The y-axis measures the net benefit. The gray line represents the assumption that all patients are laryngeal cancer. The thin solid line represents the assumption that no patients are laryngeal cancer. The thick solid line represents the nomogram.