Literature DB >> 33552753

The Planning Fallacy in the Orthopedic Operating Room.

Brian M Katt1, Amr Tawfik2, Vincent Lau3, Fortunato Padua2, Daniel Fletcher1, Bruce Stamos4, Daren Aita1, Evan Conte4, Arjun Saxena2, Joshua Hornstein4.   

Abstract

The planning fallacy posits that humans tend to underestimate the amount of time needed to complete a project and that greater complexity results in a larger difference in that estimation. If this phenomenon is present in the orthopedic operating room, it could lead to negative impacts on patients, their families, and physicians themselves. Nine fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons at one institution were asked to give an estimate of their operative and total room times over the course of three months. Over 759 cases, the surgeons underestimated the total room times by 17.3% (p = 0.034) but did not underestimate their operative times (p = 0.590). The surgeons improved estimation of their operative time for all cases from 13.6 to 10.9 minutes of their actual time (p = 0.031) by comparing the absolute difference for the surgeons' first 25% to the last 25% of cases. Procedures performed at the hospital underestimated operative and total room times by 8.9% and 7.4% compared to the ambulatory center, which overestimated operative times by 6.0% and underestimated total room times by 3.8% (p < 0.001). We found that the planning fallacy does exist in certain situations within the orthopedic operating room.
Copyright © 2021, Katt et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  efficiency; estimation; operating room; optimism bias; planning fallacy

Year:  2021        PMID: 33552753      PMCID: PMC7854319          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.12433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


  14 in total

1.  Delusions of success. How optimism undermines executives' decisions.

Authors:  Dan Lovallo; Daniel Kahneman
Journal:  Harv Bus Rev       Date:  2003-07

2.  Operating on a stretcher: a cost analysis.

Authors:  David N Garras; Pedro K Beredjiklian; Charles F Leinberry
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 2.230

3.  The optimism bias.

Authors:  Tali Sharot
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Estimating the duration of common elective operations: implications for operating list management.

Authors:  J J Pandit; A Carey
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 6.955

5.  Correcting memory improves accuracy of predicted task duration.

Authors:  Michael M Roy; Scott T Mitten; Nicholas J S Christenfeld
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2008-09

6.  Accuracy of predicting the duration of a surgical operation.

Authors:  Daniel M Laskin; A Omar Abubaker; Robert A Strauss
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Predicting the unpredictable: a new prediction model for operating room times using individual characteristics and the surgeon's estimate.

Authors:  Marinus J C Eijkemans; Mark van Houdenhoven; Tien Nguyen; Eric Boersma; Ewout W Steyerberg; Geert Kazemier
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Inpatient Versus Outpatient Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: Which Has Higher Patient Satisfaction?

Authors:  Mick P Kelly; Tyler E Calkins; Chris Culvern; Monica Kogan; Craig J Della Valle
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Association of Optimism With Cardiovascular Events and All-Cause Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alan Rozanski; Chirag Bavishi; Laura D Kubzansky; Randy Cohen
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-09-04

10.  Influence of preoperative emotional state on postoperative pain following orthopedic and trauma surgery.

Authors:  Gemma Robleda; Amalia Sillero-Sillero; Teresa Puig; Ignasi Gich; Josep-E Baños
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2014-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.