Literature DB >> 33552222

The management of error in ultrasound fetal growth monitoring.

Nicholas J Dudley1.   

Abstract

It is important to understand the uncertainty in fetal measurements when using them in the management of pregnancy. The aim of this essay is to provide background on errors and uncertainty, describing error sources and their potential impact, with guidance on improving accuracy. Errors can be systematic or random, arising from equipment, image plane selection, measurement method and caliper placement and influenced by image quality, training and experience. The uncertainty in measurements is larger than clinically significant differences in fetal size and growth. Errors can be reduced by implementing equipment acceptance testing, written procedures, training and audit.
© The Author(s) 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ultrasound; estimated fetal weight; fetal growth

Year:  2020        PMID: 33552222      PMCID: PMC7844476          DOI: 10.1177/1742271X20945749

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound        ISSN: 1742-271X


  13 in total

1.  Intra- and interobserver variability in fetal ultrasound measurements.

Authors:  I Sarris; C Ioannou; P Chamberlain; E Ohuma; F Roseman; L Hoch; D G Altman; A T Papageorghiou
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 7.299

2.  The importance of rigorous testing of circumference measuring callipers.

Authors:  N J Dudley; K Griffith
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Are ultrasound foetal circumference measurement methods interchangeable?

Authors:  Nicholas John Dudley
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2019-03-07

4.  Selection of appropriate ultrasound methods for the estimation of fetal weight.

Authors:  N J Dudley
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Quality assurance in obstetric ultrasound.

Authors:  N J Dudley; R Potter
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Charts of fetal size: 2. Head measurements.

Authors:  L S Chitty; D G Altman; A Henderson; S Campbell
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1994-01

7.  Charts of fetal size: 3. Abdominal measurements.

Authors:  L S Chitty; D G Altman; A Henderson; S Campbell
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1994-02

8.  Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements--a prospective study.

Authors:  F P Hadlock; R B Harrist; R S Sharman; R L Deter; S K Park
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1985-02-01       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Influence of fetal growth patterns on sonographic estimation of fetal weight.

Authors:  N V Simon; J S Levisky; D M Shearer; M S O'Lear; J T Flood
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  1987 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.910

10.  Estimation of birth weight by use of ultrasonographic formulas targeted to large-, appropriate-, and small-for-gestational-age fetuses.

Authors:  R E Sabbagha; J Minogue; R K Tamura; S A Hungerford
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 8.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.