Literature DB >> 33552150

Chemical composition, structures, and light absorption of N-containing aromatic compounds emitted from burning wood and charcoal in household cookstoves.

Mingjie Xie1, Zhenzhen Zhao1, Amara L Holder2, Michael D Hays2, Xi Chen2, Guofeng Shen3, James J Jetter2, Wyatt M Champion4, Qin'geng Wang5.   

Abstract

N-containing aromatic compounds (NACs) are an important group of light-absorbing molecules in the atmosphere. They are often observed in combustion emissions, but their chemical formulas and structural characteristics remain uncertain. In this study, red oak wood and charcoal fuels were burned in cookstoves using the standard water boiling test (WBT) procedure. Submicron aerosol particles in the cookstove emissions were collected using quartz (Q f ) and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) filter membranes positioned in parallel. A back-up quartz filter (Q b ) was also installed downstream of the PTFE filter to evaluate the effect of sampling artifact on NACs measurements. Liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy (LC-MS) techniques identified seventeen NAC chemical formulas in the cookstove emissions. The average concentrations of total NACs in Q b samples (0.37 ± 0.31 - 1.79 ± 0.77 μg m-3) were greater than 50% of those observed in the Q f samples (0.51 ± 0.43 - 3.91 ± 2.06 μg m-3), and the Q b to Q f mass ratios of individual NACs had a range of 0.02 - 2.71, indicating that the identified NACs might have substantial fractions remaining in the gas-phase. In comparison to other sources, cookstove emissions from red oak or charcoal fuels did not exhibit unique NAC structural features, but had distinct NACs composition. However, before identifying NACs sources by combining their structural and compositional information, the gas-particle partitioning behaviors of NACs should be further investigated. The average contributions of total NACs to the light absorption of organic matter at λ = 365 nm (1.10 - 2.57%) in Q f and Q b samples (10.7 - 21.0%) are up to 10 times larger than their mass contributions (Q f 0.31 - 1.01%, Q b 1.08 - 3.31%), so the identified NACs are mostly strong light absorbers. To explain more sample extracts absorption, future research is needed to understand the chemical and optical properties of high molecular weight (e.g., MW > 500 Da) entities in particulate matter.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33552150      PMCID: PMC7863623          DOI: 10.5194/acp-20-14077-2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys        ISSN: 1680-7316            Impact factor:   6.133


  30 in total

1.  Contribution of nitrated phenols to wood burning brown carbon light absorption in Detling, United Kingdom during winter time.

Authors:  Claudia Mohr; Felipe D Lopez-Hilfiker; Peter Zotter; André S H Prévôt; Lu Xu; Nga L Ng; Scott C Herndon; Leah R Williams; Jonathan P Franklin; Mark S Zahniser; Douglas R Worsnop; W Berk Knighton; Allison C Aiken; Kyle J Gorkowski; Manvendra K Dubey; James D Allan; Joel A Thornton
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Emission factors for carbonaceous particles and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from residential coal combustion in China.

Authors:  Yingjun Chen; Guoying Sheng; Xinhui Bi; Yanli Feng; Bixian Mai; Jiamo Fu
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Pollutant emissions and energy efficiency under controlled conditions for household biomass cookstoves and implications for metrics useful in setting international test standards.

Authors:  James Jetter; Yongxin Zhao; Kirk R Smith; Bernine Khan; Tiffany Yelverton; Peter Decarlo; Michael D Hays
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Positive matrix factorization of PM(2.5): comparison and implications of using different speciation data sets.

Authors:  Mingjie Xie; Michael P Hannigan; Steven J Dutton; Jana B Milford; Joshua G Hemann; Shelly L Miller; James J Schauer; Jennifer L Peel; Sverre Vedal
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Light absorption of organic carbon emitted from burning wood, charcoal, and kerosene in household cookstoves.

Authors:  Mingjie Xie; Guofeng Shen; Amara L Holder; Michael D Hays; James J Jetter
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 8.071

6.  Sources, composition and absorption Ångström exponent of light-absorbing organic components in aerosol extracts from the Los Angeles Basin.

Authors:  Xiaolu Zhang; Ying-Hsuan Lin; Jason D Surratt; Rodney J Weber
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Composition and light absorption of N-containing aromatic compounds in organic aerosols from laboratory biomass burning.

Authors:  Mingjie Xie; Xi Chen; Michael D Hays; Amara L Holder
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 6.133

8.  Reductions in emissions of carbonaceous particulate matter and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from combustion of biomass pellets in comparison with raw fuel burning.

Authors:  Guofeng Shen; Shu Tao; Siye Wei; Yanyan Zhang; Rong Wang; Bin Wang; Wei Li; Huizhong Shen; Ye Huang; Yuanchen Chen; Han Chen; Yifeng Yang; Wei Wang; Wen Wei; Xilong Wang; Wenxing Liu; Xuejun Wang; Staci L y Masse Simonich
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Millions dead: how do we know and what does it mean? Methods used in the comparative risk assessment of household air pollution.

Authors:  Kirk R Smith; Nigel Bruce; Kalpana Balakrishnan; Heather Adair-Rohani; John Balmes; Zoë Chafe; Mukesh Dherani; H Dean Hosgood; Sumi Mehta; Daniel Pope; Eva Rehfuess
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 21.981

10.  Solid fuel use for household cooking: country and regional estimates for 1980-2010.

Authors:  Sophie Bonjour; Heather Adair-Rohani; Jennyfer Wolf; Nigel G Bruce; Sumi Mehta; Annette Prüss-Ustün; Maureen Lahiff; Eva A Rehfuess; Vinod Mishra; Kirk R Smith
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.