Literature DB >> 33551738

The Effect of Spinal Cord Stimulation Frequency on the Neural Response and Perceived Sensation in Patients With Chronic Pain.

Gerrit Eduard Gmel1, Rosana Santos Escapa1, John L Parker1, Dave Mugan1, Adnan Al-Kaisy2, Stefano Palmisani2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effect of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) amplitude on the activation of dorsal column fibres has been widely studied through the recording of Evoked Compound Action Potentials (ECAPs), the sum of all action potentials elicited by an electrical stimulus applied to the fibres. ECAP amplitude grows linearly with stimulus current after a threshold, and a larger ECAP results in a stronger stimulus sensation for patients. This study investigates the effect of stimulus frequency on both the ECAP amplitude as well as the perceived stimulus sensation in patients undergoing SCS therapy for chronic back and/or leg pain.
METHODS: Patients suffering with chronic neuropathic lower-back and/or lower-limb pain undergoing an epidural SCS trial were recruited. Patients were implanted according to standard practice, having two 8-contact leads (8 mm inter-electrode spacing) which overlapped 2-4 contacts around the T9/T10 interspace. Both lead together thus spanning about three vertebral levels. Neurophysiological recordings were taken during the patient's trial phase at two routine follow-ups using a custom external stimulator capable of recording ECAPs in real-time from all non-stimulating contacts. Stimulation was performed at various vertebral levels, varying the frequency (ranging from 2 to 455 Hz) while all other stimulating variables were kept constant. During the experiments subjects were asked to rate the stimulation-induced sensation (paraesthesia) on a scale from 0 to 10.
RESULTS: Frequency response curves showed an inverse relationship between stimulation sensation strength and ECAP amplitude, with higher frequencies generating smaller ECAPs but stronger stimulation-induced paraesthesia (at constant stimulation amplitude). Both relationships followed logarithmic trends against stimulus frequency meaning that the effects on ECAP amplitude and sensation are larger for smaller frequencies.
CONCLUSION: This work supports the hypothesis that SCS-induced paraesthesia is conveyed through both frequency coding and population coding, fitting known psychophysics of tactile sensory information processing. The inverse relationship between ECAP amplitude and sensation for increasing frequencies at fixed stimulus amplitude questions common assumptions of monotonic relationships between ECAP amplitude and sensation strength.
Copyright © 2021 Gmel, Santos Escapa, Parker, Mugan, Al-Kaisy and Palmisani.

Entities:  

Keywords:  evoked compound action potential (ECAP); neural stimulation; spinal cord stimulation; stimulation frequency; stimulation sensation

Year:  2021        PMID: 33551738      PMCID: PMC7859107          DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.625835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Neurosci        ISSN: 1662-453X            Impact factor:   4.677


  28 in total

1.  High frequency stimulation can block axonal conduction.

Authors:  Alicia L Jensen; Dominique M Durand
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 5.330

Review 2.  Tactile intensity and population codes.

Authors:  Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Conductance changes, an electrogenic pump and the hyperpolarization of leech neurones following impulses.

Authors:  J K Jansen; J G Nicholls
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 4.  Pain mechanisms: a new theory.

Authors:  R Melzack; P D Wall
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-11-19       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Activity-dependent excitability changes in normal and demyelinated rat spinal root axons.

Authors:  H Bostock; P Grafe
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Modulation of activity and conduction in single dorsal column axons by kilohertz-frequency spinal cord stimulation.

Authors:  Nathan D Crosby; John J Janik; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Success Using Neuromodulation With BURST (SUNBURST) Study: Results From a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial Using a Novel Burst Waveform.

Authors:  Timothy Deer; Konstantin V Slavin; Kasra Amirdelfan; Richard B North; Allen W Burton; Thomas L Yearwood; Ed Tavel; Peter Staats; Steven Falowski; Jason Pope; Rafael Justiz; Alain Y Fabi; Alexander Taghva; Richard Paicius; Timothy Houden; Derron Wilson
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2017-09-29

Review 8.  Principles of cord activation during spinal cord stimulation.

Authors:  Gabriela Molnar; Giancarlo Barolat
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2014-06

9.  Simulation Study of Intermittent Axonal Block and Desynchronization Effect Induced by High-Frequency Stimulation of Electrical Pulses.

Authors:  Zheshan Guo; Zhouyan Feng; Yang Wang; Xuefeng Wei
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Comparison of Spinal Cord Stimulation Waveforms for Treating Chronic Low Back Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jay Karri; Vwaire Orhurhu; Sayed Wahezi; Tuan Tang; Timothy Deer; Alaa Abd-Elsayed
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Advances in Pain Medicine: a Review of New Technologies.

Authors:  Natalie Strand; Maloney J; Vinicius Tieppo Francio; Murphy M; Michal Turkiewicz; Antonios El Helou; Maita M; Covington S; Singh N; Peck J; Wie C
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2022-07-29

2.  The Evoked Compound Action Potential as a Predictor for Perception in Chronic Pain Patients: Tools for Automatic Spinal Cord Stimulator Programming and Control.

Authors:  Julie G Pilitsis; Krishnan V Chakravarthy; Andrew J Will; Karen C Trutnau; Kristin N Hageman; David A Dinsmoor; Leonid M Litvak
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 4.677

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.