Literature DB >> 33550343

[Influence of trueness for local finish lines of a full crown preparation on that of complete finish line].

N Jiang1, X D Bao1, L Yue1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the factors affecting the trueness of finish lines of full crown preparations in digital impressions.
METHODS: A full crown preparation of the right maxillary molar was prepared on the standard resin dentition model, the trueness of the finish lines, the full crown preparation in the whole dentition and the isolated full crown preparation were measured respectively. Detection of scanning trueness of the finish lines of the full crown preparation in the whole dentition: (1) Using Imetric scanner to scan the full crown preparation, obtaining STL (Stereo lithographic) format data as the reference true value; (2) Using CEREC Omnicam oral scanner and 3Shape TRIOS oral scanner to scan the full crown preparation, obtaining all the STL format data, import Geomagic Studio 2013 software, extraction of images and data of the complete finish lines or local finish lines (mesial, distal, buccal, lingual) of the full crown preparation, then using the data to 3D Compare Analysis with the reference true value, outputting RMS (root mean square) values which could evaluate the scanning trueness, the lower RMS value was, the lower the trueness was. The detection of scanning trueness of the finish lines of the isolated full crown preparation: (1) the anterior and posterior adjacent teeth of the preparation were removed to establish the model of the isolated full crown preparation; (2) CEREC Omnicam oral scanner and 3Shape TRIOS oral scanner were used to scan the isolated preparations, and each group was repeated 6 times. Data collection and analysis were the same as the first part, that is, detection of scanning trueness of finish lines of the full crown preparation in the whole dentition.
RESULTS: In the whole dentition, (1) the RMS value [(44±7) μm] of CEREC Omnicam oral scanner scanning complete finish lines was greater than that of 3Shape TRIOS oral scanner [(35±6) μm](P < 0.05). (2) the RMS values of the mesial [(45±9) μm], buccal [(38±3) μm] and lingual [(40±3) μm] finish lines in CEREC Omnicam oral scanner scanning were all lower than that in distal [(63±7) μm](P < 0.05), and the RMS values in mesial were higher than that in buccal and lingual (P>0.05). The RMS values of 3Shape TRIOS oral scanner scanning mesial and distal finish lines were significantly higher than those of the buccal and lingual side (P>0.05), in which:(45±8) μm in mesial, (50±10) μm in the distal, (33±8) μm in the buccal and (33±6) μm in the lingual side. The RMS value of CEREC Omnicam oral scanner scanning distal finish line was greater than that of 3Shape TRIOS oral scanner (P < 0.05). Without adjacent teeth, (1) the RMS values of the complete finish lines of CEREC Omnicam oral scanner and 3 Shape TRIOS oral scanner were significantly reduced (P < 0.05), including CEREC Omnicam oral scanner (34±3) μm and 3 Shape TRIOS oral scanner (26±4) μm; (2) the RMS values of the buccal and lingual finish lines of CEREC Omnicam oral scanner and 3Shape TRIOS oral scanner showed no significant changes (P>0.05), among which, CEREC Omnicam oral scanner buccal (44±7) μm, lingual (43±3) μm, 3Shape TRIOS oral scanner buccal (29±5) μm, lingual (40±7) μm. The RMS values of CEREC Omnicam oral scanner and 3Shape TRIOS oral scanner were significantly reduced and there was no significant difference between them (P>0.05). CEREC Omnicam oral scanner (32±8) μm and 3Shape TRIOS oral scanner (32±6) μm. The RMS values of the distal finish lines of CEREC Omnicam oral scanner and 3 Shape TRIOS oral scanner also decreased significantly (P < 0.05), and CEREC Omnicam oral scanner (38±3) μm decreased more significantly, similar to 3Shape TRIOS oral scanner (36±1) μm, P>0.05.
CONCLUSION: When adjacent teeth exist in the full crown preparation, the mesial and distal parts of the finish line will be blocked by adjacent teeth, which will affect the trueness of the local finish line, and ultimately reduce the trueness of the complete finish line.

Keywords:  Finish line; Intraoral scanners; Preparation; Trueness

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33550343      PMCID: PMC7867983     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban        ISSN: 1671-167X


  8 in total

1.  Influence of different convergence angles and tooth preparation heights on the internal adaptation of Cerec crowns.

Authors:  Shu-Hui Mou; Tsongi Chai; Juo-Song Wang; Yuh-Yuan Shiau
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.426

2.  Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate partial crowns in vitro: a three-dimensional analysis of accuracy and reproducibility.

Authors:  Oliver Schaefer; David C Watts; Bernd W Sigusch; Harald Kuepper; Arndt Guentsch
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 5.304

3.  Comparison of marginal fit of Lava CAD/CAM crown-copings with two finish lines.

Authors:  Dino Re; Francesca Cerutti; Gabriele Augusti; Antonio Cerutti; Davide Augusti
Journal:  Int J Esthet Dent       Date:  2014

4.  [Evaluation of the quality of three-dimensional data acquired by using two kinds of structure light intra-oral scanner to scan the crown preparation model].

Authors:  X Y Zhang; H Li; Y J Zhao; Y Wang; Y C Sun
Journal:  Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2016-07

5.  Accuracy of single-abutment digital cast obtained using intraoral and cast scanners.

Authors:  Jae-Jun Lee; Ii-Do Jeong; Jin-Young Park; Jin-Hun Jeon; Ji-Hwan Kim; Woong-Chul Kim
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.426

6.  Comparing the accuracy (trueness and precision) of models of fixed dental prostheses fabricated by digital and conventional workflows.

Authors:  Ji-Young Sim; Yeon Jang; Woong-Chul Kim; Hae-Young Kim; Dong-Hwan Lee; Ji-Hwan Kim
Journal:  J Prosthodont Res       Date:  2018-03-31       Impact factor: 4.642

Review 7.  Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature.

Authors:  Francesco Mangano; Andrea Gandolfi; Giuseppe Luongo; Silvia Logozzo
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  Finish line distinctness and accuracy in 7 intraoral scanners versus conventional impression: an in vitro descriptive comparison.

Authors:  Robert Nedelcu; Pontus Olsson; Ingela Nyström; Andreas Thor
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 2.757

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.