Robbin Romijnders1,2, Elke Warmerdam3,4, Clint Hansen4, Julius Welzel4, Gerhard Schmidt3, Walter Maetzler4. 1. Digital Signal Processing and System Theory, Institute of Electrical and Information Engineering, Kiel University, Kaiserstraße 2, 24143, Kiel, Germany. robr@tf.uni-kiel.de. 2. Neurogeriatrics, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, Haus D, 24105, Kiel, Germany. robr@tf.uni-kiel.de. 3. Digital Signal Processing and System Theory, Institute of Electrical and Information Engineering, Kiel University, Kaiserstraße 2, 24143, Kiel, Germany. 4. Neurogeriatrics, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, Haus D, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Identification of individual gait events is essential for clinical gait analysis, because it can be used for diagnostic purposes or tracking disease progression in neurological diseases such as Parkinson's disease. Previous research has shown that gait events can be detected from a shank-mounted inertial measurement unit (IMU), however detection performance was often evaluated only from straight-line walking. For use in daily life, the detection performance needs to be evaluated in curved walking and turning as well as in single-task and dual-task conditions. METHODS: Participants (older adults, people with Parkinson's disease, or people who had suffered from a stroke) performed three different walking trials: (1) straight-line walking, (2) slalom walking, (3) Stroop-and-walk trial. An optical motion capture system was used a reference system. Markers were attached to the heel and toe regions of the shoe, and participants wore IMUs on the lateral sides of both shanks. The angular velocity of the shank IMUs was used to detect instances of initial foot contact (IC) and final foot contact (FC), which were compared to reference values obtained from the marker trajectories. RESULTS: The detection method showed high recall, precision and F1 scores in different populations for both initial contacts and final contacts during straight-line walking (IC: recall [Formula: see text] 100%, precision [Formula: see text] 100%, F1 score [Formula: see text] 100%; FC: recall [Formula: see text] 100%, precision [Formula: see text] 100%, F1 score [Formula: see text] 100%), slalom walking (IC: recall [Formula: see text] 100%, precision [Formula: see text] 99%, F1 score [Formula: see text]100%; FC: recall [Formula: see text] 100%, precision [Formula: see text] 99%, F1 score [Formula: see text]100%), and turning (IC: recall [Formula: see text] 85%, precision [Formula: see text] 95%, F1 score [Formula: see text]91%; FC: recall [Formula: see text] 84%, precision [Formula: see text] 95%, F1 score [Formula: see text]89%). CONCLUSIONS: Shank-mounted IMUs can be used to detect gait events during straight-line walking, slalom walking and turning. However, more false events were observed during turning and more events were missed during turning. For use in daily life we recommend identifying turning before extracting temporal gait parameters from identified gait events.
BACKGROUND: Identification of individual gait events is essential for clinical gait analysis, because it can be used for diagnostic purposes or tracking disease progression in neurological diseases such as Parkinson's disease. Previous research has shown that gait events can be detected from a shank-mounted inertial measurement unit (IMU), however detection performance was often evaluated only from straight-line walking. For use in daily life, the detection performance needs to be evaluated in curved walking and turning as well as in single-task and dual-task conditions. METHODS:Participants (older adults, people with Parkinson's disease, or people who had suffered from a stroke) performed three different walking trials: (1) straight-line walking, (2) slalom walking, (3) Stroop-and-walk trial. An optical motion capture system was used a reference system. Markers were attached to the heel and toe regions of the shoe, and participants wore IMUs on the lateral sides of both shanks. The angular velocity of the shank IMUs was used to detect instances of initial foot contact (IC) and final foot contact (FC), which were compared to reference values obtained from the marker trajectories. RESULTS: The detection method showed high recall, precision and F1 scores in different populations for both initial contacts and final contacts during straight-line walking (IC: recall [Formula: see text] 100%, precision [Formula: see text] 100%, F1 score [Formula: see text] 100%; FC: recall [Formula: see text] 100%, precision [Formula: see text] 100%, F1 score [Formula: see text] 100%), slalom walking (IC: recall [Formula: see text] 100%, precision [Formula: see text] 99%, F1 score [Formula: see text]100%; FC: recall [Formula: see text] 100%, precision [Formula: see text] 99%, F1 score [Formula: see text]100%), and turning (IC: recall [Formula: see text] 85%, precision [Formula: see text] 95%, F1 score [Formula: see text]91%; FC: recall [Formula: see text] 84%, precision [Formula: see text] 95%, F1 score [Formula: see text]89%). CONCLUSIONS:Shank-mounted IMUs can be used to detect gait events during straight-line walking, slalom walking and turning. However, more false events were observed during turning and more events were missed during turning. For use in daily life we recommend identifying turning before extracting temporal gait parameters from identified gait events.
Authors: Minh H Pham; Morad Elshehabi; Linda Haertner; Silvia Del Din; Karin Srulijes; Tanja Heger; Matthis Synofzik; Markus A Hobert; Gert S Faber; Clint Hansen; Dina Salkovic; Joaquim J Ferreira; Daniela Berg; Álvaro Sanchez-Ferro; Jaap H van Dieën; Clemens Becker; Lynn Rochester; Gerhard Schmidt; Walter Maetzler Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2017-09-04 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Yong Kuk Kim; Rosa M S Visscher; Elke Viehweger; Navrag B Singh; William R Taylor; Florian Vogl Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-10-13 Impact factor: 3.752