Literature DB >> 21884950

Invasive acute hemodynamic response to guide left ventricular lead implantation predicts chronic remodeling in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Simon G Duckett1, Matthew Ginks, Anoop K Shetty, Julian Bostock, Jaswinder S Gill, Shoaib Hamid, Stam Kapetanakis, Eliane Cunliffe, Reza Razavi, Gerry Carr-White, C Aldo Rinaldi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the relationship between acute hemodynamic response (AHR) and reverse remodeling (RR) in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
BACKGROUND: CRT reduces mortality and morbidity in heart failure patients; however, up to 30% of patients do not derive symptomatic benefit. Higher proportions do not remodel. Multicenter trials have shown echocardiographic techniques are poor at improving response rates. We hypothesized the degree of AHR at implant can predict which patients remodel.
METHODS: Thirty-three patients undergoing CRT (21 dilated and 12 ischemic cardiomyopathy) were studied. Left ventricular (LV) volumes were assessed before and after CRT. The AHR (maximum rate of left ventricular pressure [LV-dP/dt(max)]) was assessed at implant with a pressure wire in the LV cavity. Largest percentage rise in LV-dP/dt(max) from baseline (atrial antibradycardia pacing or right ventricular pacing with atrial fibrillation) to dual-chamber pacing (DDD)-LV was used to determine optimal coronary sinus LV lead position. Reverse remodeling was defined as reduction in LV end systolic volume ≥15% at 6 months.
RESULTS: The LV-dP/dt(max) increased significantly from baseline (801 ± 194 mm Hg/s to 924 ± 203 mm Hg/s, p < 0.001) with DDD-LV pacing for the optimal LV lead position. The LV end systolic volume decreased from 186 ± 68 ml to 157 ± 68 ml (p < 0.001). Eighteen (56%) patients exhibited RR. There was a significant relationship between percentage rise in LV-dP/dt(max) and RR for DDD-LV pacing (p < 0.001). A similar relationship for AHR and RR in dilated cardiomyopathy and ischemic cardiomyopathy (p = 0.01 and p = 0.006) was seen.
CONCLUSIONS: Acute hemodynamic response to LV pacing is useful for predicting which patients are likely to remodel in response to CRT both for dilated cardiomyopathy and ischemic cardiomyopathy. Using AHR has the potential to guide LV lead positioning and improve response rates.
Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21884950     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.04.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  41 in total

Review 1.  Updates in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy for Chronic Heart Failure: Review of Multisite Pacing.

Authors:  Antonios P Antoniadis; Ben Sieniewicz; Justin Gould; Bradley Porter; Jessica Webb; Simon Claridge; Jonathan M Behar; Christopher Aldo Rinaldi
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2017-10

2.  Optimizing cardiac resynchronization therapy to minimize ATP consumption heterogeneity throughout the left ventricle: a simulation analysis using a canine heart failure model.

Authors:  Yuxuan Hu; Viatcheslav Gurev; Jason Constantino; Natalia Trayanova
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 3.  ICE Guided CRT: Is there Evidence of Reverse Remodeling?

Authors:  Antonio Rossillo; Angelo B Ramondo
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-02-29

4.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy update: evolving indications, expanding benefit?

Authors:  C Butcher; Y Mareev; V Markides; M Mason; T Wong; J G F Cleland
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 5.  Multisite Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Promise and Pitfalls.

Authors:  Antonios P Antoniadis; Jonathan M Behar; Simon Claridge; Tom Jackson; Manav Sohal; Christopher Aldo Rinaldi
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Emerging Therapeutic Approaches.

Authors:  Neal A Chatterjee; E Kevin Heist
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-03-06

7.  Electrical latency predicts the optimal left ventricular endocardial pacing site: results from a multicentre international registry.

Authors:  Benjamin J Sieniewicz; Jonathan M Behar; Manav Sohal; Justin Gould; Simon Claridge; Bradley Porter; Steve Niederer; James H P Gamble; Tim R Betts; Pierre Jais; Nicolas Derval; David D Spragg; Paul Steendijk; Berry M van Gelder; Frank A Bracke; Christopher A Rinaldi
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 5.214

8.  Rationale and design of a randomized trial to assess the safety and efficacy of MultiPoint Pacing (MPP) in cardiac resynchronization therapy: The MPP Trial.

Authors:  Gery Tomassoni; James Baker; Raffaele Corbisiero; Charles Love; David Martin; Robert Sheppard; Seth J Worley; Kwangdeok Lee; Imran Niazi
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 1.468

9.  Current Evidence and Recommendations for Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy.

Authors:  Matthew J Dewhurst; Nicholas J Linker
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2014-05-30

Review 10.  Strategies to improve cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Kevin Vernooy; Caroline J M van Deursen; Marc Strik; Frits W Prinzen
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 32.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.