Literature DB >> 33546423

Effects of Orange Pulp Conservation Methods (Dehydrated or Ensiled Sun-Dried) on the Nutritional Value for Finishing Pigs and Implications on Potential Gaseous Emissions from Slurry.

Pablo Ferrer1,2, Paloma García-Rebollar3, Salvador Calvet2, Carlos de Blas3, Olga Piquer4, Carlos A Rodríguez3, Alba Cerisuelo1.   

Abstract

The inclusion of orange pulp (OP) in pig diets may promote the circular economy, but drying procedures might influence its nutritional value and environmental impact. The purpose of this study was to determine the energy value and nutrient digestibility of dehydrated (DOP) and ensiled sun dried (ESDOP) orange pulp. The potential ammonia (NH3) and methane (CH4) emissions derived from slurry were also measured. Digestible energies of 14.2 and 13.2 MJ/kg DM for DOP and ESDOP, respectively, were estimated by difference after a 500 g/kg substitution of a basal diet with OPs. A high fiber digestion efficiency was observed for both OPs. Pigs fed the basal diet showed a higher intake and a greater excretion of urine N than pigs fed with OP, but fecal N excretion did not differ among diets. A higher benzoic and hippuric acid content in urine was observed in OP than in basal diet. Altogether, these findings explained a lower pH in slurry of OP diets and a reduction of potential NH3 emissions. The biochemical CH4 potential also decreased, especially with ESDOP. Overall, both OP are relevant sources of energy for pig diets. Their inclusion in feeds generate favorable changes of slurry characteristics that reduce potential NH3 and CH4 emissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  conservation method; energy value; nutrient balance; orange pulp; potential gas emission

Year:  2021        PMID: 33546423      PMCID: PMC7913570          DOI: 10.3390/ani11020387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animals (Basel)        ISSN: 2076-2615            Impact factor:   2.752


  13 in total

1.  Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beakers or crucibles: collaborative study.

Authors:  David R Mertens
Journal:  J AOAC Int       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.913

2.  Resource consumption and environmental impacts of the agrofood sector: life cycle assessment of italian citrus-based products.

Authors:  Marco Beccali; Maurizio Cellura; Maria Iudicello; Marina Mistretta
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: a proposed protocol for batch assays.

Authors:  I Angelidaki; M Alves; D Bolzonella; L Borzacconi; J L Campos; A J Guwy; S Kalyuzhnyi; P Jenicek; J B van Lier
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.915

4.  A new algorithm to characterize biodegradability of biomass during anaerobic digestion: influence of lignin concentration on methane production potential.

Authors:  Jin M Triolo; Sven G Sommer; Henrik B Møller; Martin R Weisbjerg; Xin Y Jiang
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 9.642

Review 5.  Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition.

Authors:  P J Van Soest; J B Robertson; B A Lewis
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.034

6.  Influence of dietary factors on nitrogen partitioning and composition of urine and feces of fattening pigs.

Authors:  T T Canh; M W Verstegen; A J Aarnink; J W Schrama
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Microbial aromatic acid metabolites formed in the gut account for a major fraction of the polyphenols excreted in urine of rats fed red wine polyphenols.

Authors:  Marie-Paule Gonthier; Véronique Cheynier; Jennifer L Donovan; Claudine Manach; Christine Morand; Isabelle Mila; Catherine Lapierre; Christian Rémésy; Augustin Scalbert
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.798

8.  Direct and regression methods do not give different estimates of digestible and metabolizable energy of wheat for pigs.

Authors:  O A Bolarinwa; O Adeola
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Nutrient digestibility of degermed, dehulled corn, citrus pulp, and soy protein concentrate by barrows.

Authors:  U S Ruiz; M C Tomaz; L A F Pascoal; P H Watanabe; A B Amorim; G M P Melo; E Daniel
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Fiber effects in nutrition and gut health in pigs.

Authors:  Jan Erik Lindberg
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2014-03-01
View more
  1 in total

1.  Effects of treating Prosopis juliflora pods with multienzyme, with and without bacterial cultures on in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD), fermentation kinetics, and performance of growing pigs.

Authors:  Ngugi David Marii; Olivier Basole Kashongwe; Anthony Macharia King'ori
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 1.559

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.