Literature DB >> 35239066

Effects of treating Prosopis juliflora pods with multienzyme, with and without bacterial cultures on in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD), fermentation kinetics, and performance of growing pigs.

Ngugi David Marii1, Olivier Basole Kashongwe2,3, Anthony Macharia King'ori2.   

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the effects of treating Prosopis juliflora pods with multienzyme and bacterial cultures on in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD), fermentation kinetics, and performance of growing pigs. Experiment one consisted of a pepsin-pancreatine hydrolysis method to simulate, in vitro, the pig digestive system and was followed by in vitro gas production to assess fermentation kinetics. Samples of ground Prosopis pod meal (GPPM) were allocated to four treatments with three replicates each. Treatments included GPPM treated with multienzyme (Natuzyme®) (T1); untreated (GPPM) (T2); GPPM fermented with (Lactobacillus plantarum MTD1 Ecosyl ®) (T3), and GPPM treated using natural fermentation (T4). The second experiment assessed the performance of pigs fed the best treatment from experiment 1. Thirty Landrace × large white crosses of 20 ± 2 kg were allotted to five treatments with six pigs each (replicates). The dietary treatments were PC, 0% GPPM + enzyme; NC, 0% GPPM and 0% enzyme; D1, 10% GPPM + enzyme; D2, 20% GPPM + enzyme; and D3, 30% GPPM + enzyme. A randomized complete block design was used for both experiments. Enzyme treatment (T1) and T3 improved the IVDMD of the GPPM compared to T2 by 3.68% and 1.2%, respectively (p < 0.05). Cumulative gas was highest and Tmax lowest for T1 but significantly different only to T4 (p < 0.05). Average daily gain and intake were highest for pigs fed GPPM up to 10% (PC, D1). Feed conversion ratio increased with the level of GPPM in the diet. The results suggest Prosopis juliflora pods treated with enzymes can be added in pig diets up to 30%.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fermentation kinetics; Pig nutrition; Prosopis juliflora pod meal

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35239066     DOI: 10.1007/s11250-022-03105-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod        ISSN: 0049-4747            Impact factor:   1.559


  10 in total

Review 1.  Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition.

Authors:  P J Van Soest; J B Robertson; B A Lewis
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.034

2.  Effect of applying lactic acid bacteria and cellulase on the fermentation quality, nutritive value, tannins profile and in vitro digestibility of Neolamarckia cadamba leaves silage.

Authors:  Liwen He; Wei Zhou; Yi Wang; Cheng Wang; Xiaoyang Chen; Qing Zhang
Journal:  J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl)       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 2.130

3.  Breeding objectives for pigs in Kenya. II: economic values incorporating risks in different smallholder production systems.

Authors:  Jackson Mwenda Mbuthia; Thomas Odiwuor Rewe; Alexander Kigunzu Kahi
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2014-11-30       Impact factor: 1.559

4.  Isolation of microsatellites from the spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) candidate region on chromosome 5q and linkage analysis in Spanish SMA families.

Authors:  E Velasco; C Valero; E García; A de la Puente; J Cruces; J L San Millán; I del Castillo; A Coloma; F Moreno; C Hernández-Chico
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  In vitro digestion and fermentation characteristics of canola co-products simulate their digestion in the pig intestine.

Authors:  T A Woyengo; R Jha; E Beltranena; R T Zijlstra
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Dietary enzyme addition on the growth performance and carcass characteristics of pigs fed diets containing avocado oil cake silage.

Authors:  B D Nkosi; M L Seshoka; P J Fourie; A T Kanengoni; I M M Malebana; R S Thomas
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 1.559

7.  Characteristics of the smallholder free-range pig production system in western Kenya.

Authors:  John M Kagira; Paul W N Kanyari; Ndicho Maingi; Samuel M Githigia; J C Ng'ang'a; Julia W Karuga
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 1.559

8.  Effect of incorporation of ground Prosopis juliflora pods in layer diet on weight gain, egg production, and natural antibody titer in KALRO genetically improved indigenous chicken.

Authors:  Joel Onyango Khobondo; Anthony Macharia Kingori; Antonio Manhique
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2019-05-25       Impact factor: 1.893

9.  Effects of Supplemental Beta-mannanase on Digestible Energy and Metabolizable Energy Contents of Copra Expellers and Palm Kernel Expellers Fed to Pigs.

Authors:  W B Kwon; B G Kim
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.509

10.  Effects of Orange Pulp Conservation Methods (Dehydrated or Ensiled Sun-Dried) on the Nutritional Value for Finishing Pigs and Implications on Potential Gaseous Emissions from Slurry.

Authors:  Pablo Ferrer; Paloma García-Rebollar; Salvador Calvet; Carlos de Blas; Olga Piquer; Carlos A Rodríguez; Alba Cerisuelo
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 2.752

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.