Ghassan B Hamra1, Richard F Maclehose2, Lisa Croen3, Elizabeth M Kauffman4, Craig Newschaffer1,5. 1. Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. 2. Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. 3. Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA 94612, USA. 4. AJ Drexel Autism Institute, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. 5. College of Health and Human Development, Penn State University, State College, PA 16801, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Methods exist to study exposure mixtures, but each is distinct in the research question it aims to address. We propose a new approach focused on estimating both the summed effect and individual weights of one or multiple exposure mixtures: Bayesian Weighted Sums (BWS). METHODS: We applied BWS to simulated and real datasets with correlated exposures. The analytic context in our real-world example is an estimation of the association between polybrominated diphenyl ether (PBDE) congeners (28, 47, 99, 100, and 153) and Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) diagnosis and Social Responsiveness Scores (SRS). RESULTS: Simulations demonstrate that BWS performs reliably. In adjusted models using Early Autism Risk Longitudinal Investigation (EARLI) data, the odds of ASD for a 1-unit increase in the weighted sum of PBDEs were 1.41 (95% highest posterior density 0.82, 2.50) times the odds of ASD for the unexposed and the change in z-score standardized SRS per 1 unit increase in the weighted sum of PBDEs is 0.15 (95% highest posterior density -0.08, 0.38). CONCLUSIONS: BWS provides a means of estimating the summed effect and weights for individual components of a mixture. This approach is distinct from other exposure mixture tools. BWS may be more flexible than existing approaches and can be specified to allow multiple exposure groups based on a priori knowledge from epidemiology or toxicology.
OBJECTIVES: Methods exist to study exposure mixtures, but each is distinct in the research question it aims to address. We propose a new approach focused on estimating both the summed effect and individual weights of one or multiple exposure mixtures: Bayesian Weighted Sums (BWS). METHODS: We applied BWS to simulated and real datasets with correlated exposures. The analytic context in our real-world example is an estimation of the association between polybrominated diphenyl ether (PBDE) congeners (28, 47, 99, 100, and 153) and Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) diagnosis and Social Responsiveness Scores (SRS). RESULTS: Simulations demonstrate that BWS performs reliably. In adjusted models using Early Autism Risk Longitudinal Investigation (EARLI) data, the odds of ASD for a 1-unit increase in the weighted sum of PBDEs were 1.41 (95% highest posterior density 0.82, 2.50) times the odds of ASD for the unexposed and the change in z-score standardized SRS per 1 unit increase in the weighted sum of PBDEs is 0.15 (95% highest posterior density -0.08, 0.38). CONCLUSIONS: BWS provides a means of estimating the summed effect and weights for individual components of a mixture. This approach is distinct from other exposure mixture tools. BWS may be more flexible than existing approaches and can be specified to allow multiple exposure groups based on a priori knowledge from epidemiology or toxicology.
Authors: Martin Van den Berg; Linda S Birnbaum; Michael Denison; Mike De Vito; William Farland; Mark Feeley; Heidelore Fiedler; Helen Hakansson; Annika Hanberg; Laurie Haws; Martin Rose; Stephen Safe; Dieter Schrenk; Chiharu Tohyama; Angelika Tritscher; Jouko Tuomisto; Mats Tysklind; Nigel Walker; Richard E Peterson Journal: Toxicol Sci Date: 2006-07-07 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Daniel Messinger; Gregory S Young; Sally Ozonoff; Karen Dobkins; Alice Carter; Lonnie Zwaigenbaum; Rebecca J Landa; Tony Charman; Wendy L Stone; John N Constantino; Ted Hutman; Leslie J Carver; Susan Bryson; Jana M Iverson; Mark S Strauss; Sally J Rogers; Marian Sigman Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2013-02-08 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Jennifer F Bobb; Linda Valeri; Birgit Claus Henn; David C Christiani; Robert O Wright; Maitreyi Mazumdar; John J Godleski; Brent A Coull Journal: Biostatistics Date: 2014-12-22 Impact factor: 5.279
Authors: Alexander P Keil; Jessie P Buckley; Katie M O'Brien; Kelly K Ferguson; Shanshan Zhao; Alexandra J White Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2020-04-07 Impact factor: 9.031