Literature DB >> 33546070

CTPA pulmonary artery distensibility in assessment of severity of acute pulmonary embolism and right ventricular function.

Dawei Wang1, Fei Yang2, Xiaolong Zhu2, Shujun Cui2, Shanglin Dong2, Zhenming Zhang1, Yujiao Zhang2.   

Abstract

ABSTRACT: To investigate the characteristics of pulmonary artery distensibility (PAD) in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (APE) and to assess the correlation of PAD with APE severity and right ventricular function. A total of 33 patients who underwent retrospective electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) with a definite diagnosis of APE were included in the study. According to APE severity, the patients were divided into severe (SPE) and non-severe (NSPE) groups. Data from a control group without APE matching the basic demographics of the APE patients were collected. Pulmonary artery distensibility (PAD) and right ventricular function parameters were compared among the 3 groups, their relationships were investigated, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the above parameters for the diagnosis of APE severity. The PAD values of the control, NSPE, and SPE groups were (7.877 ± 2.637) × 10-3 mm/Hg, (6.050 ± 2.011) × 10-3 mm/Hg, (4.321 ± 1.717) × 10-3 mm/Hg, respectively (P < .01). There were statistically significant differences in right ventricular function parameters among the 3 groups (P < .05). The correlation analysis between PAD and right ventricular function parameters showed a weak negative correlation (r = -0.281--0.392). The area under the ROC curve of PAD was 0.743, the critical value was 4.200, and the sensitivity and specificity were 62.5% and 94.1%, respectively. The PAD obtained by retrospective ECG-gated CTPA could accurately evaluate APE severity and right ventricular function. As the severity of APE increases, PAD decreases, which is helpful to identify patients at high risk of APE.
Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33546070      PMCID: PMC7837935          DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)        ISSN: 0025-7974            Impact factor:   1.889


Introduction

Acute pulmonary embolism (APE) is a common condition associated with high morbidity and mortality.[ Right ventricular dysfunction is a reliable prognostic predictor, and right ventricular failure is a major cause of death related to APE within 30 days.[ Therefore, a timely and accurate assessment of right ventricular failure and APE severity is of high importance. Retrospective electrocardiograph (ECG)-gated computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is a reliable method to assess ventricular volumes and ejection fraction and can be combined with CTPA to establish a diagnosis of APE with high sensitivity and specificity.[ The conventional radiologic features indicating APE severity includes right ventricle (RV) dilation, an increased ratio of RV to left ventricle (LV), and pulmonary trunk size.[ In recent years, pulmonary artery distensibility (PAD) has been suggested to be a sensitive and specific marker for pulmonary hypertension, and this is generally measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and echocardiography.[ However, the use of CTPA on PAD is rarely reported. One study showed that PAD measured using ECG-gated CTPA correlated with pulmonary hemodynamics measured by right heart catheterization in subjects with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.[ Our previous research confirmed that retrospective ECG-gated CTPA could be used to evaluate PAD.[ In this study, we evaluated PAD in patients with APE and assess its correlation with right ventricular function by retrospective ECG-gated CTPA.

Materials and methods

Subjects

This study was approved by the hospital ethics committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University (IRB2020103), which waived the requirement for written informed consent because of the retrospective nature of the study. All accessed patient data were de-identified. The study group consisted of patients with suspected APE who underwent retrospective ECG-gated CTPA on 640 slice-volume CT in our institution from May 2016 to May 2019, and all the patients had signed informed consent forms for the examination. Participants were excluded if there was: previous history of serious heart disease, such as valvular disease, cardiomyopathy, congenital heart disease, etc.; previous history of pulmonary hypertension; CTPA showed right ventricular wall hypertrophy; or inadequate CTPA images. Of all the patients that received CTPA at our institution during the study period, 163 subjects were identified that received retrospective ECG-gated CTPA. After excluding valvular disease (15 cases), cardiomyopathy (3 cases), congenital heart disease (10 cases), previous history of pulmonary hypertension (24 cases), right ventricular wall hypertrophy (11 cases), and inadequate CTPA images (4 cases), a total of 96 subjects were identified. The APE diagnostic criteria were CTPA showed low-density filling defects, stenosis, or occlusion of pulmonary arteries on more than 2 consecutive slices. There were 33 subjects who met the diagnostic criteria for APE, and 63 subjects without APE. All APE patients were divided into 2 groups according to APE severity: severe PE (SPE) and non-severe PE (NSPE). Patients in the SPE group had at least one of the following clinical manifestations: systolic blood pressure (SBP) <90 mm Hg, >15 minutes; tachycardia >100 beats per minute (bpm), or bradycardia <40 bpm, an SBP drop by >40 mm Hg; partial pressure of oxygen <60 mm Hg; or respiratory rate >25 breaths/minutes.[ The control group were selected from the remaining 63 subjects who had no embolisms to approximately match the age, sex distribution and body mass index (BMI) of the APE patients group.

Scanning protocol

CT scanning was performed using a 640 slice-volume CT (Aquilion ONE, Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The tube current was determined with the automatic exposure control (SUREExposure3D, Toshiba Medical Systems). Tube voltage was manually set by the operator with the default of 100 kVp, and adjusted to 120 kVp when the automatic tube current selected the maximum. Retrospective ECG-gated scanning low-dose mode, heart rate ≤65 bpm: full-dose exposure at 70% to 80% phase (half-dose exposure for other phases); heart rate >65 bpm, full-dose exposure at 30% to 80% phase (half-dose exposure for other phases). Slice thickness: 1 mm, interval: 1 mm. Adaptive iterative dose reduction: AIDR3D, FC43. The volume of isotonic contrast medium was adapted to the patient's body weight (1.1 ml/kg) (iodixanol, 320 mgI/ml; Yangtze River Pharmaceutical Group, Taizhou, China) at a rate of 4 ml/second, followed by 30 ml of 0.9% saline solution injected at the same flow rate as the contrast material. With a dual-shot injector (OptiVantageDH, Mallinckrodt, Staines-upon-Thames, UK), the contrast material and saline solution were injected through a 18-gauge intravenous injection catheter inserted into the antecubital vein.

Reconstruction and measurements

CT image post-processing

Retrospective reconstruction was completed in the 5% to 95% phases at 10% intervals. The 10 sets of images were sent to an image post-processing workstation (Vitrea, Version 6.7.2). To ensure study objectivity, the data were measured by 2 physicians with extensive experience who were skilled in using the software and had no knowledge of patient information, and the mean values were calculated.

PAD evaluation

On the first set of reconstructed images, a cross-section of the main pulmonary artery was identified midway between the origin and its furcation, and it was adjusted to be perpendicular to the long axis in both the axial and coronal planes (Fig. 1). The measurements were repeated on the other 9 image sets. The maximum cross-sectional area (Ss) and minimum cross-sectional area (Sd) of the pulmonary artery were recorded.
Figure 1

Measurement of cross-sectional area of pulmonary artery. (A) The coronal plane of reconstruction used for cross-sectional area measurement was adjusted to be perpendicular to the pulmonary artery on both (B) sagittal and (C) axial views. The manual measurement of pulmonary artery in (D) systole and (E) diastole.

Measurement of cross-sectional area of pulmonary artery. (A) The coronal plane of reconstruction used for cross-sectional area measurement was adjusted to be perpendicular to the pulmonary artery on both (B) sagittal and (C) axial views. The manual measurement of pulmonary artery in (D) systole and (E) diastole. In this study, artery distensibility (AD) was chosen to evaluate pulmonary artery elastic properties (i.e., pulmonary artery distensibility [PAD]), which was reported by previous publications:[ PAD = ([Ss–Sd]/Sd)/(SBP–DBP) Ss and Sd were defined as maximum luminal area and minimum luminal area, respectively. SBP: systolic blood pressure. DBP: diastolic blood pressure.

Right ventricular function evaluation

The raw data were transferred to the cardiac function analysis software on the post-processing workstation of Vitrea FX for cardiac function evaluation. Right ventricular end-diastolic volume (RVEDV), right ventricular end-systolic volume (RVESV), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), and left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) were automatically calculated by the computer. RVEDV/LVEDV and RVESV/LVESV ratios were calculated separately.

Statistical analysis

Data analysis was performed with SPSS 17.0 statistical software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL), with P < .05 indicating significant differences. First, normality was assessed with Shapiro–Wilk testing, and homogeneity of variance was determined by Levene tests. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare measurements among groups (Welch test used for variance nonhomogeneity), and Least Significant Difference (homogeneity of variance) or Games–Howell (variance nonhomogeneity) tests were carried out for comparisons between groups. χ2 tests were used to compare categorical data. The correlations between RVDSV, RVESV, RVEDV/LVEDV, RVESV/LVESV, and PAD were analyzed by Pearson correlation analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the accuracy of each parameter to assess APE severity and to determine the best critical point and the sensitivity and specificity.

Results

General clinical information of patients

There were 33 subjects (16 males, 17 females) in the APE group with an age range of 47 to 83 years (mean 65.2 ± 8.7). The mean body mass index (BMI) of these patients was 23.5 ± 3.2 kg/m2. This group was further divided into NSPE (17 cases) and SPE (16 cases). The control group included 30 subjects (14 males, 16 females) with an age range of 42 to 73 years (mean 62.0 ± 7.3). The mean BMI of the control group was 23.2 ± 2.9 kg/m2. There were no significant differences in age, gender composition, or BMI among the 3 groups. Their basic demographic characteristics were shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Comparison of basic data among the three groups.

GroupControlNSPESPEF/χ2P
Sex (female/n)16/309/178/160.049.976
Age62.0 ± 7.363.1 ± 9.167.5 ± 7.92.547.087
BMI23.2 ± 2.922.7 ± 2.524.4 ± 3.11.418.250
Smoking status
Ever-smoker129102.244.326
Never-smoker1886
Hypertension9440.297.935
Diabetes mellitus2210.703.843
Comparison of basic data among the three groups.

Comparison of PAD among the 3 groups

The PAD of the control, NSPE, and SPE groups were (7.877 ± 2.637) × 10−3 mm/Hg, (6.050 ± 2.011) × 10−3 mm/Hg, and (4.321 ± 1.717) × 10−3 mm/Hg, respectively (Table 2). There were significant differences among the 3 groups (P < .01).
Table 2

Comparison of PAD among the three groups.

GroupControlNSPESPEFP
PAD7.877 ± 2.6376.050 ± 2.0114.321 ± 1.71713.161.000
Comparison of PAD among the three groups.

Comparison of right ventricular function among the 3 groups

The overall differences of RVEDV, RVESV, RVEDV/LVEDV, RVESV/LVESV between the 3 groups were statistically significant (P < .05, Table 3).
Table 3

Comparison of right ventricular function among the three groups.

GroupControlNSPESPEFP
RVEDV134.8 ± 34.75138.9 ± 29.37194.9 ± 80.204.002.029
RVESV65.80 ± 20.3280.88 ± 38.50111.2 ± 51.496.248.006
RVEDV/LVEDV1.119 ± 0.5411.147 ± 0.2281.749 ± 0.6507.118.004
RVESV/LVESV1.417 ± 0.3831.473 ± 0.4092.421 ± 1.2894.523.020
Comparison of right ventricular function among the three groups. Pairwise comparison showed significant differences in RVEDV between the control and SPE groups (P = .027) and the SPE and NSPE groups (P = .042). There was a significant difference in RVESV between the control and SPE groups (P = .009). There were significant differences in RVEDV/LVEDV between the control and SPE group (P = .004) and the SPE and NSPE groups (P = .007), and for RVESV/LVESV between the control and SPE groups (P = .020) and the NSPE and SPE groups (P = .030).

Correlation between PAD and right ventricular function

There was a weak negative correlation between PAD and right ventricular function parameters (r = −0.281–−0.392, Table 4).
Table 4

Correlations between PAD and right ventricular function.

R (PAD)P
RVEDV−0.325.009
RVESV−0.392.001
RVEDV/LVEDV−0.319.011
RVESV/LVESV−0.281.025
Correlations between PAD and right ventricular function. Three decimal five. ROC curve analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of PAD and functional parameters The areas under ROC curve of PAD, RVEDV, RVEDV/LVEDV, RVESV/LVESV were all >0.7 (Table 5). The area under the ROC curve of PAD was 0.743, the critical value of differentiation was 4.200, and the sensitivity and specificity were 62.5% and 94.1%, respectively (Fig. 2).
Table 5

ROC curve analysis of right ventricular function parameters and PAD.

ParametersPAUCCritical valueSensitivity (%)Specificity (%)
PAD.0170.7434.20062.594.1
RVEDV.0140.750156.075.076.5
RVESV.0690.68693.0062.576.5
RVEDV/LVEDV.0050.7871.26875.082.4
RVESV/LVESV.0340.7171.90356.388.2
Figure 2

ROC curve of right ventricular function parameters and PAD.

ROC curve analysis of right ventricular function parameters and PAD. ROC curve of right ventricular function parameters and PAD.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to apply PAD obtained by retrospective ECG-gated CTPA to evaluate APE severity and right ventricular function. There are 2 main findings. First, retrospective ECG-gated CTPA could reflect the characteristics of PAD and right ventricular function in APE patients while accurately diagnosing APE. Second, PAD was related to APE severity and right ventricular function, which helped identify high-risk patients. As APE severity increased, PAD was reduced. There was a slight-to-moderate negative correlation between PAD and right ventricular function parameters in subjects with APE. APE is one of the leading causes of death in subjects with cardiovascular disease and is commonly encountered in clinical practice. The mortality rate of diagnosed and treated APE ranges from 3% to 8%, but increases to ∼30% for untreated APE.[ The recommended treatment and prognosis vary widely according to APE severity,[ so timely risk stratification is essential to optimize patient management.[ Rapid integration of historical information and physical findings with readily available laboratory data and various imaging examinations including echocardiography and CTPA are necessary for this process. Studies have shown that ECG-gated CTPA can provide a definitive diagnosis of APE and also reflect cardiac function information such as ejection fraction, RV/LV ratio, wall motion abnormality, and atrial thrombosis.[ This method is therefore helpful for risk stratification in APE patients, including emergency patients as is fast and non-invasive. Our study revealed significant differences in right ventricular function parameters among the 3 groups. The only significant difference in RVESV was between the control and SPE groups. There were significant differences in RVEDV/LVEDV and RVESV/LVESV between the control and SPE groups and NSPE and SPE groups. As APE severity increased, so did the ratios of RVEDV/LVEDV and RVESV/LVESV, which is consistent with previous reports.[ APE leads to hemodynamic abnormality, presenting as sudden pulmonary hypertension. This event increases the RV after load, which manifests as RV dilation and interventricular septal bulging. The sudden drop of RV cardiac output leads to decreased LV filling. Therefore, the RVEDV/LVED and RVESV/LVESV increase significantly.[ The ratio parameters eliminated the effects of individual differences and basic cardiac function, which could more objectively reflect right ventricular function impairment. The areas under the ROC curve for the accuracy of RVEDV/LVEDV and RVESV/LVESV in the diagnosis of severe APE were all >0.7, which was helpful to identify severe APE and guide further treatment. Pulmonary artery elasticity can reflect the degree of pulmonary hypertension and is a powerful predictor of death in patients with pulmonary hypertension.[ Direct PAD evaluation is only possible with invasive right heart catheterization, which is the current gold standard. Frequent follow-up, screening tests or treatment responses are needed clinically, so an alternative non-invasive method is desirable.[ CTPA is now widely used in clinical practice. Many studies have demonstrated that this rapid, accurate, and non-invasive method can acquire embolism information for APE and also provide functional RV information. Previous reports confirmed that retrospective ECG-gated CPTA could be used to evaluate PAD.[ Therefore, this study adopted retrospective ECG-gated CTPA performed with 640 slice-Volume CT to evaluate APE severity and right ventricular function. PAD values were significantly different among the 3 groups and decreased with greater APE severity. Previous reports described reduced PAD in patients with pulmonary hypertension compared to normal subjects; it was sensitive to early increased vascular resistance in pulmonary hypertension and was a predictor of adverse outcome.[ The present study found that the pulmonary artery expanded and was difficult to dilate when the pulmonary circulation resistance increased after APE, so PAD decreased. The area under the ROC curve of PAD in the diagnosis of SPE was 0.743 with sensitivity and specificity of 62.5% and 94.1%, respectively, which was helpful for risk stratification. We also found a weak negative correlation between PAD and right ventricular function parameters in APE patients. As PAD decreased, and right ventricular function parameters increased accordingly, indicating that PAD could indirectly reflect impaired right ventricular function in patients with APE. This study has several limitations. First, the sample size was small, and we did not perform invasive right heart catheterization to evaluate pulmonary artery pressure. Secondly, this study involved exclusively oriental/Chinese subjects and would limit its utility, particularly in terms of generalizing this study to other ethnicities. Thirdly, the method only reflected the elastic characteristics of a certain segment of pulmonary artery, not the entire artery, but the results were quite obvious and reasonable in terms of severity correlation. Furthermore, the patients with heart disease/valvular diseases, existing pulmonary hypertension (in whom the PA is already dilated), and those with right ventricular hypertrophy were also excluded. In the future, a larger population including various pathological states will be assessed to achieve a better understanding of vascular pathophysiology in APE patients. In conclusion, this study established the feasibility of risk stratification using PAD non-invasively measured with retrospective ECG-gated CTPA. The decrease in PAD with increasing APE severity and the significant negative correlation relationship between PAD and right ventricular function should be taken into account in clinical trials and treatments for APE. The ability of retrospective ECG-gated CTPA to acquire both structural and functional information in APE patients enhances the clinical application of this approach.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Fei Yang. Data curation: Yujiao Zhang. Formal analysis: Xiaolong Zhu. Funding acquisition: Dawei Wang. Project administration: Shujun Cui. Software: Shanglin Dong. Supervision: Zhenming Zhang. Writing – original draft: Dawei Wang. Writing – review & editing: Fei Yang.
  24 in total

1.  Management of massive and submassive pulmonary embolism, iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis, and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Michael R Jaff; M Sean McMurtry; Stephen L Archer; Mary Cushman; Neil Goldenberg; Samuel Z Goldhaber; J Stephen Jenkins; Jeffrey A Kline; Andrew D Michaels; Patricia Thistlethwaite; Suresh Vedantham; R James White; Brenda K Zierler
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Prediction of adverse clinical outcome in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: evaluation of high-sensitivity troponin I and quantitative CT parameters.

Authors:  Paul Apfaltrer; Thomas Walter; Joachim Gruettner; Frank Weilbacher; Mathias Meyer; Thomas Henzler; Michael Neumaier; Stefan O Schoenberg; Christian Fink
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  Axial and reformatted four-chamber right ventricle-to-left ventricle diameter ratios on pulmonary CT angiography as predictors of death after acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Michael T Lu; Shadpour Demehri; Tianxi Cai; Layla Parast; Andetta R Hunsaker; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Frank J Rybicki
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Short-term mortality in acute pulmonary embolism: clot burden and signs of right heart dysfunction at CT pulmonary angiography.

Authors:  Alessandro Furlan; Ayaz Aghayev; Chung-Chou H Chang; Amol Patil; Kyung Nyeo Jeon; Bumwoo Park; David T Fetzer; Melissa Saul; Mark S Roberts; Kyongtae T Bae
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Endovascular Management of Massive and Submassive Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Current Trends in Risk Stratification and Catheter-Directed Therapies.

Authors:  Ethan C Kosova; Kush R Desai; Daniel R Schimmel
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  CT pulmonary angiography findings that predict 30-day mortality in patients with acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Andreas Gunter Bach; Baasai Nansalmaa; Johanna Kranz; Bettina-Maria Taute; Andreas Wienke; Dominik Schramm; Alexey Surov
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  Noninvasively assessed pulmonary artery stiffness predicts mortality in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Authors:  C Tji-Joong Gan; Jan-Willem Lankhaar; Nico Westerhof; J Tim Marcus; Annemarie Becker; Jos W R Twisk; Anco Boonstra; Pieter E Postmus; Anton Vonk-Noordegraaf
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Main pulmonary arterial distensibility: different presentation between chronic pulmonary hypertension and acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Den-Ko Wu; Shih-Hung Hsiao; Shih-Kai Lin; Chiu-Yen Lee; Shu-Hsin Yang; Shu-Mei Chang; Kuan-Rau Chiou
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.993

9.  Analysis of elasticity characteristics of ascending aorta, descending aorta and pulmonary artery using 640 slice-volume CT.

Authors:  Fei Yang; Dawei Wang; Huaijun Liu; Xiaolong Zhu; Dianjun Zou; Xiaocan Wang; Zhenshun Hu; Mengmeng Ji; Shujun Cui; Yue Xiang Zhu; Jing Wen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Pulmonary artery relative area change detects mild elevations in pulmonary vascular resistance and predicts adverse outcome in pulmonary hypertension.

Authors:  Andrew J Swift; Smitha Rajaram; Robin Condliffe; Dave Capener; Judith Hurdman; Charlie Elliot; David G Kiely; Jim M Wild
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 6.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.