OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to retrospectively compare right ventricular-to-left ventricular (RV/LV) diameter ratios measured on the standard axial view versus the reformatted four-chamber view as predictors of mortality after acute pulmonary embolism (PE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six hundred seventy-four consecutive patients (mean age, 58 years; 372 women) with a diagnosis of acute PE on pulmonary CT angiography were considered. The axial and reformatted four-chamber RV/LV diameter ratios were compared as predictors of 30-day all-cause and PE-related mortality. RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients (14%) died within 30 days; 39 deaths were PE related. There was no significant difference in the univariate hazard ratios (HRs) of axial and four-chamber RV/LV diameter ratios greater than 0.9 for both all-cause (HR, 2.13 [95% CI, 1.29-3.51] vs HR, 1.95 [95% CI, 1.22-3.14]; p = 0.74) and PE-related (HR, 19.6 [95% CI, 2.70-143] vs HR, 21.8 [95% CI, 2.99-158]; p = 1.0) mortality. Axial and four-chamber multivariate HRs accounting for potential confounders such as age and cancer were also similar for all-cause (HR, 1.79 [95% CI, 1.07-2.99] vs HR, 1.54 [95% CI, 0.95-2.49]; p = 0.62) and PE-related (HR, 16.3 [95% CI, 2.22-119] vs HR, 17.7 [95% CI, 2.43-130]; p = 1.0) mortality. There was no significant difference in sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, or positive predictive value. Axial and four-chamber measurements were well correlated (correlation coefficient, 0.857), and there was no significant difference in overall accuracy for predicting all-cause (area under the curve [AUC], 0.582 vs 0.577; p = 0.72) and PE-related (AUC, 0.743 vs 0.744; p = 1.0) mortality. CONCLUSION: The axial RV/LV diameter ratio is no less accurate than the reformatted four-chamber RV/LV diameter ratio for predicting 30-day mortality after PE.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to retrospectively compare right ventricular-to-left ventricular (RV/LV) diameter ratios measured on the standard axial view versus the reformatted four-chamber view as predictors of mortality after acute pulmonary embolism (PE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six hundred seventy-four consecutive patients (mean age, 58 years; 372 women) with a diagnosis of acute PE on pulmonary CT angiography were considered. The axial and reformatted four-chamber RV/LV diameter ratios were compared as predictors of 30-day all-cause and PE-related mortality. RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients (14%) died within 30 days; 39 deaths were PE related. There was no significant difference in the univariate hazard ratios (HRs) of axial and four-chamber RV/LV diameter ratios greater than 0.9 for both all-cause (HR, 2.13 [95% CI, 1.29-3.51] vs HR, 1.95 [95% CI, 1.22-3.14]; p = 0.74) and PE-related (HR, 19.6 [95% CI, 2.70-143] vs HR, 21.8 [95% CI, 2.99-158]; p = 1.0) mortality. Axial and four-chamber multivariate HRs accounting for potential confounders such as age and cancer were also similar for all-cause (HR, 1.79 [95% CI, 1.07-2.99] vs HR, 1.54 [95% CI, 0.95-2.49]; p = 0.62) and PE-related (HR, 16.3 [95% CI, 2.22-119] vs HR, 17.7 [95% CI, 2.43-130]; p = 1.0) mortality. There was no significant difference in sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, or positive predictive value. Axial and four-chamber measurements were well correlated (correlation coefficient, 0.857), and there was no significant difference in overall accuracy for predicting all-cause (area under the curve [AUC], 0.582 vs 0.577; p = 0.72) and PE-related (AUC, 0.743 vs 0.744; p = 1.0) mortality. CONCLUSION: The axial RV/LV diameter ratio is no less accurate than the reformatted four-chamber RV/LV diameter ratio for predicting 30-day mortality after PE.
Authors: Thomas Lehnert; Anna Wrzesniak; Dominik Bernhardt; Hanns Ackermann; J Matthias Kerl; Fernando Vega-Higuera; Thomas J Vogl; Ralf W Bauer Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2012-08-14 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Mi-Jeong Kim; Hae Ok Jung; Jung Im Jung; Ki Joon Kim; Doo Soo Jeon; Ho-Joong Youn Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2014-04-29 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Sheng Yu; Kanako K Kumamaru; Elizabeth George; Ruth M Dunne; Arash Bedayat; Matey Neykov; Andetta R Hunsaker; Karin E Dill; Tianxi Cai; Frank J Rybicki Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2014-08-10 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Abhishek Chaturvedi; Joel P Thompson; Katherine Kaproth-Joslin; Susan K Hobbs; Karl Q Schwarz; Vijay K Krishnamoorthy; Apeksha Chaturvedi; Timothy Baran Journal: Emerg Radiol Date: 2017-03-29
Authors: Jasleen Minhas; Pietro Nardelli; Syed Moin Hassan; Nadine Al-Naamani; Eileen Harder; Samuel Ash; Gonzalo Vegas Sánchez-Ferrero; Stefanie Mason; Andetta R Hunsaker; Gregory Piazza; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Aaron B Waxman; Steven M Kawut; Raúl San José Estépar; George R Washko; Farbod N Rahaghi Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2021-09-21 Impact factor: 8.589
Authors: Kanako K Kumamaru; Elizabeth George; Ayaz Aghayev; Sachin S Saboo; Ashish Khandelwal; Sara Rodríguez-López; Tianrun Cai; Daniel Jiménez-Carretero; Raúl San José Estépar; Maria J Ledesma-Carbayo; Germán González; Frank J Rybicki Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2016 May-Jun Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Kanako K Kumamaru; Elizabeth George; Nina Ghosh; Carlos Gonzalez Quesada; Nicole Wake; Marie Gerhard-Herman; Frank J Rybicki Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-04-13 Impact factor: 2.357